Preview

Smartphone Market Porter 5 Forces

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1055 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Smartphone Market Porter 5 Forces
In Smartphone Market, It’s Luxury or Rock Bottom
By CHRISTOPHER MIMS Feb. 1, 2015 8:53 p.m. ET (WSJ)
For Apple Inc. and Xiaomi, the Chinese smartphone maker often described as the “Apple of China,” it is the best of times. For most of the companies’ competitors, not so much.
In December, Xiaomi became the world’s most valuable tech startup, worth $46 billion. And last week’s blowout quarterly results for Apple were credited to just about everything—from consumers’ lust for big phones to Chief Executive Tim Cook ’s steady hand on the tiller—except for the most important factor of all. Apple and Xiaomi’s successes reflect the world’s growing income inequality.
Take a look at the chart accompanying this article. It shows the average selling price for smartphones from Apple, Xiaomi and all makers of Android-based phones. It succinctly captures a trend that has damaged the fortunes of just about every smartphone maker other than Apple, Xiaomi and a couple of other companies at the low end of the market: a hollowing out of demand for smartphones priced in the middle range.
The falling price of the average Android phone is driven by supply and demand, of course. As smartphone components become ever-cheaper, devices by Xiaomi, Coolpad Group , Vivo and countless no-name Chinese manufacturers whose wares are rebranded and sold throughout the developing world, keep driving down the price at which a smartphone is “good enough” for most users.

Xiaomi is masterful at this game, and its online-only sales and narrow range of products allow it to sell its phones at rock-bottom prices, says ABI Research analyst Nick Spencer. (Xiaomi also has curated a massive user community that serves as a powerful marketing engine.) This has forced competitors to react.
In the most recent quarter, profits of Samsung Electronics ’ mobile division plunged 62% from a year earlier, leading the South Korean company to declare that it would attempt to sell less-expensive phones, just like Xiaomi.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Profits from low-cost plans are barely keeping them afloat in an industry where evolving technology is vital for sustainability. Smart-phones continue to be the current and future cash crop of the cell phone industry. The best companies like AT&T, and Verizon offer reliable 4G network technologies, along with multimedia phones, that allow expeditious travel of data. Conversely, T-Mobile and Metro PCS are still operating on older network protocols and selling a lineup of smart-phones that are very lackluster when compared to the competitions iPhone, and Android.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supply is being affected by the cell phone carriers as well as factors of production. The contracts with the cell phone carriers influence how many phones to supply by each firm. Also, the price of producing the smart phones determines the price and amount of supply. As the demand and supply changes for smartphones, the equilibrium price is affected as well. Companies are not able to charge above the equilibrium price because they are at risk of losing consumers to the competitors. The smartphones that are in the market are very comparable and consumers do not always have brand loyalty. If they can get the same functions and abilities for less, they are likely to switch products. This has been seen a lot in the market between consumers switching between the Apple iphone and the Samsung…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edwards, J. (2015). The iPhone 6 Had Better Be Amazing And Cheap, Because Apple Is Losing The War To Android Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-v-android-market-share-2014-5#ixzz3YoonFpp6. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-v-android-market-share-2014-5…

    • 1823 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning, Apple took advantage of its product’s special features in the markets and set a pricing strategy as price skimming with two main purposes. Firstly, they want their product to be determined to have an outstanding position in their customers’ needs as well as being proved to be a breakthrough development among the markets. To illustrate further, an iPhone’s owner is considered to have high symbol status in the modern world; therefore, if the price of the product does not equally match the expected quality of it, the customer will not be satisfy with their attempt to buy the products. Another reason for Apple to rise up the iPhone’s price is that because they want to gain back the production and development costs for creating iPhones. On the other hand, this strategy does not allow the company to maintain that high price for a long time since they would possible face the fact of losing markets in the future.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    iphone vs android

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Affordability and durability are the two key factors when it comes to purchasing a smart phone. Apple and Google have gone head to head on competing for the best products. Most people assume that the expensive device has better durability and can be used longer. Price wise the Android phones ranges anywhere from one hundred to three hundred dollars. In contrast, the iPhone price range is between two hundred to six hundred dollars. Most Android users report that they have dropped their phone multiple times and have not had major damage to their phone. On the other hand, iPhone users state that the front screen display can be shattered easily because of the front screen glass like display, and replacing the screen can often cost more than the phone itself.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Raising smartphone estimates. We raise our global smartphone market forecast by 9%/15% to 688mn/885mn units (46%/29% growth) in 2012/2013, driven strength in both high end and low end segments. We believe the addressable market for smartphones is 2.35bn longer term, resulting in effective penetration of only 33% currently. With significant improvements in availability of lower end smartphones and LTE being an incremental driver, we expect effective smartphone penetration to rise to 100% and lead to smartphone volumes of 1.18bn units by 2015, 26% CAGR. On ASPs we believe the mix shift down market can be offset by Apple’s unprecedented ability to grow the high end, and hence see limited pressure near term. Credit Suisse smartphone vendor scorecard – Apple, Samsung, Nokia in the top three. We continue to rely on our proprietary smartphone vendor scorecard which is based on nine metrics (software, services, cloud, product, brand, distribution, compute convergence, IPR and chipset efficiency) which we believe drive success in smartphones. We conclude that secular share gainers will be Apple, Samsung and Huawei and see scope for Nokia’s share to recover. There are increasing signs of vulnerability for Motorola Mobility, HTC and Sony and a rapid decline for RIM. It is about more than just the phone now…think compute. Increasingly, we believe that success in smartphones will be impacted by success in…

    • 12756 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare and Contrast

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As of now the latest IPhone (Apple) and Android are the latest and most powerful Operating Systems on the market. These devices are used with most everybody’s lives, and honestly who can live without their cell phone or tablet. In a single day more than 10,000 new electronics are purchase worldwide. With IPhone and Android leading as the top 2 with their Apple and Samsung devices has went head to head in competing for the best product. Apple manages to keep their consumers coming back for more. With this Apple is the leader that manages to stay on top being the most purchased product in the U.S. Meanwhile Android is not too far in the dust. These two have both earned their respects of the world. So let’s look at some perks of the two devices.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mi Phone Market Strategy

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Low value of brand: Xiaomi is a new mobile phone corporation and has not impressed the public.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    company background

    • 2349 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Xiaomi’s phone has successfully conquered China and expanded into developing a wider range of consumer electronics. While commenters name Xiaomi as “The Apple of China”, Xiaomi prefers to be compared to Amazon instead.According to research firm Canalys, Xiaomi is currently the sixth-largest handset maker on earth and No. 3 in China, behind Samsung Electronics and Lenovo Group.…

    • 2349 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    founded by Lei Jun and several partners in 2010, and which has now grown to be the…

    • 6728 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xiaomi

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Competing only on price was not what XiaoMi has chosen as their core strategy. Surely, their phones and tablets are cheaper than Apple’s and Samsung’s but, by far, not the cheapest ones in the market. There are cheaper smartphones that flood China, however all of them have a major flow – poor quality. Essentially, those devices are reverse-engineered versions of Samsung models built from cheaper materials.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xiaomi 4p

    • 512 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * In 2011 the first millet mobile phone MI 1 release, sells nearly 1999 RMB. The latest MI phone MI 3 only 2999 RMB. For low-end Xiaomi’s mobile phone products, such as Hong MI and Hong MI note, only sells 799 RMB. Therefore, Xiaomi’s product is high quality mobile phone with lower price. Compare to others product in the industry, Xiaomi’s phone has its own price advantage for distribution to the UK. Use Vodafone Company as example.…

    • 512 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Answer For LG

    • 2749 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In table 7 & 8 (KPI tables), LG’s growth rate in 2010 fell sharply by 23.5% from a rise of 13% the previous year while Samsung’s growth increased by 11.24% and Sony’s profit also plunged by 7% in the same year. There was a paradigm shift in phone and tablet market from festures mobiles to top-end smart phones of which Samsung got a handle on earlier and raised its global smart phone market share from 3.2% in 2009 to 7.6% in 2010. By then Sony and LG drifted from paradigm trajectory such that their market shares were so insignificant to be grouped among other minor vendors.…

    • 2749 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Motovono

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The (2) Threat of Buyers seems moderate to high. The smartphone industry sells commodity products that are available through many different avenues (Amazon, EBay, mail order, Cell phone stores, BestBuy). Relatedly, there is a high treat of (3) Rivalry in this industry. With Apple and Samsung leading the way in smartphone sales, this is taking potential profit away from Lenovo. This can be correlated to threat of buyers since the buyers have the power in which…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This research report presents the 2013 review and early 2014 status of the Chinese smartphone industry. The report includes top 22 Chinese smartphone branded vendors' shipment volume in China, breakdowns of each vendor's shipment volume share by chipset maker, application processor model, ASP, panel size, and camera pixel. The report also examines major chipset makers' product mix for Chinese smartphones. The report finds that the Chinese smartphone industry's shipment volume reached around 422.2 million units in 2013, up 66.0% year on year, with a total number of 2,288 models launched over the year. The top six vendors—Samsung, Lenovo, Huawei, Coolpad, ZTE, Xiaomi— collectively took up over 50% of the total shipments. It is noted that smartphones equipped with a 4-to-5-inch panel and over 8M cameral pixels have become mainstream in China. Around 46% of the Chinese smartphones were sold at a mid-range price point (700 RMB to 2000 RMB, US$113 to US$322; US$1=6.2112 RMB) in 2013. While octa-core processor models took up less than 1% in terms of shipment volume in 2013, it is expected that the share will see significant growth in 2014 as major chipset makers have been promoting related solutions.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays