Professional practice requires you to be clear about the ideas that are guiding you thinking and influencing your practice. In the light of the above statement my essay begins by illustrating the plight of disabled people, and the role of social services. What is also demonstrated is the legislation which developed as a result of the Seebohm Report. This is followed by signifying the value of assessment, and thus begins the starting point of my work with client X who had an inability to cope due to the admission of his mother to hospital. The significance of the NHS and Community Care Act 1990 s.47 and the FACS ‘Fair Access to Care Services’ are applied; this determines the eligibility of the client/s. The essay then goes on to discuss and evaluate personalisation and the theory attached to this and how I applied this to my practice in the work with client X and in what ways this benefited my practice. Lastly the essay addresses the issue of anti-discriminatory practice and concludes by showing how personalisation is a tool of empowerment for individuals who are part of adult services.
Prior to 1970, help for disabled people and their families were only available through the health service (medical social workers) or voluntary organisations. During the 1950’s a few local authorities set up professional social work services which were staffed mainly by medical social workers and in some cases occupational therapists. Previous to the Seebohm Report welfare departments also offered services to disabled people, but the majority
References: Audit Commission (1986). in Oliver, M. & Sapey, B. (2006). social work with disabled people.(3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Banks, S Beckett, C. and Maynard, A. (2008).Values & Ethics in Social Work: An Introduction. London: Sage Publications. Bradley J. M. & Cafferty, T.P. (2001). Attachment among older adults: Current issues and directions for future research: Attachment and Human Development, 3, 2, 200- 221. htpp:// www.tandfonline.com/loi/rahd20 [Accessed 20 May 2012]. Carr, S. (2010). Adult Services Report 20 Personalisation: a rough guide. (revised edition). SCIE.http://www.scie.org.uk/pub;lications/report[Accessed 13th May 2012]. Coulshed, V. & Orme, J. (2006). (4th ed.). social work practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Councils Intranet- no web address due to confidentialty Davies, M. (2008). The Blackwell Companion to Social Work (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Department of Health (2003c) Department of Health (2005b). Independence, Well Being and Choice. In Davies, M. (2008). The Blackwell Companion to Social Work (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Department of Health (2006a) Department of Health. (2007). Personalisation through Person-Centred Planning. http://www.familycarers.rg.uk/Libraries/Local. [Accessed 14th May2012]. Department of Health (2008b). Putting People First. In Gardner, A. (2011).Personalisation in Social Work: Exeter: Learning Matters. Fergurson, I. (2007) Increasing User Choice or Privatising Risk? The Antinomies of Personalisation: British journal of Social Work. 37, 387-403. http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org [Accessed May 13th 2012] Fielder, B Gardner, A. (2011).Personalisation in Social Work: Exeter: Learning Matters. Mandelstam, M. (2005).Community Care Practice and the Law. (3rd ed.). London: Jessica Kinsley. Oliver, M Prime Ministers Strategy Unit et al., (2005) in Davies, M. (2008). The Blackwell Companion to Social Work (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Shearer, A Skills for Care (2007) in Carr, S. (2010). Adult Services Report 20: Personalisation: a rough guide: (revised edition). [Accessed 13th May 2012]. Thompson, N. (2001). Anti-Discriminatory Practice. (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Disabled Persons Services, Consultation and Representation Act, 1986 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970