Obama gave a speech at the presidential convention in 2008, while in 2016, Trump gave a similar speech at the presidential election eight years after. After Trump gave her speech, the validity of her address seemed to correlate with that of Obama. The two addresses compare to each other based off of similar phrases that were observed in both. One statement, “You work hard for what you want in life,” was in both Obama and Trump’s speech. This event was televised to the citizens of the United States, where someone had the opportunity to point out the similarities between both incidents. This content also shows that the speechwriters who wrote Trump’s convention speech did not take the time to check and see if the material that was used had any relation to the statement of Obama. Based on ‘The New Yorker,’ the speechwriter included phrases in a draft before finalizing the final address. The problem would have been ethical if Trump’s speechwriter had involved the accreditation as to where they were mentioning the …show more content…
With plagiarism being a vital sign of journalism, it is important to make sure that when receiving information from someone else that they are cited properly and given the proper recognition. For example, with Trump’s speech, the people who wrote her statement did not take their time to make sure that what they were writing was authentic and original. The fairness knew what was done wrong and to giving credit where it was needed. Also, when it comes to misrepresenting information making sure that the facts are correct, which is extremely important because if someone is reading an article, he or she can believe that all the information is accurate. The code of ethics is vital for a journalist who is in the field so that they are reporting on the correct facts and providing the audience with what they need to know about current