Preview

Socrates and the Defintion of Piety

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
447 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates and the Defintion of Piety
Socrates on the Definition of Piety
Plato's dialog called Euthyphro is about a discussion that took place between Socrates and Euthyphro concerning the meaning of piety, or one's duty to both gods and to humanity. Socrates has recently been charged with impiety and is about to be tried before the Athenian court while Euthyphro is on trial for murder. Because Socrates knew that the Athenian people did not understand the meaning of piety, Socrates asks Euthyphro to answer the question "What is piety?" He wants to see if Euthyphro is as wise as he claims to be, and if he is not, Socrates will debunk his claim. Socrates is anxious to find out about the nature of piety since Meletus has accused him of the crime of impiety. Socrates addresses this question to Euthyphro, "What is piety?" Euthyphro answers that piety is bringing charges against one who has done wrong, even though that person happens to be his own father. Socrates is not satisfied with that answer and insist that a proper definition of piety must include all parts of morality.
In reply, Euthyphro says, "Piety is what is dear to the gods and impiety is that which is not dear to them” (p.420). Socrates then concludes it be no more satisfactory than the previous one. It is not clear what makes anything dear to the gods, or if what is dear to some of the gods is dear to all. Socrates then asks Euthyphro if people who are pious are also just. Euthyphro answers yes, but not all just persons are pious. Socrates then wants to know if piety is a part of justice, and if it is, what part? Euthyphro replies that piety is that part of justice that attends to the gods, just as there is another part of justice that attends to men. This, too, is unsatisfactory because we do not know what "attends" means. At this point, Euthyphro states that there are various ways in which men can minister to the gods, but he does not point them out.
Socrates still insists that he does not know what piety is since Euthyphro cannot

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This reading is so confusing, I read it three times and still have some confusion about the Socrates statements. Basically, it is a conversation or arguments between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is in the court because a man whose name is Meletus prosecuted him about corrupting the youth. Therefore, Euthyphro is in the court to prosecute his father for the murder of the servant. It is not proven that his father is killer but Euthyphro is trying to get justice on behalf of the servant. Euthyphro thinks that a person has to pay if he/she does something impiety. Euthyphro explains that piety is something the dear to god and impiety is the thing that you do and god does not like. Euthyphro is trying to explain Socrates that he has knowledge…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno's Paradox

    • 1703 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At Euthyphro 9e, Euthyphro claims that the pious is that which is loved by all the gods. In effect, he is claiming that the pious and the god-loved are identical. In reply to this claim, Socrates argues that “If the god-loved and the pious were the same, my dear Euthyphro, then if the pious was being loved because it was pious, the god-loved would also be being loved because it is god-loved.” Socrates is essentially arguing that if the ‘pious’ and the ‘god-loved’ are, in fact, identical, you should be able to use the terms interchangeably without changing the truth value of a particular statement.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with what your saying, I think Socrates understood what everything he was asking Euthyphro about the gods and what they believed in and didn't believe in. When Euthyphro told him that somethings are right by god and wrong by other gods which makes action that people were doing maybe holy/sinful. Socrates wanted to make Euthyphro stop moving fast and slow down and actually think about what he was saying because turning in his father maybe both wrong/right by the gods he was just making his self believe it was the right…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How does Socrates explain the nature of piety (holiness)? In Euthyphro, Socrates tries to make Euthyphro understand the nature of piety without reference to God or religion. Socrates does this by asking Euthyphro whether piety “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved”. Socrates is going about this using metaethical inquiry.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro, a religious expert, who he runs into outside of a courthouse in Athens. Socrates was being indicted on the charges of corrupting the youth, and Euthyphro was prosecuting his own father for murder. Socrates was bewildered as to why Euthyphro would indict his own blood of a crime. In an attempt to explain to Socrates why it was the right thing to do, Euthyphro proclaims that he is acting piously by taking his father to court. Euthyphro adds that his relatives are mad at him because “it is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder. But their ideas of the divine attitude to piety and impiety are wrong” (4e). Because of this, Socrates enquires about what Euthyphro believes piety truly is, to which he provides his four definitions that Socrates ultimately disagrees with.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Euthyphro unexpectedly run into each other outside of the Athens courthouse. Euthyphro went to the courthouse to prosecute his father for killing one of his servants, who was a murderer. Socrates was summoned to court to be charged with disturbing the youth. After Euthyphro stated his business at the courthouse, Socrates assumes that he must be a religious expert if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a serious charge. Euthyphro then agrees with Socrates that he does indeed know all there is to know about what is holy. Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him what holiness is, in hope that it will help with his trial.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato's Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates' final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens' laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates' accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reading Euthyphro, Plato’s end goal is to show that there is no rational relationship between “the pious” and “to be loved by the Gods.” The point of Socrates argument is that he is ultimately asking Euthyphro to explain piety by questioning the characteristics of something that is loved. Is something loved because it is good, is it loved because it is popular, what makes something loved?…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this dialogue, Socrates is attempting to defense himself at the trial and prove his innocence, while others are trying to put him to death for introducing strange gods and corrupting the youth. Socrates's first sentence sets the tone and direction for the whole dialogue. Socrates, in addressing the men of Athens, states that he almost forgets who he is because of…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro is one of Plato’s early dialogues that portrays the discussion of piety between Euthyphro, a man on his way to prosecute his father for murder, and Socrates. When pressed to explain why Euthyphro would prosecute his own father, he states that it is the pious thing to do, from which Socrates takes to mean that Euthyphro knows just what piety is (4D – 5D). Euthyphro’s first definition of piety is that of an example, that is, his own example of prosecuting a wrongdoer, regardless of that person’s relations to you (5E). Socrates finds this definition insufficient to explain what piety is; Euthyphro has only described what he is doing at this moment (6D), which is of course, not a formal definition of piety. Socrates asks not for one or two examples of pious actions but “what this form [piety] itself is” in order to use that as a model to judge other action’s piety (6E). In regards to this first definition of piety that Euthyphro gives, it seems that Socrates has committed the Socratic fallacy. He has assumed that if Euthyphro knows what piety is, he ought to be able to articulate it through a formal definition, additionally, Socrates has assumed that Euthyphro’s example does not demonstrate any knowledge of piety and therefore chooses not to even consider…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue, rather than being a teachable piece of knowledge, seems to be an innate understanding. Every person in the world, save perhaps psychopaths and sociopaths, naturally has a strong moral compass. An example that proves this idea is the innocence of children. I have never witnessed a child perform an action with solely malicious intent. Children always have some outside motivation for any hateful actions they perform, so they never do it only to hurt someone. At this point you might think that, yes, children do not do anything with only malicious purposes, but the fact remains that they continue to perform such actions. This is true, but honestly, how have children learned to do such hateful things? No child would consider cursing at anyone if they were angry, but since they observe others performing these actions, the children begin to develop the idea in their minds that doing so must relieve their suffering. It seems, then, that humans learn harmful…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Hidden Intent

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Towards the end of the dialogue, Socrates begins to believe that he is getting somewhere with Euthyphro. Just a few more questions and Euthyphro will be fully enlightened. Or will he? Socrates begins to make his closing argument, and is ready for Euthyphro's final words on the subject. He starts, "Then either we were wrong before, or, if we were right then, we are wrong now… we must begin again and ask, what is holiness? That is an inquiry which I shall never be tired of pursuing as far as I can." (p. 13) He goes on to ask for Euthyphro's word once again. The response he receives this time though is unexpected. "Another time, Socrates, for I am in a hurry and must go now." (p. 13) This is the end of the "Euthyphro." Perhaps not much of an ending since nothing is resolved, however that may have been the idea. Leaving the question unanswered, Socrates unfulfilled, and problems unresolved…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    <br>Traditionally justice was regarded as one of the cardinal virtues; to avoid injustices and to deal equitable with both equals and inferiors was seen as what was expected of the good man, but it was not clear how the benefits of justice were to be reaped. Socrates wants to persuade from his audience to adopt a way of estimating the benefits of this virtue. From his perspective, it is the quality of the mind, the psyche organization which enables a person to act virtuously. It is this opposition between the two types of assessment of virtue that is the major theme explored in Socrates' examination of the various positions towards justice. Thus the role of Book I is to turn the minds from the customary evaluation of justice towards this new vision. Through the discourse between Cephalus, Polemarchus and Thrasymachus, Socaretes' thoughts and actions towards justice are exemplified. Though their views are different and even opposed, the way all three discourse about justice and power reveal that they assume the relation between the two to be separate. They find it impossible to understand the idea that being just is an exercise of power and that true human power must include the ability to…

    • 2424 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates is a man who relies on his manipulative tricks of rhetoric and cunning wisdom to dismantle and disprove his opponents of conversation. “What is the pious, and what the impious, do you say?” (6) Socrates asks one of these opponents, a man named Euthyphro, who is at court to prosecute his own father - an action which Euthyphro thinks to be pious. Socrates asks Euthyphro to define piety, and as he does so, Socrates uses their conversation to mock and twist Euthyphro’s words so they contradict themselves. Socrates wishes for Euthyphro to give him a general answer to the question of all things pious and impious.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism: Rachels

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Euthyphro, Socrates asks an important question concerning the nature of piety. Socrates is skeptical and asks, "Is conduct right because the gods command it, or do the gods command it because it is right?" This question is very significant and has become one of the most famous questions in philosophy. Antony Flew, the British philosopher, thinks that whether a person can grasp and force the point of this proposed question, is a good determiner of their aptitude for philosophy. The significance is this: if we accept the theological conception of right and wrong- we're caught in a major dilemma. Socrates' question requires us to clarify what we mean.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays