No matter who is elected head of the executive branch, it is important that they’re held accountable for the performance of the cabinet members whom they have appointed. Failure to do so creates an aura of lazy government, and can eventually prove that cabinet’s ability, or inability, to successfully administer the laws of the United States, a task the executive branch was enumerated in the …show more content…
The executive branch is a series of bodies, both chosen by the president and independently sanctioned, who are tasked with helping administer the law and generally help the President reach his enumerated task of “taking care to see that the laws are faithfully executed”. The executives functions range from ensuring safety to regulating interest rates, spans from the oval office to field offices around the country, and is consistent of career politicians, policy experts, and independent officers. The size of the bureaucratic system in place has been an ongoing debate in American politics. Some argue that the amount of people employed by the federal government is too large, while others believe that it is proportionately small to a country of our size. Debate aside, one thing is certain: Americans rely on bureaus on a daily basis, and the positions that oversee these services offered are too necessary to the “American Dream” to be toyed around with, or given to an unqualified or undedicated administrator. Law is important, it is what we are rooted in and what gives us a standing in this world. But law is only written, and it is not officially law until brought to fruition by a capable