Preview

The Compromise Of 1850

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Compromise Of 1850
Compromise of 1850
The Compromise of 1850 was made in 1850, to help the problem of California being turned into a free or slave state. In order to please the North, it proposed California would be admitted as a free state and the slave trade would be abolished in Washington D.C. In order to please the South it proposed that Congress would not pass laws regarding slavery for the rest of the territories won from Mexico, and Congress would pass a stronger law to help slaveholders recapture runaway slaves. Senator Henry Clay helped create this compromise. Stephen A. Douglas succeeded in having this law passed. Some people were happy with this law, but instead of solving the problem it created even more tension between the North and South. It did
…show more content…

During the time of the election in March 1855 there were more supporters of slavery than opposers in the territory, but they did not want to risk losing the election so they got five thousand people from Missouri to vote in the election illegally. The Kansas legislature was full of proslavery representatives. Anti-Slavery boycotted and protested the government. They made a government of their own. In May 1855, a proslavery mob attacked the town of Lawrence, Kansas. They destroyed offices and the house of the governor of the antislavery government. The attack became known as the Sack of Lawrence. For revenge on what the supporters of slavery did in Lawrence, John Brown and seven other men went to the cabins of many proslavery neighbors and murdered five people. This attack is known as the Pottawatomie Massacre named after the creek the bodies were found. Civil war broke out in Kansas and lasted for three years thanks to this violence. The territory was later called “Bleeding Kansas.” This caused a lot of …show more content…

Douglas in 1858. The Republicans charged that the Democrats wanted to legalize slavery in all the states not just in U.S. territory. They used this to attack many democrats, especially the sponsor of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen A. Douglas. Illinois Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln to challenge Stephen A. Douglas for his U.S. Senate seat. In his first campaign speech, he communicated how the North was afraid that the South wanted to expand slavery to the whole nation. He said, “A House divided against itself cannot stand,” which is from the Bible, “-I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved-I do not expect the house to fall-but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all other.” Abraham Lincoln said this in Springfield, Illinois, June 16,1858. They both had many debates throughout the year. They talked about the expansion of slavery. Lincoln was against the expansion of slavery. He said slavery was “a moral, a social, and a political wrong” and said that African Americans had rights under the Declaration of Independance, but he never said slavery should be abolished. Douglas said that popular sovereignty was the best way to address slavery because it was the most democratic. The Supreme Court said popular sovereignty was unconstitutional because people can not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1856 a law was passed that Kansas and Nebraska were able to vote on whether or not or not to be a slave state. Kansas was the first to get all their votes in and it ultimately ended up being a slave state. John Brown and the anti-slavery advocates did not like the results of Kansas now being a slave state. In response to Kansas being a slave state they made a “Lawrence Kansas” which is ultimately a free-settlement in the territory of Kansas. Pro-slavery advocates did not like that they did this so they went to Lawrence Kansas and burnt the town to the ground. John Brown and his anti-slavery advocates despised that they did this to innocent people. So, he got revenge for the burning of the city by killing five pro-slavery supporters next…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Pottawatomie Massacre- reaction to the sacking of Lawrence (Kansas) by pro-slavery forces, John Brown and a band of abolitionist settlers (some of them members of the Pottawatomie Rifles) killed seven settlers north of of Pottawatomie Creek in Franklin County, Kansas. This was one of the many bloody episodes in Kansas preceding the American Civil War…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder. The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. What could posses a person to do such a heinous crime when they have almost everything going for them? Almost does not count in the presidential elections. This was especially true with the Compromise of 1850. Two large faces in America at the time, John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster, had opposing views on what would be the ideal decision for the better good. The Compromise of 1850 included five bills passed to keep power balanced between slave and non-slave states following America's investment in new territory after the Mexican-American War.1 During the 1850s there were influential speeches spoken by both Calhoun and Webster, could the difference and need of power have led to Calhoun's death?…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1850s DBQ

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tensions caused by the differing beliefs were slowly built up since the American Revolution. Slavery, being an established practice since America’s independence and a cause of the Civil War, was not an issue at the time, but was also left unresolved by the Founding Fathers. As time passed on, and as morals evolved, the views towards slavery changed as well. The original belief of slaves as nonhuman/property slowly progressed into slaves being lesser-humans. As beliefs changed, and the acceptance of slaves grew positively in the North, the basis of government became more and more unstable. With differing bases of thought, America’s ability to stay unified couldn’t happen with government trying to please both opposing sides, like found in the Compromise of 1850 (Doc 1). The Compromise attempted to alleviate the slavery situation that arose when California fulfilled the requirements to become an official state. The admittance of California threw off the Great Compromise and the Missouri Compromise. To counter that change, the Compromise made the New Mexico and Utah Territories free to become slave states via allowing them popular sovereignty. To add to the South-positive compromises, the Fugitive Slave Laws (Doc 3) were also employed, thus “balancing” the additions to both territories. The decision was technically correct for the event, as it settled the tension from the California, but in doing so, left the issue of slavery un-addressed and even strengthened slavery. The Compromise of 1850 only brought “compromise” in the regard of the free-slave states ratio, but greatly supported…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was made to settle issues between North and South about territory and slavery that was caused by the Mexican-American War. There were five bills made. The first bill was that California was a free state. The second state was that Texas would be paid compensation by the government for giving California and New Mexico up. The third bill was that New Mexico was a new state without any specific prohibition of slavery. The fourth bill was that there would be no slave trade in Washington DC. The fifth bill was that if a slave ran away, people would have to chase after it no matter what. Even though this was a compromise, the North and South didn’t really like it that much. Texas especially didn’t like it because they lost a lot of territory.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In May 1856, a pro-slavery mob attacked a free soil stronghold in Lawrence. They burned down public buildings and homes. There was also the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre, where abolitionist forces attacked a small pro-slavery settlement in Pott. Creek. 5 men were executed. After this, the war lasted another 4 months. The new governor, John Geary, managed to send Missourians home in 1856. Frail tranquility followed, but violent attacks continued for several more years.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln believed that the recent Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case was part of a Democratic conspiracy that would lead to the legalization of slavery in all states. Referring to the court's decision which permitted Dred Scott to live in a free state and yet remain a slave, he said, "what Dred's Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state”. Abraham Lincoln’s “house divided” speech was a response to the political situation in the United States in that he would achieve his goals of stopping the spread of slavery into other territories, by arguing that Douglas was acting to spread slavery across the nation. Douglas told Americans that Lincoln was completely irresponsible in saying that a house is divided, Douglas was forever against Lincoln ideas and speeches. Lincoln lost elections to Douglas but his eloquence in politics kept him the national limelight and opened way to his…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despised the compromise of 1850 Abolitionism grew in the North Northerners formed vigilante committees to protect runaways Ex-slave Fredrick Douglas published The North Star Underground railroad was a nature of safe houses to help slaves escape to freedom Grimke sisters revealed some southerners opposed…

    • 45 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was primarily about the future of slavery in the new territories and the Union. Out of the Compromise of 1850 came “The Fugitive Slave Law”, which gave owners of escaped slaves the power and the resources to procure their escaped slaves. It constituted one of its provisions was controversial federal laws that intended to pacify the slaveholding south and enraged the Northern abolitionist and ultimately provoked the Civil War.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fugitive Slave Act was one of the five acts contained in the Compromise of 1850. The highly controversial new law required the return of all runaway slaves to their masters. The recovery of runaway slaves was now under Federal Jurisdiction. Federal Marshalls were now bound by duty to return any runaway and also now had the authority to require assistance from any individual. If the assistance was not provided, the individual faced prosecution and fines. The law also stripped runaway slaves of such basic legal rights as the right to a jury trial and the right to testify in one's own defense. (Digital History, 2014)…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding kansas

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First thing first, what is the compromise of 1850? The compromise of1850 was a set of five bills that eventually lead to the civil war. Its purpose was to keep away confrontation between the northern free slave states and the southern slave states and keep the nation united. The first bill consist of California being admitted to the union as a free state. The second bill allowed New Mexico and Utah settlers to vote on an issue. The third bill relied on Texas loosing New Mexico territory, but $10 million was received from the government for the loss. The slave trade in the district of Colombia was abolished which created the fourth bill. Last but not least the fifth bill passed a new Fugitive slave act.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hostilities between armed bands seemed inborn in late 1855 as well over a thousand Missourians crossed the border and intimidated Lawrence, a free-state stronghold. On May 21, 1856, ruffians actually looted that town. In response, John Brown arranged the murder several days later of five proslavery settlers along Pottawatomie Creek. Four months of partisan violence and wasting arised. Small armies ranged over eastern Kansas, clashing at Black Jack, Franklin, Fort Saunders, Hickory Point, Slough Creek, and Osawatomie, where Brown and forty others were routed in late…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was a true compromise. Both sides of the debate were perfectly unhappy, or “halfway happy” as it has been phrased. Instead of being content that they got something they wanted, both ended up resenting the other more for what they got, and for not seeing it their way. The compromise did nothing to improve relations or communication between the two sides. It entrenched both, and shut down debate as everyone involved was increasingly defending and justifying their beliefs.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays