There are several facts which could prove this statement. First of all, it should be said that there were no serious reasons for the crash of the plain. It functioned well and the only problem was the lack of fuel which was also not crucial. However, the misunderstanding between dispatchers and pilots led to the disaster. That is why. it is possible to assume that existence of precise international terminology could have helped to avoid this tragedy. Having a certain list of actions which should be performed under certain conditions, pilots would be able to work more efficiently and inform people on the ground about their problems in time. However, it should also be said that dispatchers should also work ore efficiently and show more interest and involvement in every case. Being not able to understand the words of the pilots and interpret them, they made the plain remain in the air till the situation became disastrous and the pilots had to act under horrible …show more content…
As it has already been mentioned, there are two main versions of main reasons of the tragedy, which are the fault of the airline company and the fault of the dispatchers, that seems to be more preferable for us. Being not able to interpret the words of the pilots they doomed 73 people and caused an accident. The idea that the pilots were not able to explain clearly that they had the problems with fuel could not be taken as plausible as according to the records they demanded permission to land several times, stating the fact that they could not remain in the air anymore. That is why, the dispatchers should have understood the nature of the problem and guarantee goo landing for the