Preview

The Causes And Effects Of The Reigns Of Charles And James II

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1305 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Causes And Effects Of The Reigns Of Charles And James II
The overall consequence of the of the reigns of Charles and James II was to led English closer to be Tory –at least for some time – and Anglican rather than Francophile and Catholic. England’s relationship with Roman Catholic religion had been tense and problematic since the reign of Henry VIII, and the reigns of Charles II and James II contributed greatly to that ever-increasing hostility. Both Charles II and James II had Catholic tendencies and the only difference between them was that Charles II was more cautious in showing openly his sympathies.
Charles II was willing to implement policies of toleration towards Catholics and nonconformists, yet he faced great opposition from Parliament. After a meeting between Presbyterians and Anglicans
…show more content…
This name came from the first letter of their names: Clifford, Arlington, the second Duke of Buckingham, Ashley, and Lauderdale. During this time the main issues in Europe were the falling power of Spain and the aggressiveness of Louis XIV of France. Charles signed the Treaty of Dover (1670) with France consenting to aid Louis with the war against the Dutch. He also declared that he would convert to Catholic religion when the time was right, and if his people did not accept it, France would help him. As a gift, Louis sent Charles £166,000. In 1672, Charles issued the Declaration of Indulgence in which he suspended the punishments against nonconformists and Catholics. However, when the war with Holland started, the Parliament only accepted to vote for money if Charles withdrew the declaration. The Commons were aware that Holland was a declining power and that it did not represent a threat to England’s interests, France was the major threat. The anti-Catholic and anti-French spirit was deeply rooted in the Commons. They regarded Roman Catholics and the emerging and aggressive power of France as a threat and feared them. In consequence, they passed the Test Act which banned any person who hadn’t taken the Anglican Sacrament and made an official declaration against transubstantiation from holding a public office, civil or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1559 Queen Elizabeth 1 of England passed two acts as part of the Church Settlement: The Act of Supremacy and The Act of Uniformity. With these acts she aimed to unite her countries people and avoid rebellion from each religious group. At first it seemed to have worked: The new Archbishop of Canterbury, Matthew Parker (a moderate protestant) was popular with most people; Only 250 out of 9000 priests refused to take the oath of loyalty to the new Church; the fines for recusancy were not strictly enforced and there were no serious protests or rebellions. By 1568 most people had accepted the new Church.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Chapter 4 Outline

    • 1878 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Charles II and James II issued decrees allowing Catholics to hold high office and woship openly. English tolerated James’ conversion to Catholicism because heirs (Mary and Anne) were Anglican.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons why Charles and Parliament failed to reach a settlement was due to religion, especially with the division between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The differences between the two were that Political Presbyterians favoured a negotiated peace with Charles and did not approve of the New Model Army, and were also drawn more closely to the Presbyterian Scots whereas the Political Independents were in favour of a more considerable measure of religious toleration and disliked the authoritarianism of Scottish Presbyterianism. This division throughout Parliament meant that they had failed to reach a settlement negotiating peace terms that was to be decided upon them. In July 1646, the Political Presbyterians had presented Charles with the Newcastle Propositions as their plan for settlement which consisted of severe terms such as Charles was to accept Presbyterianism for three years in England, Parliament was to have control of the militia for 20 years, and the Triennial Act was not to be abolished and to have regular parliaments. Charles rejected these terms of the Newcastle Propositions and instead offered counter-proposals suggesting that the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kings and Queens Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James II inherited the crown in 1685. He practiced being a catholic openly and hired Catholics into high offices and, he would suspend laws on a…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born in 1500, Charles I of Spain is the successor to the Habsburg dynasty ruled Austria and large parts of Europe during the Reformation as Emperor Charles V. On the side of his father, Philip of Burgundy, Maximilian Habsburg Austria Mary of Burgundy and. On the side of his mother, Joana "The Mad" of Castile, Ferdinand and Isabella's, who unified the crown of Aragon Spain and Castile. This made Charles the heir of many lands, which he started at the age of sixteen successor. Growing up in Burgundy in France, his first language is French and he was steeped in the foreign policy of political Burgundy. Adrian of Utrecht, who a short time would become pope in 1522 before he died a year later, as a member of his court. Between 1516 and the death of his father, Emperor in 1519, Charles inherited procedure duchies Austria, Carinthia, Moravia, Tyrol, and Styria; Netherlands along with France-Comte from…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first factor that led to Charles I losing the First Bishops War was the lack of funding. This was because Parliament had taken control of taxes before the civil war and enjoyed a substantial financial advantage, which also leads to the next factor of the lack of support and discipline from the Parliamentarian forces. Following the outbreak of the Scottish Revolution and Hampden’s case, the ship money yield fell dramatically from 90% collection to 20%. Charles tried to deal with the Scots, without recourse to Parliament. Facing financial problems and not wanting to recall Parliament, Charles negotiated the Truce of Berwick in 1639 agreeing to a meeting of a Scottish assembly as Edinburgh and Parliament as well as disbandment of both armies. On his return, Wentworth tried to advise Charles to call an English Parliament as the only means of raising money to fight the scots. However, Charles refused to compromise when he met with the Parliament and he dissolved it determined to face the Scots in the field. Alongside the attempt to collect the ship money, Charles had called for a coat and conduct money which was a tax to support the county-trained bands when they had to serve outside their country. It was supposed to provide for food and other expenses such as transport however there was widespread opposition to this.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Charles 1 A Crisis

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It could be argued that George purposely used his position on the Privy Council and his ‘good looks’ to gain his position to Charles’ predecessor, as a ‘secret Catholic’. This could account for his ill advice towards both kings. It is known fact that George’s mother was Catholic who selected his wife, Katherine, who was a ‘strict Roman Catholic’ herself. Therefore, it does arguably raise suspicion towards George’s true intentions of seeking the affection and attention of the kings. During this era, Protestantism strived; Catholicism was hated amongst the realm.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parliament frq

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell governed under a military dictatorship. He removed all Presbyterians from Parliament which created a Rump Parliament that voted to execute Charles and…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the period of 1547-1559 there were many fluctuations in the religion of the country. As during Edward VI reign (1547-1553) the religion changed to Protestantism which meant that many changes took place and they were very anti-catholic. Edward changed the succession which claimed that Mary I illegitimate and that Lady Jane Grey should be next in line to take the throne. However Edwards plan failed and Mary usurped the throne from Grey and made the country Catholic immediately. Marys reign was based on the reinstallment of Catholicism to England, the majority of the England accepted but there were still people who refused…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was under the Protectorate of Northumberland that the rate of reform rapidly increased as a result of Northumberland’s approach to religion which was much more open to change as opposed to the cautious and anxious approach that Somerset took. Under Somerset’s Protectorate England remained in a stagnant state of imbalance which satisfied neither Catholics nor Protestants. However, it could be argued that the First Prayer Book of 1949 launched the reform forward in favour of Protestantism as Conservative figures such as Gardiner had given their assent to the book and esssentially accepted that the country was moving towards Protestantism. Although the production of this prayer book was one of the main grievances of the Western rebels which implies that not everybody had so easily given in to the imminent approach of Protestantism and Catholicism was still favoured among the common people. It would seem that the elite and the less educated clergy were open to reform and had accepted it whereas the common people, to whom religion is central to their lives and popular culture, were less ready to accept radical reform.…

    • 573 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glorious Revolution Causes

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Though the belief of Roman Catholicism was infamous, the king James II attempted to redefine it. He tried to make it the state religion of the country. He was in favor of the Catholics so always tried to give more privileges to them. His ‘dispensing power’ of ruling was the indication of that. He had the authority to renew or repeal any parliamentary act. Therefore, he issued a proclamation was rejected by the parliament because that clearly visualized his tyrannical…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June 1642, Parliament released the Nineteen Propositions, this fully divided the King and his supporters from Parliament and their supporters. It was the final straw because the demands with the propositions were so extreme that it would render the King useless.These demands included all political decisions must be passed through Parliament, all ministers must be approved by Parliament, and Parliament is to control the army. The most arduous demand being that Parliament control the marriage and educations of the King's children, as this demand would allow for Parliament to indoctrinate the King's children and shape them into what they want. There was no way that Charles were to agree to these demands, and Parliament knew it as well, thusly bringing conflict closer. This also culminated when in March of 1642, Parliament took control of the English army without the King's permission. This escalated the conflict to a point of no return as now both sides were armed, and ready to fight. Parliament had the choice of diplomatic resolution and chose to fight. Parliament's milization and unreasonable demands were the final straw in the events that lead up to the war.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Reign of Edward Vi

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages

    often only existed to serve the interests of those who enacted them, and not the…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays