During the classical era, Han China and Ancient Rome were the pioneers for the change and the plethora of improvements that took place in civilized societies. The Han Dynasty consisted of persistent regional riots and rebellions against harsh state demands, and Ancient Rome expanded through the Mediterranean and areas of Hellenistic civilization. Together, these two civilizations introduced many essential changes in human life and provided an arena for the spread of organized civilizations. Although both Han China and Ancient Rome acquired powerful religious systems, Ancient Rome’s social structure was far more structured than Han China’s in regards to treatment of women and social status.
Han China and Ancient Rome both demonstrated prosperous, influential religious systems that influenced other religious systems. In Han China, many followed Confucianism as a religion. Confucian teachings emphasized strong rulers and the consolidation of political power. Confucianism was not a religion, but a philosophy. It advocated rule by the highly educated, male elite, and it was primarily an ethical system. Respect for elders, art, music, and elegant calligraphy in the cultivation of scholar-bureaucrats were all important. Other Confucian teachings were Legalism, Daoism, and Buddhism. Confucianism has exerted a pervasive influence on other societies throughout Asia. Confucianism has affected and been incorporated in nearly every aspect of life. Education, government, behavior, and how the people should live their lives are all connected and Confucianism provided a code and a guide to have effective government and education, and lead a happy, successful life. China’s Confucian ideals, technological advancements, and prosperous agrarian state captivated major thinkers in Europe and the United States. The Roman Empire provided an arena for the spread of Christianity and the interaction of numerous diverse cultures. Christianity emerged during the first years of the Roman Empire under Augustus. Originally an offshoot of Judaism, early Christianity had little to do with Roman culture. In the centuries after Jesus' execution, many outside of Judaism converted to the new religion. Perhaps as many as 10 percent of the Roman population were Christian by the fourth century C.E. Christianity spread most rapidly among the poor and disadvantaged classes of the empire. Christianity also won converts from among those seeking a more emotionally satisfying form of religion. Roman stability and communications aided in the spread of the religion. The early political form of Christianity was drawn from the imperial constitution. In Christianity, bishops were governors of local communities and supervised activities from cities in which they resided. Bishops in the most powerful cities gained greater authority. The apostle Paul, who brought Christian beliefs to a wider public, was a critical figure in the dissemination of the new religion. Gradually Christian theologians began to define religious beliefs in terms of Greco-Roman philosophy. Christianity became the most creative intellectual area of later imperial culture. In this sense, Christianity was an important conservator of earlier intellectual traditions. Refusal of Christian communities to participate in state rituals caused some early emperors to persecute individuals and groups. Persecution was only episodic, and eventually the state was able to allot to the Church a legitimate, if subordinate, place in the world.
Women enjoyed more freedom and status in Han China than in Ancient Rome, which was a much more structured society for women. Because marriages were arranged with family alliances in Han China, young men had as little say in the choice of their spouses as women. Young brides usually could rely on their powerful relatives to ensure that they were well treated in the new home. Widowed women were permitted to remarry, and all women participated in family ceremonies. Women of upper class families were often tutored in writing, the arts, and music. Although political positions were reserved for men, women could sometimes exert powerful influence from behind the throne. In Ancient Rome, on the other hand, the Roman law stipulated that the husband is the judge of his wife. If she commits a fault, he punishes her; if she has drunk wine, he condemns her; if she has been guilty of adultery, he kills her. If divorced because of adultery, a Roman woman would lose one-third of her property and had to wear a special garment that set her apart like a prostitute. As wives and mothers, many aristocratic Roman women wielded political power, but only through their husbands. Inequality between men and women increased in the empire’s final stages. Roman family structure was very patriarchal. There was much less lenience in the class structure of Han China than Ancient Rome. In Ancient Rome, there was class conflict between the growing ranks of the poor and the Roman aristocracy. Some political leaders attempted to aggrandize their careers on the basis of this conflict. Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, two tribunes, attempted to introduce land reform and other social legislation in favor of the poor between 133 B.C.E. and 123 B.C.E. Both were killed by aristocratic mandate. After 107 B.C.E., the Roman consul Marius began to use paid volunteers to staff his armies in place of conscripted Roman citizens. The creation of a permanent military force dedicated to its commander threatened the position of the Senate. A second commander, Sulla, drove out Marius and his political allies. A succession of military commanders dominated Roman politics thereafter. A civil war between two of them, Pompey and Julius Caesar, brought the republic to an end. After Caesar took over the government in 49 B.C.E., he introduced various reforms. The result was to destroy the political monopoly of the Roman aristocracy. Traditionalist senators plotted against Caesar and had him assassinated in 44 B.C.E. Caesar's death precipitated a civil war from which Caesar's adopted son, Octavian, emerged the victor. While maintaining the external appearance of the republic, Octavian created an imperial state. For his success, he was granted the name Augustus. The Han class systems were much different. In Han China, rebellion was almost nonexistent. Ordinary farmers held varying amounts of land, and those who worked on the land of others as tenants or did landless labor were even more miserable. Many peasants joined secret societies with colorful names. Merchant classes became wealthier and more numerous, but they found it incredibly difficult to translate their profits into political power or social status. However, even when people were unhappy, they did not complain. Status was often unchangeable, so unlike Ancient Rome, people did not and could not revolt.
