Preview

Should The Government Monitoring The Internet?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Government Monitoring The Internet?
"The founding fathers never planned for the internet. They didn_Ñét plan for a lot of things, in fact, including issues due to technology, social justice, or economic trouble that weren_Ñét even in existence during their time. Because of this, they created the Constitution and Bill of Rights to be relatively broad, intending that it would encompass the framework for the future. Little did they know how the scope of this broadness would shape America_Ñés future. The extent to which the government should interact in the lives of the American people is one of the most highly debated topics of both past and present politics. And, as the role of technology in the 21st century becomes more and more prevalent, this specific idea becomes increasingly …show more content…
It is reasonable for the federal government to have flags for certain keywords that people might look up. Searches such as _ÑÉhow to build a homemade bomb_Ñé or _ÑÉeasiest ways to kidnap somebody_Ñé could justifiably act as triggers for the safety of communities. However, a person cannot be incriminated or jailed solely on the basis of their searches, for due to the first amendment we have the right as Americans to say and type whatever we desire. The duty of the government therefore is to monitor the web before and after a crime takes place. For example, if a person has multiple searches all relating to terrorism, and these searches contain triggering words, it is prudent to have the county police investigate the suspicious activity a little more or to have an officer show up at the house; these actions are justified in the fourth amendment due to the right _ÑÒagainst unreasonable searches and seizures_Ñ_ but upon probable cause_Ñù. When it pertains to monitoring internet content, the probable cause leading to further investigation or searches would be a series of flagged internet search …show more content…
While in a way the freedom of searching whatever is desired is being given up, this is no different than other small freedoms that Americans trade in everyday without thinking about. When boarding an airplane, people walk through metal detectors without question because it gives them the security of knowing the flight will be safe, and that safety is worth giving up the freedom of being able to bring whatever you desire on an airplane. When in a public space, security cameras are accepted, even encouraged, by most people because it provides a safety factor even though this too involves giving up a small freedom. In this way, having the federal government monitor red-flags of internet searches for the good of public safety, and then having authorities follow through on suspicious activity, is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Technology has also further developed the safety and security of our world. In an article about digital government President Barack Obama said,“I want us to ask ourselves every day, how are we using technology to make a real difference in people’s lives”. The article explains how new technologies are providing the government with important information such as natural disasters, security concerns, and any information they need in a millisecond because of the high-speed networks of technology in the world. The government is using technology to better connect and provide different services to the American people. The government is dedicated to keeping each individual person, and the nations private information safe, and secure. Technology is “enriching” our lives through so many ways we could not live without it.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People charged with violations of the Patriot Act that involve internet users have had their Fourth Amendment rights violated by secret searches which is the government’s ability to search private property without notice to the owner and by trap and trace searches which collects addressing information about the origin and destination of communications not just the content. By the government using the secret searches they are able to find information that is not always available on the internet or outside of your computer or your home.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patriot Act Case Study

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Obviously searching through internet and phone records is a great tool to aid them in tracking terrorists, while seizing bank accounts holts funding for their activities. I suspect…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in the beginning stages of the War on Terrorism, President Bush enacted the Patriot Act. This allowed the government to spy on citizens, monitoring their activities in order to discern whether or not someone is a terrorist. It brought about changes in law enforcement that allowed agencies to search phones, financial records, etc.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2012). American government. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved January 3rd, 2013, from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUPOL201.12.1/sections/sec5.7.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NSA infiltrating the United States citizen's technology such as cell phones and computers is unjustified because there are no filters for the NSA or knowledge of their investigation taking place. For example "In his interview with RT, Binney emphasized that the FBI does not filter email messages but obtains and stores all of a person's e-mails, and when he or she becomes a target, their entire records are extracted and analyzed for the desired information" (NSA Whistleblower). Coming up with filtering processes would allow them to save time and filter out the non-terrorist threats. Many people make mistakes under pressure, knowing the National Security Agency is hunting you down is tons of pressure ask Osama bin…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ender's Game

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I mentioned before, government does have a small role in our personal lives in America, although some people might not realize it. After the tragedy of 9/11, the government stepped up efforts to prevent another terrorism attack on the U.S. Specifically, in The 9/11 Dilemma: Freedom vs. Security, it said “... Congress united to pass the Patriot Act, which expanded the government’s powers to conduct counterterrorism surveillance and investigations.” This gave the government the ability to do many new things, such as to monitor phone calls, conduct surveillance on anyone, and to go through household trash. In the second reference document I was given called Preserving Life and Liberty, it described more of the governments rights with the Patriot Act. It stated that the government could have access to library records, and could perform searches without first obtaining a warrant.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. A famous quote by none other than Benjamin Franklin, and although he did not live to see it, his words would be part of almost every argument considering internet surveillance. This ongoing debate is immense because many different people from all aspects of society use the internet, so everyone is affected by the outcome of the debate. There is no easy solution when it comes to the balance between security and freedom, but in the end the right thing to do is to allow people to not be monitored when surfing the internet as it is a violation of the constitution, very impractical, and morally wrong.…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, if a person gets on goggle and searches how to make a bomb, the government can react to that and see what they need a bomb for. Also, wiretapping monitors questionable people. Anybody that searches anything bad or that can harm someone else,, that person will be asked about whatever they searched. This will not affect your everyday life by any means. For example, if you search something that couldn’t harm someone elso you wouldn’t get a red…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by eavesdropping on…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government Surveillance

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Article IV of the Constitution of the United States, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. (Declaration 83)…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Technology Civil Rights

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The government wants to prevent terrorism but by collecting our data is violating our rights and not telling us the people. “The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has said that the bulk collection of phone records is illegal, saying it is “an unprecedented contraction of the privacy expectations of all Americans.” (Listenwise 2015) The government doesn’t care that its violating our rights because they are trying to catch terrorism by considering our data. If the government considers catching terrorist through looking in our data, why hasn’t there been any cases where they catch terrorist because of considering his data as in my opinion a terrorist up to no good in the united states would be using different phones to not get…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays