Preview

Stages of Team Development

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
316 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stages of Team Development
STAGES OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT

The 4 stages that all teams go through are:

• Forming • Storming • Norming • Performing

The Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965. He said that these phases are all necessary and vital for the team to grow, to face up to challenges, to tackle problems, to find solutions, to plan work, and to deliver results.

Forming Stage 1

The team meets and learns about the opportunity and challenges, and then agrees on goals and begins to tackle the tasks. The individuals do not know each other well therefore relationships are very formal.

At this stage efforts should be made to help the team to get to know each other as feelings, weaknesses and mistakes are covered up and there is no shared understanding of what needs to be done.

Storming Stage 2

In the storming stage different ideas compete for consideration as members are starting to communicate honestly. The team addresses issues such as what problems they are really supposed to solve, how they will function independently and together. Team members open up to each other and confront each other's ideas and perspectives testing each others strengths and weaknesses.

Norming Stage 3

Team members adjust their behavior to each other as confidence and trust begins to emerge. Team members often work through this stage by agreeing on rules as they realise that they can work together. During this phase, team members begin to trust each other therefore they listen to each others opinions and take them into consideration

Performing Stage 4

At this stage teams are able to function as a unit as they find ways to get the job done smoothly and effectively without inappropriate conflict. Team member’s focus on the task as hierarchy becomes of little importance as the team uses the diverse strengths of the team

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The second stage is the storming stage. During this stage of group development, the members of the group accept the existence of the group but are against the restraints put on individual creativity. This can lead to serious problems if there is not some sort of compromise or agreement put in place on allowing individuals to be creative within the guidelines of the project.…

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 4 MGT311

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The second stage, called storming, can sometimes create a little conflict within the group but is essential because it allows everyone to come up with a “game plan” and or ideas as to how we can attack this task successfully bases on his or her own experiences. Norming comes into play once everyone has heard each other out. It is here where the team starts to work effectively together because they have now formed some level of respect for one another’s opinions and differences.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 591

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, here is a summary of the development stages of a team. In the forming stage, team members come togetherand form initial impressions. They socialize in order to get to know each other and bond with other team members. In the storming stage, team members experience hostility and infighting over tasks and how the team works. In the norming stage, team members start to come together and realize what needs to be accomplished. In the performing stage, team members are well-organized and well-functioningand maintain a positive balance. In the adjourning stage, team members achieve closure when the project is accomplished.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    MGT 3100 Project 2

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The storming phase of our team development was simply caused by the difficult time we had getting our project proposal approved. This lead to frustration because the project was not meeting our earlier expectations. Our team became worried that we were not going to be able to meet our goal as we began to express our concerns to each other. I do not believe this frustration was targeted to any members of the group or to the management process its self but simply to the expectations of the assignment. In this stage we had to challenge each others ideas since these ideas were ultimately competing for consideration. However, I think this confrontation was handled well and was ultimately healthy for the group and for the outcome of the project.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 31 1.3

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development every team goes through stages of development known as forming, storming, norming…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The next step is Storming, this is important for the growth of the group. This stage distinguishes the strong groups from the weaker ones as some group do not make it past this stage. Relationships between team members will be made or broken at this stage and some may never recover. It is important for the team to have a strong facilitative leadership at this stage.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce Tuckman has a theory which contains of four stages; these are forming, storming, norming and performing. His theory is about group development. The first stage is forming, this is when a group is reliant on one particular leader, if the leader is not there and someone else tries to take charge then the confusion starts. The leader makes sure every individual is aware of their role, if the leader does not make them aware, then their roles and responsibilities are unclear. For example in a class room everyone will be speaking to each other, when the teacher comes in and tells everyone to settle down then they will do so. The second stage is storming, at this stage everyone hasn’t settled into a task, they are all busy chatting amongst their selves and deciding who should be in charge. Decisions don’t come easily within a group it takes some time to come to an agreement. You start to form your own cliques and groups. People in the group may challenge each other in order to come out on top. Being focused it top priority for every individual, concentrating on achieving their goals and not being distracted by relationships and emotional issues, to enable progress to be made you may have to compromise within the group members. The third stage is Norming, this is when all members of the group have come to agreement on their roles and have accepted their individual responsibilities. Big decisions are made amongst group agreement were as minor decisions may be given to individuals or small groups within the whole group. Within the group commitment is getting stronger and unity is made everyone has a clear picture of what is happening. Now all the problems are over fun and social activates can now take place within the group and the leader has now earned every members respect and trust. The last stage is performing, the team is more strategically aware; the team members know what they are doing and why they are doing so,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Syer & Connolly (1996) describes a “team system” as a group of people who constitute a system of interrelated entities and whose members share a common goal. They argue that team members need to develop awareness of themselves and each other, and of their differences, through giving descriptive feedback. This allows appreciation of differences, good contact and improved communication. Trust, respect, team spirit and synergy may then emerge. Consequently this leads to a highly developed awareness. The notion of a cycle more easily suggests the kind of continuous process that teams go through and need to revisit as new members are introduced or members leave. This model suggest that skill and attention are required from the manager and team members. A key role of the manager is to enable team members to work together on their tasks. This involves thinking about the history of the team as well as the individual and also requires the manager to promote their ability to work together as group. The following shows the cycle of developing team working skills based on Syer & Connolly 1996.…

    • 3377 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second stage of group development is known as the storming stage. The storming stage is where the conflicts and competition are at its greatest. This happens because the team members have an understanding of the task and a general feel for who they are as a team and who group members are, they feel confident and begin to address some of the more important issues surrounding the group. Such issues can relate to things like the group’s tasks, individual roles and responsibilities or even with the team members themselves. They have different opinions on what should be done and how it should be done. Each team member wonders whether or not his or her ideas will be respected or not, so the team members compete with each other for status and…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The features of effective team performance are set out in Brian Tuckman’s phases of team development theory, ‘Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing.’ This outlines the phases that a team will go through in order to become effective and reach maturity. At the ‘Forming’ stage of team development individual roles and responsibilities are unclear and each member of the team is concerned to avoid conflict with each other. From this point the team will go through the ‘Storming’ phase which is when they start to conflict as individuals put forward ideas which will be challenged by others in a bid to gain power and position over others. After this the ‘Norming’ phase follows and it is at this point that individual roles are defined and accepted and ground rules and conduct are agreed. After each of these stages the team then reaches the ‘Performing’ stage which is where they are all working towards the same shared goal. This theory shows that for all teams to be effective each individual needs to be clear on their role, responsibilities and shared end goal. This is achieved through positive leadership, utilising the skills of the team and addressing weaknesses to make the team more effective.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this stage team members should know one another better (start to appreciate eachothers differences and strengths) and also may bond with one another. Discussions are developing as they…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Decisions aren’t made straight easily with a group of people . People within the group position view as they attempt to establish themselves in relation to other team members and the leader, who might receive challenges from team members. Clarity of purpose increases but plenty of uncertainties persist. Cliques and factions form and there may be power struggles. The team needs to be focused on its goals to avoid becoming distracted by relationships and emotional issues. Compromises may be required to enable progress.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group Project

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Forming: During this stage of the team, there is a desire to be accepted and to avoid conflict; The tasks are allotted according the skills and abilities of the persons. The tendency during this stage is to study the other members and avoid confrontation. The team members get to know each other. It is planned that this…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Tam & Mgi Team Case

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In forming the stage, members were brought into the team at different times. For example, Dav Clark was not introduced until the third meeting. There were some conflicts and confusion among the group members in the storming stage. The confusion about group roles arose when Sasha felt Dana and Henry were merely interns. Dav and Igor, the other team members, saw Dana and Henry as strategic contributors to the business. In the norming stage, the group usually starts to work together, conflict is reduced, and team confidence increases. However, in this case, the team failed to establish proper ground rules and values, not allowing the team to function successfully. There were still disagreements between Sasha, Henry and Dana. Since no information regarding rules and norms had been formally discussed in the norming stage, the problems amongst the team followed them to the performing stage. The performing stage was unsuccessful because the team did not achieve their goal of finishing their task on time. The business plan was not completed by the appropriated time. In the final adjourning stage, due to the disagreements between group members, the task of completing the business plan was not accomplished in the allotted timeframe.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In stage two, which is storming, is the stage where conflicts over leadership and task distribution occur. While they may try to resist the power of the others, they may also withdraw themselves from the group as they find it hard to cooperate with each other. As long as the conflicts are not solved, the group cannot progress into the next stage of development. Once conflicts are solved, groups are then allowed to progress to the third stage which is norming. In this stage, group members are familiar and well adapted to the guidelines and standards of the group. Cooperation and commitment ensures the group to carry out their task in a harmony environment and communication between them is much more effective than before.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays