The case against Iowa High School Athletic Association was created by Marian Boyer. Marian Boyer attended a basketball game Roosevelt Junior High School in Mason City, Iowa. Boyer, her husband and two other witnesses, Mr and Mrs Garland, sat together at the tow row bleachers. According to the case brief when the bleachers are not in use they are pushed back toward the wall. It takes three men to pull the bleachers out from their folded position and during the school year the bleachers are pulled out and pushed back two to four times a week.…
This officer observed Sanders was hold his left wrist with his right hand. This officer photographed Sanders for further documentation. Sanders was escorted to a treatment room and he was secure to the bed. Sanders complained he was in severe pain and had limiter mobility of his right hand. Sanders was scene by a doctor and stated the following "I was in the back seat of the car and adjusted my wrists and heard a popping sound" "I twisted wrong with the cuffs on" Sanders also now claimed his right shoulder was injured. Sanders also told the doctor he broke his wrist twice once in a Humvee accident and when picking up a pallet.…
Savana Redding, a thirteen-year-old at Safford Middle School, was accompanied to the Assistant Principal Wilson’s office to be questioned about a day planner that contained knives and other illegal items, including four prescription-strength, and one over-the-counter, pain relief pills.…
In Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978) (“Tennessee Valley Auth v Hill”), it was discussed whether a small endangered fish called the “snail darter” could stop the “intended transformation of the river into a 30 mile long reservoir by building the Tellico Dam. Congress had authorised funding for the project in 1967 to generate hydroelectricity, create recreational opportunities and flood control, and promote shoreline developments.” The question remains, what was the case about? Put simply, it was sustaining an environment and protection of endangered species of a little fish. Wm. Robert Irvin of the President of American River in his article in the Huffington Post stated “It was a fight to save a river, one that was itself endangered and crucial to the lives, livelihoods, and heritage of the people who loved…
The case of Thompson versus Oklahoma raises a number of issues regarding the trials and punishment of juveniles for heinous crimes. This case was argued on November 9, 1987 and involves the trial of fifteen-year-old William Wayne Thompson. Along with his older brother and two friends, William Thomspon brutally murdered Charles Keene, his sister’s husband. His motive was revenge for abusing his sister. William Thompson was a “child” according to Oklahoma law, but he was tried as an adult, convicted with murder, and sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma upheld this ruling. Because he was only fifteen years old at the time of the murder, this ruling violated the Eighth Amendment, causing this case to be brought to the Supreme…
was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade.…
At the age of 13 the White family was not ready for the ignorance hatred and fear that he would encounter from the residents of Kokomo, Indiana. Ryan wanted to live a normal life just like his peers that included going to public school. Due to their lack of education and awareness The School district of Kokomo voted to have Ryan stay at home fearing that through casual contact he would spread the virus. In 1985 Ryan’s mom files a lawsuit against school authorities for banning her son from Indiana public schools. In that same year White’s parents filed a lawsuit against the school authorities in 1985 and an Indiana Department of Education officer ruled that the school must follow the Indiana Board of Health guidelines and that White must be…
2. The petitioner, Timothy Hurst, was convicted of first degree murder and the jury recommended the death penalty to the judge in Florida, who then sentenced Hurst to death. Hurst appealed to the Florida Supreme Court and was granted resentencing. The Florida Supreme Court rejected Hurst’s argument and reaffirmed his sentence. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari.…
The Tarasoff decision defined the first two categories of reasonably foreseeable victims, a person directly named by the client as being the target, and a person that a psychologist deems identifiable by using a moment of reflection. However, since Tarasoff, other cases have helped to further shape the definition of a reasonably foreseeable victim.…
Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the…
Explain how far the views in Source B differ from those in Source A in relation to President Eisenhower and the desegregation of education.…
Upon arriving in America, the Puritans have a charter granted by the king which gives them some measure of self-government. The "Massachusetts Bay School Law" established in 1642 expressed the Puritans ideas on education, religion, and the study of a "particular" calling. Every Puritan was expected to abide by the law and to report offenders, who were consequently reprimanded or punished accordingly.…
Problem of school desegregation was widely discussed many years ago and don’t loose its actuality even in our times. This work will be denoted to this topic and we will pay our attention on the importance of desegregation at schools; also we will stop at the civil rights and discrimination. In our work we will analyze them from different sides.…
Stone, AA: The Tarasoff Decisions: suing psychotherapists to safeguard society. Harvard Law Rev 90:358-78, 1976…
In 1976, in the Tarasoff vs. The Regents of the University of California the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legal obligation on psychotherapist enforced by civil suit to warn a victim of potential harm by patient. The duty to warn became a law in most states of the United States (Herbert & Young, 2003). The Tarasoff case is based on Prosenjit Poddar, an outpatient of the mental services of the University of California Berkley who was receiving counseling from psychologist Moore. At one session Poddar had mentioned he has intentions of killing a woman, Tatiana Tarasoff. Moore than advised the authorities and campus police who then was detained but released due to having no sign of insanity. Poddar then killed Tatiana Tarasoff. As victim and family was not advice of threat and possible harm, Tarasoff family filed a suit against the board of regents and the University of California employees for their failure to warn the victim. This is when after examining the case “the duty to warn” became a law. In 2004 the Tarasoff law, “duty to warn was…