Answer: The most difficult to afford the costs and time commitment for upgrading their recordkeeping systems. In 2010, 80 percent of physicians and 90 percent of hospitals in the United States are still using paper medical records.
There are many other smaller obstacles that health care providers, health IT developers, and insurance companies need to overcome for electronic health records to catch on nationally, including patients privacy concerns, data quality issues, and resistance from health care workers.
Q. What is the business and social impact of not digitizing medical records (to individual physicians, hospitals, insurers, patients)?
Answer: In this case we can see that In 2009, the United States spent $2.5 trillion on health care, which was 17.6 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP). Approximately 12 percent of that figure was spent on administrative costs, most of which involve the upkeep of medical records. In manual record keeping system, USA are inflated by inefficiency, errors, and fraud. By using IT system they can save money on the other hand provide better service to the patient.
.If they use manual system in case of digital system government spend more money and they face different type of fraud and the service is not that much good which effect on business and social to everyone.
Q. What are the business and social benefits of digitizing medical recordkeeping?
Answer: The benefits of using digitizing medical recordkeeping –
Information technology presents an opportunity for health care providers to save money and provide better care.
An electronic medical record system contains all of a person’s vital medical data, including personal information, a full medical history, test results, diagnoses, treatments, prescription medications, and the effect of those treatments. So we can