These great classical civilizations lend themselves to a variety of comparisons to other civilizations during the time. In particular, Confucianism of the Han Dynasty and Christianity of Ancient Roman have spread throughout the world. Because of the Roman Empire, Christianity has spread throughout Europe from Jerusalem to Mesopotamia. Today, it is most influential in North and South America and Europe. Because of the Han Dynasty, Confucianism and Confucian ideas have had an impact on Eastern Asia, especially Japan, Egypt, and Vietnam, and it has even influenced Taoism. Even though both Han China and Ancient Rome acquired incredible religious systems, Ancient Rome’s social structure was far more controlling than Han China’s in regards to treatment of women and social status.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In late B.C.E and early C.E many empires rose and thrived. While these empires all desired to conquer and become the strongest, they had other things in common. In Han China, a long lasting empire from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, the leadership was similar to the leadership of Imperial Rome, an empire from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires were lead by an emperor, who was the sole lawmaker for the empire, the over thrower of the previous leader and impact on many other aspects of the region. However, these two empires differed in their religious ways. In the Roman Empire, the government had a state sponsored religion and emperors participated in the organization of it. Contrary to Imperial Rome, Han China’s emperors were much less concerned with religion; instead they followed the Confucian ideology in their government. These two…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…
- 640 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Rome and Han China had both similar and different characteristics about their empires, while existing at the same time. While thousands of miles separated Rome and Han China, neither influenced the other. They both lasted approximately 400 years, with populations of about 50 million. The Roman Empire encompassed all the land that surrounded the Mediterranean Sea, as well as large portions of Continental Europe and the Middle East. The Han Empire however, stretched from the Pacific ocean to the oases of Central Asia.…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Rome’s political method is centered around polytheism. Han China’s political method is centered around Confucianism during the beginning of the dynasty, and then around Daoism after political changes were made. . Confucianism is defined as more of a philosophy than a religion. Confucius taught philosophical and ethical ideas, that shaped the traditional Chinese culture. Han China, after change in authority, transformed from Confucianism to Daoism. Imperial Rome was centered around polytheism, the worship of many Gods. It is very different than Daoism. Daoism is based upon philosophy and nature, but polytheism is based upon gods. Han China and Imperial Rome express different political methods of control through religion. Imperial Rome and Han China had different ways in which their leaders were chosen. In Han China, rule was gained through ancestors into a centralized bureaucratic authority. In Imperial Rome authority began through certain elements of democracy, not through ancestral…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
e west and the east, empires dominated the world from the 2nd century BC to the 2nd century AD. The main one in each area being the Roman Empire in the west, and the Chinese empire, or specifically the Han dynasty, in the east. While these two empires are thousands of miles apart and nearly one hundred years, there are many similarities between the two. The most significant difference between the two empires is the basis of government ideals.…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The massively extensive classical empires of Imperial Rome (31BCE-476CE) and Han China (206BCE-220CE) were extremely influential when it came to the world around them. In essence, the two empires were virtually the same in terms of political structure and military protocols, yet greatly different in the area of religious tolerance.…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Two of the greatest empires in all of history, the Ancient Roman and the Han China empires are similar in terms of both creating great inventions still used today; however, they are different in terms of how their militaries were organized and their religious beliefs.…
- 547 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays