Preview

The Benefits Of Nonviolent Revolutions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Benefits Of Nonviolent Revolutions
Violence and bloodshed are terrible things to sacrifice in the course of a Revolution, but are the only effective ways one could possibly occur. It is impossible for any other method to be more effective in achieving a revolution other than violence and bloodshed. Mankind has use this method for tens of thousands of years, and is the only form of governmental rebellion used. Some other forms of government has been tried, but none other were more successful than the original method of brute force. Nonviolent revolutions are extremely ineffective in the sense of trying to rebel against the government. The people of a nation would have no way to take control in the government. Without the use of violence, the people have no power. The government …show more content…
The government is not afraid to use violence, even if you are. If the people of a nation do not use violence, the government can still resort the their military in order to take down the people. The government is only trying to do what is right for them in order to stay in power. Also, when not using violence and harmful threats against the government, they will not be under any pressure to make decisions quickly. Since no actual force is being used on them, the government does not need to rush decisions, as there are no consequences of waiting. In a revolution with violence and bloodshed, the government will be rushed into making a decision in order to prevent any more harm to people. Most of the time, the government will try to save as many lives as possible, and surrender to the people quickly. On an economical view, revolutions with violence and bloodshed will not be destructive the economy. The many deaths of fighting will not change the lifestyles' of the people too much, as only the men would be going to war. In an nonviolent revolution, everyone- including women and children, would be participating, since they would not be physically harmed. If during a violent revolution where men would go to war, women would still be able to financially support their children, and the men would make sure that their families would not get …show more content…
Since there is no actual harm being done to the people or the government, both parties will not feel obligated to back out. All of the time being wasted on protesting, and nonviolently fighting would be expensive. The people would be giving up time they could use to work or do something productive to just protest, or boycott. Time is money, and although money can be made up, time can never be recovered if lost. From a social standpoint, there will not be a drastic change in society that will negatively affect the nation. Mankind's instincts are to survive in any means necessary, which will almost always involve war, and blood being shed. Although wars are horrible things that happen, we people have adjusted to not feel as bad when he hurt people, as long as we benefit. Our society will become slightly more corrupt, but much more manageable than if our revolution was nonviolent. Nonviolent revolutions are very hard on society. As humans, we tend to be greedy people, and only care about themselves. People tend to only care for themselves, and cannot help one another unless in a state of emergency. There is no emergency in a nonviolent revolution, because no people die. People do not put a lot of effort into nonviolent revolutions, as their instinct would make it feel like it is not important to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Violence was the main way that the Bolsheviks held onto power not just because of its effect but because they used it everywhere within their regime, so using the Cheka, grain requisition, and Red Army and Kronsdat sailors. One way they used violence was the Cheka, they were the secret police that Lenin had created to get rid of any political threats. It is estimated that between their creation and 1921 over 30,000 political "enemies/threats" were killed and many more were imprisoned or tortured. They would also track down the deserters and either force them to fight or kill them for running away from the war. The Cheka had a big effect on the opposition within the Bolshevik power they were terrified that if they said anything or tried to strike then they would be killed. So this helped them to keep power, as the people obeyed the rules even if they did not completely believe in them, so there seemed to be little unrest. Another way they use violence to keep power was the grain requisitioning. This was when they had War Communism in place, this caused the peasants to start hoarding the grain as they did not want to just give it away, and this meant here was not enough for the people in the towns and cities. So the Bolsheviks had to start sending in people to get the grain form the peasants. If any of the peasants tried to…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revolutions tend to have a negative connotation to them, seeming bloody and fighting against logic. However, revolutions can be a positive thing and they sometimes are such as the American Revolution, but revolutions only tend to be positive things when you have the correct person who is in charge to manage everything that happens. In Benito Cereno by Melville, Into the Wild by Krakauer, and The Heroic Slave by Douglass the characters become the people leaders of their respective rebellions. Although their success varies, Chris, Babo, and Madison all have the capability to rebel because the intelligence that they display throughout their active rebellions, which are isolated from society.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While you might might hear people rebelling against the government in the news, what you might not know is that this has been occurring worldwide for many years. There are many protests happening all across the globe, but with these protests comes intentions. The intentions of those rebelling against their government might be different from place to place, but the same ideas still remains. People worldwide rebel and protest mainly to incite change within what they believe to be a corrupt system.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Revolution can either fail or succeed , many revolutions succeeded due to overthrowing their presidents , and kings and over all important people in that current era . For Example , The people of Nicaragua suffered a huge impact of oppression that led to the development of domination against the Sandinistas and a Revolution that impacted not only Nicaraguan people but also Latin American people with political and social effects .…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful defiance of laws effectiveness is all in the eye of the beholder. If done correctly it can bring attention to the movement in a positive light. However if it causes to much of a nuisance to people that do not support the cause it will receive much opposition. The most effective peaceful defiance of laws in my opinion would be the Civil Rights movements of the 50s and 60s. With their leaders they perfectly blended the ability to get their word out with complying with others to achieve what they wanted. Now at the time their tactics must have been a nuisance, but that is why it worked so well. They implicated many plans that involved people of all age and even all race to make people see how badly they were beimg treated.That is unlike…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history their have been numerous revolts and rebellions against tyrannical kings and governments which were simply out of control. In other cases it has been a group of underprivileged, misunderstood, misrepresented, or oppressed groups of people. In this case these certain groups of people took it into their own hands to create the government they wished for. In most cases these groups of people had rational causes for their rebellions. However, the American Revolution was not an example of this. In fact it was quite the opposite. The American Revolution was not a group underprivileged, misunderstood, misrepresented, or oppressed people. These were a group of privileged, successful, and powerful people who lived in one of the most promising places of the world. The thing about them is that they wanted more power faster than it was being given to them. And because of this they orchestrated one of the most successful uses of…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A revolution was the only way for the government to change. That revolution should have been lead, by peasants and worker, to ensure all the needs of the people…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For decades people have asked are revolutions really worth all the trouble it cause sand there have been many arguments from both sides of it. On one side revolutions have brought about great new countries into the world that would have never existed if no one had spoken up. However on the other the situations that were dealt with during these revolts make a person question was it really worth all of that hardship. These revolutions can take a toll on the populations of countries with thousands of innocent citizens dying on both sides.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That is exactly how a revolution can go wrong. Moreover, the purpose of the revolution can get done, by hardwork and perseverance. The end result can happen but at what cost? Is killing and torturing people the way to go? Consequently, this has been happening around the world more and more. Such as, native americans fighting off modern day genocide on the border of north and south…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is impossible to define the methods used when resisting a government or institution. Lenin summaries the general feeling within a country at the brink of revolution when he says ‘A revolution occurs when those on top can do more, and when those below will stand for no more.’ This statement is applicable to many of the instances over the years although the techniques and outcomes that followed varied drastically. Due to the changes in society over the many decades containing revolutions the nature of resisting has adapted in order to cause the largest impact on the government. The admiration of the French Revolutions of the 19th century led to more recent ones to model their resistance on what they know of the past. Everyday resistance, which…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement: Civil Disobedience, though often taken as a refusal to obey governmental instruction, was in fact an appropriate gesture of the people during the People Power Revolution because the people demonstrated democratic action when they felt that they were being oppressed.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you hear the word revolution, many things may come to mind: vicious, bloody battles, mobs and militiamen, powerful and oppressive kings, and feudal japan. Or perhaps you think of specific revolutions such as the French Revolution or the American Revolution. But are these the only kind of revolution that has, or will ever exist? Simply put, no. So what else can a revolution be, besides an unruly uprising? Well, a revolution is a change in society, which can be violent or non-violent, led by a group of people with a common interest, and which has lasting effects on government, society, or economy. Given this standard we can look at revolution in a whole new light, opening the doors to some of history’s greatest…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many forms of oppression throughout history. While many forms of oppression have been eradicated, many forms still exist in today’s society. Concerning the forms of oppression that have been eradicated, the question that comes to mind is how these forms of oppression were dealt with and what led to them being eradicated. The process of dealing with oppression in turn brings to light another question in how successful are the resistors’ approaches in dealing with oppression. There are two main distinct approaches to oppression which are violent resistance and non-violent resistances. Since there have been many oppressed groups that have seen success from nonviolent resistances to oppression, the focus of this paper will be taking a stance in proving that the oppressed do see success in nonviolent approaches. In analyzing this notion, I will discuss the forms of oppression portrayed in the film Pride by Stephen Beresford and Angela Davis’s chapter “Class and Race in the Early Women’s Rights Campaign.” I will then discuss the resistors’ approaches in dealing with oppression and give my opinion of the most effective way to resist oppression which is a union of many forms of resistances coming together. Finally, I will discuss how much power really…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non Violent Resistance

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chenoweth and Stephan's arguments and research show that non violent campaigns are more successful than violent campaigns against violent political regimes. Though violent protests can show to be successful and they do get the point across though in a very different way, non violent protests I will have to agree, are the best and most efficient way to go about combating a violent opposition. With cases such as Dr. Martin Luther King, and Ghandi being two of the most noted cases. (not to say that there are not many more)…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays