Preview

Should The United States Keep Nuclear Weapons In Turkey?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1514 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The United States Keep Nuclear Weapons In Turkey?
The United States should not keep their nuclear weapons in Turkey because nuclear weapons are harmful to the environment. A mass amount of research has been done, and scientists themselves have stated that nuclear weapons pose the single biggest threat to Earth’s environment. Nuclear weapons should be controlled because if a small-scale war were to arise, this small war would still devastate the world’s ecosystems and climate. The corruption that could occur due to a small-scale war can cause damage which would last more than a decade. In addition, by adding more nuclear weapons to arsenals, more soot is released into the air which is a mass of impure carbon particles which results from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons. This soot …show more content…
This type of nuclear conflict can be caused if the United States attack Turkey, which should not be something that the United States ends up doing. Some may say that the nuclear weapons that are located in Turkey today cannot be accessed by Turkey themselves, but that is not the case. The United States nuclear weapons that are kept in Turkey can be accessed because there is not much protection or safety that protects the nuclear arms. With the large number on nuclear weapons that are distributed around the world today, it is no surprise that there is enough nuclear material to create yet another 100,000 nuclear weapons. Although the United States is a rather large country, cities would still take damage. Also, countries that are densely packed would fare the most in the aftermath of a nuclear war, causing the world to slowly degrade. Even though specific geographic regions are targeted by nuclear weapons, the environment of the world is affected. One of those effects could be the rapid cooling of the …show more content…
This toxicity of nuclear weapons not only causes cancer, but a lot more health problems. The short term effects from radiation is nausea, vomiting, malnutrition, and fatal dehydration. The long term effects include thyroid cancer, lymphoma, and malformations of children. These effects can be deadly, further proving that nuclear weapons are a harm to the environment. Although nuclear weapons can affect the environment very negatively, it isn’t just the nuclear weapons that affect the environment. If there is a nuclear explosion, the capacity of the healthcare system which responds to this emergency is very important as well. As well as the healthcare system, a country or city must have enough money to help and lead them out of the aftermath of nuclear war. In the United States, “clean up” of this aftermath is projected to cost more than 300 billion through the year of 2070, making nuclear war a very costly activity. Not only are nuclear weapons costly money wise, they are costly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet, as years have gone since the US first developed a functioning nuclear weapon, the reasons for stockpiling nuclear warheads have begun to contain more of a domestic factor, and a normative factor to go with the clear initial security…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Last but not the least; nuclear power is hard to control when the accident happen. On the one hand, nuclear leakage, the highly radioactive material leaked. The radioactive material release to the air, soil and water, and attached to food. When people touch or eat these material, will have high rate get cancer. One the other hand, nuclear proliferation, radioactive dust will follow the wind to spread to the entire region. For…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madres de Plaza de Mayo is a social movement that emerged in Argentina military dictatorship between 1976 and 1983 also known as (La Guerra Sucia) Dirty War. Madres de Plaza de Mayo started in Buenos Aires when after their children were suddenly kidnapped by the government military who never admitted of this crime. Madres de Plaza Mayo is an example of new movement formed mostly by women, who struggle fight for human rights abuses. Majority of Las Madres were housewives that had to step into the public sphere in order to stop the kidnapping and demanded for their children to be returned to them. This was a great (impact to society) because a new way of social movement was emerging. Las Madres had to come out of their normal sphere, as housewives and mothers, into…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The incident on Three Mile Island had very insignificant effects on the workers and citizens near the power plant. There wasn’t enough radioactive material to cause harm. Nuclear weapons can cause massive health problems and ruin living conditions. There are three types of radiation: thermal, residual, and initial. Thermal radiation is caused by the impact of a nuclear bomb, burning the skin and eyes. The impact of thermal radiation also can cause massive fires around the area of impact. An article states,” A special feature of a nuclear explosion is the emission of nuclear radiation, which may be separated into initial radiation and residual radiation. Initial radiation, also known as prompt radiation, consists of gamma rays and neutrons produced within a minute of the detonation” (Britannica). These gamma rays are extremely deadly and dangerous. Contact with gamma rays can cause radiation sickness, as well as cancer. After the initial radiation, residual radiation takes over, the environment cant handle life and people get sick from the radiation. Extensive periods of radiation can cause deformities and it is extremely dangerous for pregnant…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein once said, “The explosive force of nuclear fission has changed everything except our modes of thinking and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe. We shall require an entirely new pattern of thinking if humankind is to survive” Albert Einstein, 1946. Nuclear weapons are arguably the most feared weapon ever created. They have the capability to end wars, nations, and even our planet if we are not careful. So, how serious is the threat of a terrorist cell acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it in an attack? Any statement containing the words ‘nuclear and weapon’ must almost always be considered serious but what is the likelihood of a successful nuclear terrorist attack occurring? The answer is anything but straight forward and many different avenues must be explored in order to better understand this current threat.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Richard Turco, an atmospheric scientist, claims that: “detonating between 50 and 100 [nuclear] bombs - just 0.03% of the world 's arsenal - would throw enough soot into the atmosphere to create climactic anomalies unprecedented in human history” (Jhan. par. 3). At this moment it is believed that Pakistan and North Korea have close to 130 warheads of mass destruction under their possession. The detonation of their weapons alone would be enough, to make Mr. Turco’s discoveries a reality. Therefore disarming these two countries is definitely a priority, mostly because both governments are very unstable, and in the case of North Korea it is not a secret that they have attempted plans against the safety of the entire humanity with such arsenals, but even though the United Nations, and the IAEA are doing everything in their power to stop Pakistan and North Korea from manufacturing and initiating a nuclear war by condemning both countries to pay gigantic sanctions, both countries have continued to create such weapons.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Weapons Are Bad

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The instant a one megaton nuclear bomb is dropped everyone within a six mile radius of the drop site will be instantly vaporized. The people will literally not have known what hit them, because they will have vanished before the electrical signals from their sense organs can reach their brains. These are the people who are lucky, when it comes to a nuclear bombing. Those within a ten mile radius will have instantly become blind, and people even further away would become blind if they were looking in the same direction as the bomb. People thousands of miles away will die from gamma ray radiation, because the radiation will have destroyed their cellular structure, leading to painful bleeding from every orifice in their bodies (Hoffman). The use of nuclear weapons has been described by many as sheer madness, and something that if used is the equivalent of global suicide. The use of nuclear weapons violates international treaties, humanitarian laws, and is above all immoral. The only option to solve for this atrocity would be to ban all nuclear weapons now and forever.…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays