Preview

Summary: The Ideology Of Samuel Alito Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
594 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Ideology Of Samuel Alito Justice
The Supreme Court of the United State is balanced by the justices’ ideologies which are liberal and conservative. These two ideologies are the principle of equality before the law because the justices’ ideology and their votes on the Court have a strong relationship. It is fairly common that justices decide cases based on their own policy preferences. According to “Gate Ways to Democracy” (514), we have the figure which shows the ideology of the Supreme Court Justices in 2014 in ranking from the most liberal to the most conservative that is started from Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, to Clarence Thomas. Through the figure, Sonia Sotomayor is the most liberal justice, and Clarence Thomas is the most conservative justice. After Thomas, Samuel Alito is supposed the second conservative justice in the Supreme Court. In this essay, we are going to identify more about the ideology of Samuel Alito justice. …show more content…
First of all, Alito is one of four Justices who rejected the Affordable Care Act strongly in the case of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius in 2012. They argued the individual mandate was unconstitutional because it represented an attempt by Congress to regulate beyond its power under the Commerce Clause, and the Individual Mandate as a tax rather than a penalty. In 2014, he wrote the 5-4 decision exempting Hobby Lobby and other closely held businesses with religious objections from the Affordable Care. In 2015, along with Scalia and Thomas, Samuel Alito continued to deliver a scathing dissent opinion to oppose the upholding of a critical component of the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell. The Republicans always oppose Obamacare very strongly, and Alito always stays where conservatives

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4.) Assess the leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality,” the author, Sunnivie Brydum, presents the different views of the justices who disagreed with the newly approved same-sex marriage bill. Recently the United States of America legalized same-sex marriage, and although five of the nine justices voted in favor of it, there were still four justices who expressed their dissent about the new law. The reasons these four justices voted against the law varied, but all four justices had made the same decision of voting against the law. Chief Justice John Roberts claims that the decision should have been made by the majority, not only the Court. The constitution says that justices are only supposed to state what the laws are in a country,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brethren Summary

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This shows through the cases each individual choses to hear, the way thereat their fellow justices, how they utilize their clerks, and how they vote. We start off with Burgers desperate search for a landmark case, he is obsessed with having a unanimous decision to show that the court, and he as a leader, remained strong. Almost in a continuation of the Warren courts desegregation rulings, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education brought the landmark decision facing the topic of busing and integration versus desegregation. It was very difficult for the justices to come to a unanimous decision especially with Black acting as a unbudging liberal strict constructionist. Eventually, visually every justice conceded a part of their opinion and a unanimous decision was reached for pro-busing, a liberal decision. The press, however picked up on how split the court really was, stated that it seemed like “two sets of views, laid side by side”. A large part of their chapter is dedicated to deliberation on overturning or turning to a narrower interpretation of Miranda v. Arizona, the exclusionary rule, and Mapp v. Ohio. The fact that none of those attempts were successful was another win for a liberal court that Burger had not envisioned. In 1970 many people are upset with the war in Vietnam, and with their government. This leads to Cohen v California regarding free speech, Clay v U.S.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He went on to become Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, then 8 years later he was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals by Ronald Regan. During Regan’s presidency, Scalia was appointed, and confirmed by the senate to be one of the Associate Justices on the Supreme Court (Reilly, 2016). Antonin Scalia earned his place on the Supreme Court through hard work, and dedication to the Judicial System throughout his career. Scalia’s voice will never be forgotten because he remained to have a strong conservative view throughout his career, and always vocalized his opinions on issues brought forth in the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Magtadt defines liberals has typically holding civil rights close to heart. They are often the primary defenders of individuals or groups that they see as victims of past discrimination, such as racial minorities, women and the poor (p. 37, 2015). Although identifying as independent she has quite often voted along with the liberal side of the Supreme Court. However, it can be said that unlike other liberals Sotomayor takes a more case-by-case approach. Sotomayor has shown a willingness to side with conservative in cases pertaining to criminal law, no doubt an influence of her time as prosecutor. For example, in Wetzel v. Lambert back in February 2010, she sided with the conservative bloc’s majority opinion to reinstituting a convict’s death…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most intriguing element of the Constitution of the United States is the Independent Judiciary, in which judicial power for the country lies in the federal courts and operates separately from the legislative and executive branches. This institution allows for the civil settlement of conflicts and enables the fair application of the law to cases. Judicial independence ensures that federal judges aren’t punished for their decisions related to court cases and aren’t inhibited by political figures in their interpretation of the law. This tenet of the Constitution is the foundation for the generalized success and transparency of our standing judicial system and is why it has been the model for numerous systems across the globe. James Madison’s Federalist Number 51 is a fundamental interpretation of the concept of judicial independence delineated in the Constitution.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia was a very wise, smart educated man who was driven by politics. “He was born in Trenton, New Jersey, March 11, 1936. He married Maureen McCarthy and has nine children named, Ann Forrest, Eugene, John Francis, Catherine Elisabeth, Mary Clare, Paul David, Matthew, Christopher James, and Margaret Jane. He received his A.B. from Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School, and was a Sheldon Fellow of Harvard University from 1960–1961. He was working in a private practice in Cleveland, Ohio from 1961–1967, a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia from 1967–1971. In 1972, Antonin Scalia entered public service when President Nixon appointed him general counsel for the Office of Telecommunications Policy where he helped formulate regulations for the cable television industry. And he also was a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago from 1977–1982, and a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University and Stanford University” (Court, 2013).so he had his hands tied up in a lot of different important places with many important people.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Antonin Scalia is an American Associate Justice in the United States Supreme Court. He was appointed by President Ronald Regan in September 26, 1986 and preceded by William Rehnquist. He also sits as the longest serving justice on the court. Justice Scalia is well known for his dissents, where he uses a colorful style of writing when opposing his colleagues.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, interpretation of the law from one judge to another can be different. Many times Supreme Court Justices use their own personal political ideology to interpret laws…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earl Warren served as Chief Justice on the U.S Supreme Court from 1953-1969, before which he had served as Attorney General of California in 1938 and soon after served as the Governor of California. It was clear that Warren had become more liberal with age and as Chief Justice he believed “the Court [was]as a protector of the public, the means to restore ethics and mind the conducts of legislators.” (Oyez) The Warren court and its decisions brought about a significant amount of social change, rooted in establishing racial equality and protecting civil liberties. For this, the Warren Court is mistakenly labeled as liberal. The court’s decisions, especially those of Chief Justice Warren, reflected a kind of progressive thinking. Warren navigated…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Partisanship

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is important because while the judicial branch is supposed to uphold the law though judicial neutrality, they also play a big role in policy making. In Robert Dahl’s article, “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker” back in 1957, he discussed this topic in-depth, explaining that, particularly the Supreme Court, has the ability to change legislation or influence Congress’s decision, even in the face of countering a Majority Rule. Brown v Board of Education’s unanimous 9-0 ruling in 1954 is a prime example of this where the judges, many of whom had been appointed by much more conservative Presidents changed public policy regarding segregation in the schools, but through and unanimous vote, also changed the ideology, at least temporarily, of some of the judges. Bernard Schwartz’s article “Chief Justice Earl Warren: Super Chief in Action.” Talks about how the judicial session came to an end before a formal vote was cast, and the vote was 5-4 in favor of desegregation but Chief Justice Vinson, was not ready to overturn Plessy v Ferguson. He died in between the two sessions and Justice Warren was able to talk the 3 remaining dissenters into changing their vote because of the nature of the legislation and his leadership in general. So while partisanship plays a big…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays