Preview

Earl Warren: Chief Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Earl Warren: Chief Justice
Earl Warren served as Chief Justice on the U.S Supreme Court from 1953-1969, before which he had served as Attorney General of California in 1938 and soon after served as the Governor of California. It was clear that Warren had become more liberal with age and as Chief Justice he believed “the Court [was]as a protector of the public, the means to restore ethics and mind the conducts of legislators.” (Oyez) The Warren court and its decisions brought about a significant amount of social change, rooted in establishing racial equality and protecting civil liberties. For this, the Warren Court is mistakenly labeled as liberal. The court’s decisions, especially those of Chief Justice Warren, reflected a kind of progressive thinking. Warren navigated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In her open statement on the sexual harassment hearings, Anita Hill recounts the details of how Judge Clarence Thomas took advantage of working relationship between them and conducted inappropriate sexually offensive behaviors toward her. Although Hill does not feel comfortable to reveal her vulnerability, she keeps a very formal and constraining tone while she illustrates in details of the process in which Judge Thomas intentionally ignored her refusal on his innumerable invitations to social outings. Admitting to having poor judgement, Hill is still trying to portray a despicable and heinous character of Judge Clarence, and proves to the court that his illegitimate action deserves punishment.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    4.) Assess the leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mansfield called him, “the only person who could have handled this assignment.” During his twenty years as a Senator, Ervin acquired a reputation as an authority on American Constitutional Law. Throughout his political career, Ervin was known to be very conservative; he opposed many civil rights and desegregation legislation, but he had independent judgment and unyielding dedication to constitutional principles. Ervin’s leadership was necessary for this task because he was visible…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oliver Wendell Holmes was appointed to the U.S. Supreme court by President Roosevelt in 1901. He was in office for 30 years until 1932, when he retired at the age of 90. This long dedication to his job and the number of young lawyers who studied under him led Oliver to have an immense influence on the judicial system in America. Holmes’s philosophy was based not on morals but on whims of the majority. Moreover, he stated that law corresponds to that which is thought to be convenient at any given time.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The former Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger who served from 1969-1986 and was the 15th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Burger was nominated in 1969 by President Richard Nixon to replace former Chief Justice Earl Warren. During his 17 years that he served as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Burger helped make decisions on many Supreme Court cases during the time of the Burger Court. Burger’s work has changed how the judiciary system now works and changed many laws to make the United States a better place.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a person is found guilty of murder and they are given the death penalty, and later it is found that the person is innocent, you cannot correct it and bring them back to life. Is that justice? Every day in school we recite the pledge of allegiance and it states that we have justice for all but did Warren McCleskey receive the right justice? In the Preamble of the Constitution, the first thing it states is to establish justice. The Declaration of Independence states that all men are created equal and they have the rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Warren McCleskey received the death penalty after he was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court reviewed the case to figure out the proper sentence for Mr. McCleskey.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Jay was the first chief justice of the USA. He also crafted the boundaries and responsibilities of the supreme court the United States. He was born Dec. 12 1745 in New York. John Jay grew up outside of new york city, and did not move around because mom was teacher at his school. He went to King’s College, now known as Columbia University. “Jay threw himself into the political world and became a successful attorney. Jay quickly learned that the British government would not take the colonies seriously unless America declared and won a war. It was after this revelation that he began his efforts to promote revolution in the colonies.” The war was promoting young men who had experience in politician. He was appointed and John had a large role in drafting the new constitution.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since his appointment in 1986 by former President Ronald Reagan, former Associate Justice Antonin Scalia served as the Supreme Court’s most renowned conservative. Acting as a sort of conservative judicial giant in the world of American politics, Justice Scalia’s appointment provided a beacon of hope for the political conservatives of the 1980’s, up until his recent death in February 13, 2016. He accomplished many great things in his tenure, and he is perhaps most remembered for his written opinions, which brought much public attention to the Supreme Court and its actions, in a way that has never been achieved by his contemporaries. In fact, he has been a tremendous influence on how Americans view the law and the constitution, from those interested…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the civil rights era, African Americans found themselves securing multiple legal victories, consisting of decisions ruling against racial segregation and discrimination. Led by Chief Justice Earl Warren during the Civil Rights Movement, the Supreme Court embodied the idea of legal liberalism, using the law to achieve political ends. During this era, the Court used the civil rights cases brought to them to achieve social change and promote equality. The decision in Loving v. Virginia is one example illustrating the Supreme Court using its power to attain racial equality and change and reform the American society, as striking down anti-miscegenation laws wiped out the last remaining Jim Crow laws. Loving v. Virginia proves to be a…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earl Warren

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Earl Warren was a kind strong man. He was the Chief Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court. In this report you will learn about his, early life, education, career, claim to fame, death.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His aim was not so much as to join the politics of the prevailing timeframe but enhance the Court’s ability which would be considered conservative in philosophy by our modern-day explanation of judicial restraint. Next, we saw the Court inject itself into the prevailing politics of the time with Plessy v. Ferguson by declaring that “separate but equal” was constitutionally legal. This would be overturned in a 9-0 decision by the Warren Court in Brown v. Board of Education, in which the predicted verdict didn’t match the rendered…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays