Preview

take home exam

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
take home exam
Analyze the political conflicts between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans in the early republic (1790-1815), paying particular attention to their differences over economic policy and foreign affairs. Which party eventually prevailed, and why?

The Federalists were a political group who believed in strengthening the federal government versus strengthening individual states. This would make a strong central government and help build the United States. Federalists wished to be able to tax states in order to help fund federal programs, also supported the idea of a national bank, and supported efforts for federal control over interstate commerce. Prominent federalists were Alexander Hamilton and John Adams for example.

In the early republic there was a huge difference between what the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans believed should be done in order to improve the economy. Alexander Hamilton envisioned a developed American economy, as explained in document 3 of chapter 6 in Major Problems in American History. He wanted to develop the American economy by including things like the division of labor, additional employment to classes of the community not ordinarily in the business, understanding that not everyone is a farmer and allowing people to use their own talents. He also wanted to encourage immigration from other countries in order for people to have more money which would essentially create economic independence for the US. Hamilton’s ideas were contrary to what a traditional Democratic-Republican believed.

The Democratic-Republicans believed in decentralized powers; which meant letting individual states have most of the power. They wanted more power to the people, and favored freedom of speech and press. Democratic-Republicans were the party of the common man. They also believed in a strict interpretation of the constitution; meaning if it wasn’t in the constitution then the federal government had no right to control those affairs. A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was the sculptor who chiseled the rough edges of America’s economy away. He was the essential part in the plan to solve the massive war debt after the revolution. As a strong federalist, he had views that he and his party shared and were deemed fit for the refinement of America’s economy. Thomas Jefferson was his eternal rival in terms of views. Along with James Madison, Jefferson was the polar opposite to Hamilton. The two past presidents seemed to be rigid with their views concerning political strategies the United States was taking in its early decades. These men before their presidencies were rock solid anti-federalist. However, Jefferson and Madison…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hamilton v jefferson

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the Constitution was ratified, conflict began between Hamilton and Jefferson. Hamilton’s followers, the Federalist, were in favor of the new Constitution because it had a balance of power and created a central government. He believed running the country on a loose interpretation of the Constitution. In other words, whatever was not forbidden in the Constitution should be allowed in which he supported the national bank. He was more focused on expanding the economic growth of the countries to bring success and establish a strong federal government to create a great deal of tariffs on the people, which would help pay off the national debt the country was in because of war. Hamilton thought the future would prosper more if the commercial and industrial society grew. He promoted the growth of factories…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federalists were mostly developed by high-class wealthy merchants, bankers, manufactures or professional men from New England and the Atlantic Seaboard, along with farmers and Southern planters. They admired the English aristocracy. Federalists considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government. They desired high voting qualifications claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy. They favored a broad interpretation of the constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of the state’s rights and wanted an expanding bureaucracy.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists where two political parties during the 1700s and early 1800s. “The supporters of the new Constitution immediately adopted the name Federalists to describe themselves. Their opponent had to contend themselves with the negative label Anti-Federalist”(Faragher 180). The Federalist believed in a strong federal government that would over see the country for the most part, where the Anti-Federalist believed that the states should have more power and not have a great influence from the federal government. The Federalist won is most part because of the people that lived in these Anti-Federalist states wanting to adopted the constitution.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists’ envisioned a strong national government due to the fact that they thought humans were selfish. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, believed that a powerful, central government that use the rights protected in the Constitution would strengthen the state's. Moreover, Hamilton would rather have power in the capital than giving the states rights. “Real liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments,” Hamilton remarked. In order to get the strong nation and government, he desired, Hamilton made a national bank to pay off taxes, print money, and to make loans. He also wanted to expand the economy to benefit business and trade.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalism- Alexander Hamilton wanted to form a strong union with the states and federal government. He sought an increase in the power/control of the federal government over the individual states. Hamilton also wanted a bank of the State so that loans could be put out to manufacturers and commercial enterprises. He felt like it was necessary to create a large national debt so that the government's credit would be built up over time. Finally, he wanted to place/raise tariffs on foreign goods to promote American manufacturing and the affordability of the products.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton Implied Powers

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, was a firm believer in the construction of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution. This broad interpretation would allow for more government control of the people. He also envisioned a political system run by the capable men of the aristocracy. Hamilton felt that for a government to be run efficiently, it must be run by the educated (of this period, the only ones educated were the rich who could afford the training). The role of the new government of the time was to encourage economic enterprise.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the American Revolutionary war, the budding country was deeply in debt. People had different ideas on how to pay off this debt, later leading to the formation of political parties. The Federalist Party was formed and they believed that it was in the new country’s best interest to have a strong centralized…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton believed that since The United States was growing as a new nation, they could take advantage of it and use it as a source of energy and cohesion. Furthermore, his main goal was just to spark up the economy and revive it to the point where it was normally flowing. So, his first idea was to completely eradicate all national and stately debt. He wanted to look at the accumulated debt of the Revolutionary War at face value and completely do away with it. Also, he wanted to create a budget for the country with allowed them just enough money to get by and not create any more debt. A federal tax system was also thought of to help bring the nation into financial clearance. The nation would…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican Party is ideologically conservative. This means that they seek to defend the political, economic and social status quo and therefore tend to oppose changes in the institutions and structures of society. The Democrat Party on the other hand are a liberal party. They seek to change the political, economic and social staus quo in favour of the well-being, rights and liberties of the individual, and especially those who are generally disadvantaged in society. However there are some in the Democrat Party that do not fit into the ideological definition of liberal.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take Home Test

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Females are usually used as the sidekicks where as males are the ones who are usually used as the big hero. Females are never portrayed as beautiful, smart, strong characters; they are not empowered like men are. For example in Scooby Doo the character Velma is smart but unattractive. Cartoons like Scooby Doo enforce traditional stereotypes, in this case there is a stereotype saying that women cannot be both beautiful and smart at the same time. Like with the Smurfette, she is the only female in the Smurf show and she has blond hair, a dress and according to the Female Action Hero’s article is all too caring, basically meaning that she is just a dumb blonde. Another example is in the popular Powerpuff Girls show, each little girl reflects a common female cartoon stereotype. In this case one is smart, one is sweet, and one is a tomboy. There was an increase in female action heroes in children’s cartoons after they discovered that these shows appealed to young girls not only boys. Shows like sailor moon started airing; however there was still a big amount of stereotypes involved that make these female action heroes somewhat negative role models for younger girls. We are telling girls to take the second seat and let the men be the big hero. In other words men are seen as being superior. The social expectations of women are taken into consideration; a woman cannot possibly do…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists were a group supported by large farmers, traders, artisans who wanted a stronger national government and the ratification of the Constitution; also they were a well-organized group. In the other hand Anti federalist were a group supported by Small farmers, often from rural areas who though that the states would lose influence thanks to the growth of the national government’s power. As we can see these two groups had different points of view. Anti-Federalists believed that the government should be ruled by the common man. Contrary to this, the Federalists believed the government should be ruled by the elite.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 2 Take Home

    • 542 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the Career Management Process, I currently find myself somewhere between step two, reality check, and step three, goal setting. While I have not undergone step one, self-assessment, specifically for this assignment, I feel as if I have inadvertently completed this step through my time at LMU. Coming from a family atmosphere that is very academically and career focused, I have been expected to determine my “life plan” quicker and earlier than most of my classmates.…

    • 542 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays