Preview

Slp Format

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Slp Format
F O R M - 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (Order XVI Rule 4(1) (a) CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Under Article 136 of the Constitution of India) S.L.P. (Civil) No. .........................................................of......................... BETWEEN Position of parties In the Court/ Tribunal from whose order the Petition arises A) (Here insert the name/names of the petitioner (s) in this Court

Petitioner/ Respondent/ Appellant

Petitioner

B) C) AND D) (Here insert the name/names of respondent Petitioner/ Respondent/ Appellant Respondent

E) F)

........2/-

-2To Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and His Companion Judges of the Supreme Court of India. The Special Leave Petition of the Petitioner most respectfully showeth :1. The petitioner/petitioners above named respectfully submits this petition seeking special leave to appeal against the judgment/order of (Here specify the Court/Tribunal against whose order the leave to appeal is sought for together with number of the case, date of the order and the nature of the order such as allowing or dismissing the matter or granting or refusing the interim order etc.) 2. QUESTION OF LAW: The following questions of the law arises for consideration by this Hon'ble Court: (here set out the questions of law arising for consideration precisely) 3. DECLARATION IN TERMS OF RULE 4(2) The petitioner states that no other petition seeking leave to appeal has been filed by him against the impugned judgment and order. 4. DECLARATION IN TERMS OF RULE 6 The annexures produced alongwith the SLP are true copies of the pleadings/documents which formed part of the records of the case in the Court/Tribunal below against whose order the leave to appeal is sought for in this petition. 5. GROUNDS Leave to appeal is sought for on the following grounds. (Here specify the grounds precisely and clearly) 6. GROUNDS FOR INTERIM RELIEF: (here specify briefly the grounds on which interim relief is sought to)
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Ashok Raosaheb Bade Case Study
    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    How Did Ashok Raosaheb Bade Case Study

    It has come on the record that the deceased Ashok Raosaheb Bade died on 25/11/2009 due to electrical shock and at the time of the alleged incident he was 30 years old. However, there is nothing on the record to show that respondent no. 01 has employed the deceased Ashok as a labour. The petitioners failed to prove the master and servant relationship between the respondents and the deceased Ashok. So also the petition is barred by the law of limitation, as per the provisions of section 10 (2) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. In the above circumstances the petitioners are not entitled to claim compensation from the respondents, as prayed. In view of my above discussion, I answered issue no. 03 in the negative and in reply to issue no. 04, pass the following…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Air India Statutory Corporation. V. United Labour Union & Ors. (Sc 1997)
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Air India Statutory Corporation. V. United Labour Union & Ors. (Sc 1997)

    The appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dated April 28, 1992 made in Appeal No. 146 of 1990 and batch. The facts in appeal arising out of S.L.P. 7417/92, are sufficient to decide the questions of law that have arisen in these appeals. The appellant initially was a statutory authority under International Airport Authority of India Act. 1971 (for short, 'IAAI Act') and on its repeal by the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 was amalgamated with National Airport Authority (for short, the 'NAA') under single nomenclature, namely, IAAI. The IAAI is now reconstituted as a company under Companies Act, 1956.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shivjee Singh V Nagendra Tiwary & Ors Air 2010 Sc 2261
    • 3436 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Shivjee Singh V Nagendra Tiwary & Ors Air 2010 Sc 2261

    In this case, the complaint is sine qua non for taking cognizance by a Magistrate in a case exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions is the question which arises for consideration in this appeal filed against order dated 18.4.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1778 of 2007 whereby he remitted the case to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran with the direction to make further inquiry and pass appropriate order in the light of proviso to Section 202(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.).…

    • 3436 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Cases Crpc
    • 187441 Words
    • 750 Pages

    Cases Crpc

    1. These two appeals by special leave arise out of the same judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Hyderabad High Court dated the 15th April 1954 confirming those of the Sessions Judge of Nalgonda dated the 18th January 1954. In Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 1955 Rawalpenta Venkalu is the Appellant and in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 1955. Bodla Ram Narsiah is the Appellant.…

    • 187441 Words
    • 750 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Parrli Vaijnath Case Study
    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Parrli Vaijnath Case Study

    The petitioner in support of his contention examined himself as PW No. 01 (Exh.No. 11), Shri. Dhiraj Deoram Parmar as PW No. 02 (Exh.No. 12), Shri. Nandkishor Dayaram Parmar as PW No. 03 (Exh. No. 17) and closed his evidence vide evidence closing pursis (Exh.No.25). In addition to the above oral evidence, the petitioner has produced on record certain documents such as original marriage card, application for conciliation, office copy of notice, letter issued by Shri. Kutch Gurjar Kshatriya Samaj with Marathi translation, affidavit of the translator, resignation letter, copy of maintenance petition, withdrawal pursis, divorce deed…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Recent Law Laid Down by the Supreme Courts of Pakistan and India on Transparency in the Realm of Public Contracts
    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Recent Law Laid Down by the Supreme Courts of Pakistan and India on Transparency in the Realm of Public Contracts

    Civil Petition under Article 185(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 for Leave to Appeal against Judgment dated 26.06.2007 of the Honorable Balochistan High Court passed in Writ Petition No. 892 of 2006 vide which judgment the writ petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amnjyvber Jkfgvzjh Fhzv Whbkljzv Eh
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Amnjyvber Jkfgvzjh Fhzv Whbkljzv Eh

    Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1838 of 2013 Petitioner :- Ramratan Respondent :- Civil Judge, J.D. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Misra Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J. Heard Sri Abhishek Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice need not be issued to respondents, in view of the order being passed herein. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the Application Paper No.7-C filed in Suit No.952 of 2013 (Ramratan Vs. Gyanwati & others) by the petitioner is pending before Civil Judge (Jr. Division) Gorakhpur. A prayer has been made to issue a direction to the Respondent No.1 to decide the said application expeditiously. In so far as the relief claimed by the petitioner is concerned, no such order requires to be passed by this Court since there is no material available on record to indicate the pendency position of cases before the Respondent No.1 and as to how many older cases than of the petitioner, are pending before him. Therefore, this petition is finally disposed of by providing that the petitioner can file an expedite application before the Respondent No.1 for expeditious disposal of his application Paper No.7-C by giving reasons of urgency and in case such an expedite application is made the Respondent No.1 should apply his mind to the reasons set forth regarding urgency and pass orders thereupon forthwith. In case the Respondent No.1 accepts the grounds of urgency taken in the expedite application then he should ensure that any defendant who has put in appearance in the suit should be heard also on the application paper No.7-C. However, if the trial court is of the opinion that the unserved defendants are necessarily to be heard then in that event the application of the petitioner if any for service of notice in accordance with the procedure prescribed may be considered and disposed of forthwith. The petition is disposed of. No order is passed as to costs.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Law Final Draft
    • 10063 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Constitutional Law Final Draft

    The members are extremely thankful for guidance provided by Mr. Krishan Mahajan (Professor of Law, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab). We are grateful to him for giving us the opportunity to express our understanding on the topic: Supreme Court’s Approach In UOI V. H.S. Dhillon (1971 2 SCC 779). We also owe our honest appreciation to college staff at library and computer labs for co-operatively assisting in the process of researching the content and other clerical work.…

    • 10063 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    pinaki
    • 4557 Words
    • 19 Pages

    pinaki

    2. A-1, the first accused, along with A-2 and A-3, were charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304-B and 306 IPC. The Sessions Court convicted A-1 for the offence punishable under Section 498A IPC and sentenced him to suffer RI for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo further RI for six months. A-1 was also convicted for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo further RI for six months. A-2 and A-3, the mother of A-1 were, however, acquitted of the various offences alleged against them. The trial Court also acquitted A-1 of the offence charged against him under Section 304-B IPC. On appeal by A-1, the High Court though confirmed the conviction, modified the sentence under Section 498A IPC to two years' RI and a fine of Rs.2,500/- and in default to undergo further RI for six months, and for the offence under Section 306 IPC, the sentence was reduced to RI for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo RI for one year. It was ordered that the sentences would run concurrently. Aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court, this appeal has been preferred by A-1.…

    • 4557 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why detention of Subrata Roy is illegal per se
    • 2328 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why detention of Subrata Roy is illegal per se

    “We notice, on this day also, no proposal is forthcoming to honour the judgment of this Court….. In such circumstances, in exercise of the powers conferred under Articles 129 and 142 of the Constitution of India, we order detention of all the contemnors except the fourth respondent and send them to judicial custody at Delhi, till the next date of hearing….”…

    • 2328 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Res sub judice
    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Res sub judice

    Stay of suit: No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in India having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of India established or continued by the Central Government and having like jurisdiction, or before the Supreme Court.…

    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shamrao Case Study
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shamrao Case Study

    Respondent no. 01 resisted the petition by filing written say (Exh.No.10). He denied all adverse contentions. It is specifically denied that respondent no. 01 was working as his employee. In additional written say, it is pleaded that respondent no. 01 has given contract of digging well in his field to respondent no. 02 on 03/05/2011 for Rs.2,55,000/-. Respondent no. 02 has accepted Rs.2,55,000/- and agreed responsibility of the accident, if any, occured while digging the well. Respondent no. 02 employed deceased Shamrao and other employees as labour for digging the well. Hence, respondent no. 01 is not liable to pay compensation to the petitioners. There are relations between the deceased Shamrao and respondent no. 02 as servant and master. Hence, the petitioners have right to claim compensation from respondent no. 02. However, the petitioners have unnecessarily involved respondent no. 01 in the present matter. Due to which, respondent no. 01 is facing heart problems. He expanded Rs.3,00,000/- for treatment and spending his remaining life in a very critical condition. Ultimately, respondent no. 01 prayed to reject the petition with costs and compensatory costs of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indian Legal System
    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Indian Legal System

    Volume 36 Issue 2 Summer 2008 - Global Challenges & the Indian Legal System 3-2-2009 Article 8…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Public Interest Litigation
    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Public Interest Litigation

    The rule of locus standi have been relaxed and a person acting bonafide and having sufficient interest in the proceeding of Public Interest Litigation will alone have a locus standi and can approach the court to wipe out violation of fundamental rights and genuine infraction of statutory provisions, but not for personal gain or private profit or political motive or any oblique consideration (Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of W. B., (2004) 3 SCC 349)…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federal Government
    • 2202 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Federal Government

    References: Bakshi; P M (2010). Constitution Of India, 10/e. Universal Law Publishing Company Limited. pp. 48–. ISBN 978-81-7534-840-0. Retrieved 10 May 2012.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More