The Age-Old Debate Between Creation And Evolution

Creation or Evolutionist Stance The age-old debate between creation and evolution has divided people for generations. It has been going on since Darwin came up with his theory, called darwinism. People from there started either disagreeing or agreeing with what Darwin had discovered. This is where the theory of creation and evolutionist came to be but this is not to say that creation didn’t exist before this. Believing that we came from a God and that he created us was creationism but with no actually scientific title to it. I believe in creationism and have most of my life. Having been taught that we came from someone more intelligent than we can comprehend has always been normal concept to me. After hearing the evolutionary theory I couldn’t
I have support that our world is only several thousands years old using simple arithmetic that reveals clear mathematical logic for a young earth. This support is the human population, though some may ask how is it possible for our population to reach 6.5 billion in about six thousands years if it started with only two people. Using a bit of math it's not that hard to show it's true. If we start in the beginning with say two people and every 150 years it doubles. If we doubled 32 to times, which is only 4,800 years ago, we would almost reached 8.6 billion. For six thousands years it's not that off and for evolutionist where they say we’ve been around for hundreds of thousands of years we would have at one point have an increasing rate of zero for our population only two 6.5 billion
Diamonds have been detected to have a levels of radiocarbon (carbon-14) in diamonds. Carbon-14 dating provides some of the strongest evidence for creation and a young earth. It can’t remain in substances naturally for millions of years because of how fast they decay. Diamonds are extremely resistant to contamination. Some scientist dating some diamonds that were assumed to be millions of years old to only be around 55,000 years old. Another evidence to support earth is not that old is how steady the sun is and a problem with a billion years. Evolutionist believe that life came to be 3.8 billion years ago but if that were true the sun would be 25% brighter today than back. Paleontologists though suggest that if anything, the earth was warmer in the past. Evolutionist would have to come up with unrealistic assumptions of far great greenhouse or much more CO2 in the atmosphere than there is today. The belief that Earth is only 6,000 year old would mean there is no significant increase in energy. It's more difficult for people who have old-age ideas.
To support that life didn’t just happen would be again supporting creation. The second law of thermodynamics states that things tend to go from order to disorder,entropy tends to increase unless energy is added. In which is saying that DNA and RNA couldn’t have evolved spontaneously into living cells. There have been laboratory experiments on the theories of the origin