Similarities Between Correa And Petchesky

In Correa and Petchesky´s reproductive rights definition, this has its roots in the concepts of bodily integrity and sexual self-determination. According to them, for a women to achieve equal status with men, the must be respected as full moral agents, in other words women must determine the uses to which their bodies and minds are put through, whether that’s in respect to sexuality, reproduction or anything else. In the late 1970´s to early 1980´s women´s health movements emerged that aimed at achieving a women´s ability, as an individual and collectively, to decide their own sexual and reproductive lives, when healthy and in economic and social well-being.
With that said the concept of sexual and reproductive rights is enlarging to include social needs that lead to reproductive and sexual choice to most women around the world. With the possibility of women’s individual right to health, well-being, and self-controlled sexual lives” the necessary changes to eliminate poverty and empower women are built and dissolve the boundary between sexuality, human rights, and development, opening a wider view for both reproductive and sexual rights and rights in general.
The authors state four ethical principles that are grounds for these views on reproductive and sexual rights, these principles are bodily integrity, personhood, equality,
Therefore, it´s a social and an individual right since without it women can´t function as responsible community members. The bodily integrity principle claims that while reproductive and sexual rights are necessarily social, they are also unmistakably personal - they can´t be realized without attention to economic development, political empowerment, and cultural diversity, but their site is individual