Preview

Similarities Between Han And Roman Empires

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Han And Roman Empires
Roman and Han Empires
Nick Concutelli
There are many similarities and differences between the Roman and Han Empires. The similarities range from parts of the world they control to how they affected other parts of the world. The differences include who they had conflicts with, and how they settled them. But the main point to compare and contrast is the fall of the empires.
Firstly, one of the major similarities would be the way both empires fell. They were both very powerful and ruled large portions of the world. The main reason of their decline was their leaders being weak and not being able to support and lead them. Individuals who solely wanted power hurt both empires. They were both hurt by the frequent attacks from various tribes, and they were too spread out to regenerate what they had lost because they didn’t have as much control in some places as they did in others. You could say that the main reason of their downfall was their lack of leadership, and that lack of leadership is what still kills societies today.
…show more content…

Many Chinese communities were very self sufficient, and most trade was done between communities. In Rome the Roman’s economy dependent almost solely on trade, and as their trade routes were destroyed, pirates and bandits began stealing goods from the local merchants which created a decline in both trade and in profits. The decline in trade lessened the amount of taxes that were going back to the government. The Roman and Han Empires increased their taxes to fund their armies. Since rich landowners in both empires were not required to pay taxes, many of the poor went to these landlords for help and protection. In Rome, these taxes affected trade by making the tax on different goods go up, which caused

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences of the control and management of both regions may be attributed to the philosophical ideas and belief systems that existed at the time, influencing political structure in similar ways with only a few minor differences that set the two cultures apart.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. Germanic tribes attacked the Romans and the Huns attacked Han China. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires had problems with social in takes. The Han Dynasty had problems with taxations, peasants grew angry over the raise of taxes and revolved against china so they used the military to stop them but soon needed more soldiers so, the Han government forced many farmers and others to fight as well, generating a large group of angry citizens. The Romans struggled with religion more than taxes as Christianity spread through Rome officials…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collapse of Rome and Han

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many major similarities of the collapse are Rome and the Han empire such as they were both invaded by foreign enemies, the corruption of the governments, and the weak leaders. There are also many differences between the collapse of the Roman and Han empires such as, the Roman empire fell because of Germanic invasions, and the Civil Wars. The Han empire fell because, power was not held by the central government, and uprisings of desperate peasants.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fall of the Han dynasty and the fall of the Western Roman Empire do compare in some ways. For instance, they both faced internal oppositions. Notwithstanding, the Romans differentiate because they had been invaded unlike the fall of the Han. Furthermore, the empire of Western Roman did not dilapidate entirely likewise the Han. Both of them declined because of internal problems such as generals taking over when the empire was weak. The Romans had a time period from 235 to 284 C.E. where there were 26 recognized emperors that were in actuality merely generals claiming themselves as emperors. These generals held their domination briefly but lost it by their mutinous soldiers. Only one of them died of natural causes; the others died violently. Needless to say, that didn’t work out. In similarity, the Han dynasty generals effectively ruled the regions controlled by their armies. They allied with the affluent landowners of their regions and maintained rough order based on force of arms. This continued for a while but ended up eradicating the dynasty. To differ from each other, the Romans had external problems. Thus, Germanic peoples posed a serious threat to the Roman Empire. Alaric, the commander of Visigoths, had them storm and sack Rome. By that time Rome was in total pandemonium. Because of this, the Western Roman Empire fell to the ground. Nevertheless, unlike the Han, it did not collapse completely. The Han dynasty extirpated after the generals (who claimed themselves as emperors) lost control and the empire was divided into 3 large kingdoms. With the Romans, imperial authority persevered for other millennia in the eastern half, although, in the western, Roman authority gradually dissolved. Nomadic peoples built succors states in regions formerly subject to Rome. To conclude, The Western Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty differ and are similar in many ways, they are the same because they face internal oppositions and are different because Rome had been…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This provided the Han with tax revenue. Combine this with a wide variety of other revenue from tribute, silk, iron, salt, and wine and a powerful economy emerged, which led to a strong military. At the base of Han society was a free peasant class who owned and worked their own land. These peasants could be rewarded for their productivity.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason that that these empires fell was because the Roman Empire’s trade kept being disrupted by the barbarians as well as the Hans were being interrupted by the Xiongnu nomads. Also in Rome there was a decline in the interest of trade in younger citizens because their parents gave them whatever they needed so the younger citizens didn’t want to work for anything. There was also an inflation of prices on products in both of these empires and families couldn’t afford many things. If citizens couldn’t pay for the necessities then they went to black markets which cost the governments money. The most significant reason that these empires fell economically was the taxes. When the farmers with only a little bit of land they don’t really make any money off of it or pay taxes on it they sell it to a wealthy person who can but most large estate owners will bribe officials to avoid…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constantine I and Rome

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The differences between Classical Athens and Han China were major and distinctive. The background information, government, values of the individual, and art of each society show how differently each empire developed.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    han and roman empire

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    portion. The Roman Empire parallels the Han Dynasty in the internal pressures each empire has…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays