Preview

Summary Of 'Cannibals All, Or, Slaves Without Masters'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of 'Cannibals All, Or, Slaves Without Masters'
Slavery Is Not Always A Bad Thing
In the passage “Cannibals All, or, Slaves Without Masters”, George Fitzhugh presents a pro slavery argument that attempts to persuade abolitionists to be pro-slavery, and in doing so uses effective rhetorical devices to conclude his view on the subject at hand. Fitzhugh opens up the topic stating that slavery is what most individuals think it is, wrong. He then argues how slavery is superior to free labor because slaves are treated pleasant. Slavery is extremely vital to the survival of lives because without it, individuals would starve. Abolition was never a big problem until negro slavery was made and now abolition is mainly directed against negro slavery. While some of Fitzhugh’s audience may disagree

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He writes, “The abolition of the slave trade was supposed to be the certain death of slavery. Cut off the stream, and the pond will dry up, was the common notion at this time” (345). However, the South was set in their beliefs and they refused to change. Since the problem stemmed from…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery is infamously known in American history as “America’s greatest shame”. Accompanied by the concept of slavery was vast opposition due to it being unconstitutional and contradicting the basis of American government. Benjamin Banneker writes a simple letter to Thomas Jefferson that effectively argues against the institution of slavery utilizing political appeals, irony, repetition, and a snarky tone.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Chapter 16 Readings

    • 1917 Words
    • 6 Pages

    7) Summary: In this passage written by Frederick Douglas who was an escaped slave that became known as the greatest Black abolitionist of the time for sharing his terrible experience as a slave in order to stop slavery, it discusses the cruel treatments that the slaves are expose to. For instance, if the slaves perform at a poor rate or produces insufficient work, their master would hit them with a whip as a symbol of punishment. Sometimes, the master doesn’t even need a reason to torment the slaves other than for his/her own satisfaction. In addition, Douglas who was a slave for the majority of his life, claims that the laws created by the Southern states were unfair since it was design to give the master full control over the slaves which took away their freedom. Moreover, Douglas supported his idea by repeating the same phrase and adding the different things that were restricted against the slaves such as earning a proper education, receiving good food/clothes, and working hard to make money. Furthermore, Douglas asserts that the physical cruelties that are brought upon the slaves are sufficiently harassing and revolting since it inflicts on the mental, moral and religious nature of the helpless victims. All of these reasons explain why Douglas…

    • 1917 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As long as cotton was king, slaves were needed. The Mindset of the South: Cannibals All! Fitzhugh’s first foray in publication, an 1851 pamphlet entitled “What Shall be Done With the Free Negroes?” called for harsh restrictions on former slaves and even urged for re-enslavement. With Cannibals All!, following up Sociology for the South, Fitzhugh was not initiating a radical call for abolition but providing a criticism of Northern capitalism almost Marxist in its declaration that the “White Slave Trade” was “far more cruel” than African…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, Fitzhugh utilizes subjective diction to convince a resisting abolitionist group that slavery is not a bad deed. While some believe slavery is an immoral act towards society due to their harsh treatment, the author argues other wise saying slavery is acceptable and is needed. He explains to his readers how slavery is, “a status of society… and continually justified by Holy Writ, is its natural, normal and necessary status under ordinary circumstances” (Fitzhugh 295). Fitzhugh uses a great example of subjective diction as he specifically uses the terms, “Holy Writ” and “necessary” in order to justify his argument. He focuses on this device to demonstrate how slavery should be welcomed into this society and how it is proven by a written…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abolition of slavery is just that the abolishment of slavery, it is getting rid of slavery, setting slaves free and such. Abolition has existed forever but in the colonies, it wasn’t really something they thought or worried about too much even during the American revolution, because there wasn’t much of a slavery problem at that point in time. Lord Dunmore’s proclamation was such a huge deal because he pretty much insinuated that everyone were slaves to the king or the Penn family, they pretty much had to pick a side. The proclamation greatly influenced the Declaration of Independence because it not only pointed out that they were pawns who had to pick a side it made them truly realize how unfairly they were being treated.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the narrative of Frederick Douglass, during the 19th Century, the conditions slaves experienced were not only cruel, but inhumane. It is a common perception that “cruelty” refers to the physical violence and torture that slaves endure. However, in this passage, Douglass conveys the degrading treatment towards young slaves in the plantation, as if they were domesticated animals. The slaves were deprived of freedom and basic human rights. They were not only denied of racial equality, they weren’t even recognized as actual human beings.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an oppressive time in history. Nothing good came from it, only hatred against others for the color of their skin, violence against them because the whites saw themselves as a superior, intellectual, and more dominant race. Some historians believe that life for slaves may have been different than what we’ve been taught by traditional historians, but how could it have been different. They weren’t treated any better. They were whipped, beaten, looked down upon, they have recorded chattels, where animals were treated better.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Lincoln-Douglas Debate Number One: Ottawa August 21, Lincoln states, “I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself. I hate it because it deprives our republican example of its just influence in the world—enables the enemies of free institutions, with plausibility, to taunt us as hypocrites—causes the real friends of freedom to doubt our sincerity”. Now for Lincoln to say such sincere words about slavery, shows that he emancipated slaves for the right reasons and with nothing but good intentions. Lincoln’s intention to free all slaves of their injustice substantiates his worthiness to have the title of “the Great Emancipator”, regardless of what Frederick Douglass had to say.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    audience’s outlook on slavery. In addition, the passage on page 380 also shows how Auld’s…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Baptist Anti-Slavery

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “We propose,” it reads, “to endeavor to remove this ignorance [of the true nature of Slavery] by the circulation of publications depicting its true character, and its appropriate remedy” (10). The Constitution therefore conceives the primarily problem of slavery as one of ignorance. At issue, then, is unveiling what slavery really is, which the Constitution assumes will make abolition appear as the only appropriate remedy. This assumption is worth dwelling on: what is entailed in viewing the persistence of slavery as primarily a problem of ignorance? How would the Society respond to charges that there are many, especially in the South in the heart of plantation slavery, who know slavery quite well, yet are anti-abolition? One answer, on the basis of the Constitution so far, is that those that maintain the tolerance or slavery, or, further, are politically committed to its maintenance, do so because of prejudice against people of color. Slavery is fundamentally related to the problem of racism. This more fundamental problem, according to the Constitution, could also be cast as a problem of ignorance. Racism, as a system and culture arranged by racial hierarchy, is about not knowing the truth about fellow human…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    [Present in Past, 214]. He believed the overall employment of slaves and not whites would help reduce the number of beggars in the south in comparison of white employees of the industrial North who could quite or not work if they did not want to. That in James Henry Hammond was a problem because you could not control or dictate your employees and were bounded to the laws of the United States. George Fitzhugh also believed that slavery was a positive because, it was used over the course of history.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the ironies of the Civil War era and the end of slavery in the United States has always been that the man who played the role of the Great Emancipator was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of two million black slaves, has never entirely shaken off the imputation that he was something of a half-heart about it. "There is a counter-legend of Lincoln," acknowledges historian Stephen B. Oates, "one shared ironically enough by many white southerners and certain black Americans of our time" who are convinced that Lincoln never intended to abolish slavery--that he "was a bigot...a white racist who championed segregation, opposed civil and political rights for black people" and "wanted them all thrown out of the country." That reputation is still linked to the 19th-century denunciations of Lincoln issued by the abolitionist vanguard.…

    • 5760 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While running for Senator in 1858, he ensured that the general public knew he was not an abolitionist. He achieved this by using racist rhetoric and confirming that black people should not, nor should they ever, have equality to whites. He says to a crowd during a speech, “I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races” (Document 1). Leaders don’t throw insults and degradations at the people they are supposed to protect. His lack of compassion and even basic recognition for their humanity shows that he is not an abolitionist leader, and instead uses the issue of black slaves as a way to promote his own political career by persuading the audience of his societally accepted…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people during this time thought that slavery should be abolished. However, just because these individuals thought slavery should be done away with does not mean that every one of them actually voiced their concerns and stood up for the slaves. For example, George Washington was a slave owner himself, but after fighting a huge battle for his own independence he soon began rethinking being a slave owner. Washington never voiced his opinion on slavery, but freed every one of his slaves in his will. Many people thought that slavery should be abolished because of the way that it violated the slave’s human rights and gave the so called masters total control and the ability to dictate. Phyllis Wheatley was one of the many people that fought for the enslaved African American. Phyllis was a writer who wrote and spoke about the injustice of slavery. James Otis was a white colonist that believed slavery was “a huge violation of the law of nature.” John Allen shares the same beliefs as Otis and did all that he could to let his voice be heard and free slaves.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays