In Chapter 1, the author assesses the unique and eternal achievements of 5th century BCE Athenian culture. She introduces several basic dichotomies that define her understanding of the writers and events of the period in the later chapters.…
Dan starts to heal from his devastating injury caused by a motorcycle crash. Although, the doctor told Dan he wouldn’t be able to do gymnastics for another 6 months. After begging the gatekeeper to enter and compete he was finally able to try- out for the olympics. In order to prepare for the olympics, Socrates helps Dan train by setting up endurance courses and meditation techniques. Joy comes back and Dan feels more compassionate towards her than ever.…
This reading is so confusing, I read it three times and still have some confusion about the Socrates statements. Basically, it is a conversation or arguments between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is in the court because a man whose name is Meletus prosecuted him about corrupting the youth. Therefore, Euthyphro is in the court to prosecute his father for the murder of the servant. It is not proven that his father is killer but Euthyphro is trying to get justice on behalf of the servant. Euthyphro thinks that a person has to pay if he/she does something impiety. Euthyphro explains that piety is something the dear to god and impiety is the thing that you do and god does not like. Euthyphro is trying to explain Socrates that he has knowledge…
In the reading Euthyphro, it is an argument between Euthyphro (the priest) and Socrates (who is being indicted by another man). This reading is a dialogue between the two men arguing on the same topic, even though they each gave examples, they still can’t figure out the answer but going “around and around” with the original question. Since Euthyphro and Socrates gave a lot of examples during the argument, I was really confused when reading it. I couldn’t organize my thoughts on the reading. However with the example of Euthyphro persecuting his own father for “murdering” a drunk murder, I start to have an idea of what they are arguing about, in my opinion, it is a question with no right answer for. No matter which answer was given, the result…
In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro, a religious expert, who he runs into outside of a courthouse in Athens. Socrates was being indicted on the charges of corrupting the youth, and Euthyphro was prosecuting his own father for murder. Socrates was bewildered as to why Euthyphro would indict his own blood of a crime. In an attempt to explain to Socrates why it was the right thing to do, Euthyphro proclaims that he is acting piously by taking his father to court. Euthyphro adds that his relatives are mad at him because “it is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder. But their ideas of the divine attitude to piety and impiety are wrong” (4e). Because of this, Socrates enquires about what Euthyphro believes piety truly is, to which he provides his four definitions that Socrates ultimately disagrees with.…
Socrates and Euthyphro unexpectedly run into each other outside of the Athens courthouse. Euthyphro went to the courthouse to prosecute his father for killing one of his servants, who was a murderer. Socrates was summoned to court to be charged with disturbing the youth. After Euthyphro stated his business at the courthouse, Socrates assumes that he must be a religious expert if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a serious charge. Euthyphro then agrees with Socrates that he does indeed know all there is to know about what is holy. Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him what holiness is, in hope that it will help with his trial.…
This discussion wraps around the reason Socrates is on trial and his standing on piety in which he wishes not to follow. When speaking to Euthyphro, Socrates uses this moment to help himself understand what the meaning of piety is to himself and emits to Euthyphro that he does not know.…
Euthyphro is one of Plato’s early dialogues that portrays the discussion of piety between Euthyphro, a man on his way to prosecute his father for murder, and Socrates. When pressed to explain why Euthyphro would prosecute his own father, he states that it is the pious thing to do, from which Socrates takes to mean that Euthyphro knows just what piety is (4D – 5D). Euthyphro’s first definition of piety is that of an example, that is, his own example of prosecuting a wrongdoer, regardless of that person’s relations to you (5E). Socrates finds this definition insufficient to explain what piety is; Euthyphro has only described what he is doing at this moment (6D), which is of course, not a formal definition of piety. Socrates asks not for one or two examples of pious actions but “what this form [piety] itself is” in order to use that as a model to judge other action’s piety (6E). In regards to this first definition of piety that Euthyphro gives, it seems that Socrates has committed the Socratic fallacy. He has assumed that if Euthyphro knows what piety is, he ought to be able to articulate it through a formal definition, additionally, Socrates has assumed that Euthyphro’s example does not demonstrate any knowledge of piety and therefore chooses not to even consider…
Euthyphro is a dialogue between Socrates and a traveling cleric. The two men meet at court, where the cleric, Euthyphro, claims to have a clear definition of piety. Socrates exclaims that he wishes to know the definition of piety so that he may better defend himself in his upcoming trial. Euthyphro agrees to teach Socrates, and so they begin to discuss. Early on, Socrates makes clear his desire for a universal truth, or a definition of piety that will be true in every case. Euthyphro makes several attempts to define piety in a way that satisfies Socrates.…
Present the three definitions that Euthyphro uses in his response to Socrates, and then explain how Socrates refutes each of Euthyphro’s definitions.…
The book was supposed to analyze and represent the things that Socrates had to go through to his trial. Socrates was on trial after he had been accused of corrupting the youth and being a busybody (Irvine). In his trial, Socrates defended himself by indicating that he was just performing the tasks that he was expected to accomplish by his God. He stated that the God has declared him to be wiser than all people on the planet.…
Pursuing Piety Euthyphro is a text written by Plato, about a debate between Socrates and Euthyphro on the subject of piety and holiness, rich with Socratic irony, Socrates pretends to be clueless on the subject and asks Euthyphro what his thoughts are on the subject of piety and what makes an action pious, however Euthyphro starts digging himself a bigger and bigger hole even though he initially posed as almost an expert on piety, Socrates finally shows him how ignorant he truly is on the subject, however the Before the debate starts, Euthyphro tells Socrates he is there at the porch of the King Archon because he is persecuting his father for murder, Socrates seems shocked that Euthyphro would persecute his own father and tells him that…
The paramount political principle that guided Socrates in Book 5 is the process of acquiring knowledge. This knowledge would be employed to study the concept of an ideal existence. This model existence consisted of a society within a city state which was supported and guarded by an elite group of guardians (451e). In this hierarchal space, Socrates equated the male and female guardians of this society with guard dogs (451e). Guard dogs by their nature and growth would embody certain qualities.…
Socrates was being held on charges of impiety and Euthyphro was currently prosecuting his own father for murder charges. However, Socrates points out the fact that the act of prosecuting one’s own father was impious. Euthyphro simply replies that he has a clear understanding as what is pious and impious and stating that what he is doing is pious because of the sin his father had committed. Murdering someone showed a high level of impiety, and that action needs to be punished. This dilemma then leads for Socrates and Euthyphro to discuss how an action or object becomes pious or impious.…
In summation of chapter 12, Socrates is discussing the difference between praise and honor to suggest that an object of praise, i.e. virtue, is inferior to an object of honor, i.e. happiness. To start off the section, Socrates proposes that: Objects of praise are praised for character in relation to something else as well as their actions and achievements. This praise is different than the praise given to the gods, for they cannot be referred to our standard of good.…