international perception of Barcelona abroad, and the city’s urban development. Overall, €6.7 billion were spent on the games, most of which was spent on improving infrastructure. Overall, the city reaped a profit of €7.2 million from the games themselves (Flyvbjerg 2012). The long-lasting economic effects and legacy, however, have been much more significant. For example, the Barcelona Organizing Committee invested €2 billion in constructing and improving four main sporting venues. Today, these venues welcome nearly 1,000,000 people each year for various conferences, concerts, and sporting events and they support nearly 450 permanent jobs (International 2013).
In terms of specific areas of economic development, immediately upon their nomination, unemployment underwent a dramatic fall, the housing market boomed, and the construction industry expanded at an exponential rate. The Barcelona Olympics were also unique economically, in that Barcelona was able to sustain this economic growth for decades to come. In fact, until the recent recession that affected most of Western Europe, the city recorded growth in every economic indicator: employment, investment, and new construction. Thus, not only did Barcelona benefit at the time from the games, “it succeeded in maintaining the growth generated, on a scale never seen before” (Cid 2002). In terms of employment, Barcelona’s unemployment rate was cut in half from 18.4% to 9.6%. Not only was employment provided during the preparation and the games themselves, but nearly 20,000 permanent jobs were created due to Olympic-related investment in infrastructure and facilities (Cid 2002). In terms of investment, one-third of the event was funded by the private sector and a third of this was with foreign capital. Private investment focused predominately on the construction of housing, hotels, and business centers. The rationale for this private investment was the expectation of improvement in the city’s level of attractiveness for conducting foreign business and attracting future foreign investment. Finally, in terms of new construction, the sector multiplied by nearly 3.5 times, despite the fact that Barcelona’s building potential was already quite exploited (Cid 2002). One final area of economic development was in tourism. Between 1986 and 2014, Barcelona’s hotel capacity increased threefold and the number of visitors from abroad increased by sevenfold, reaching 7.2 million visitors a year. In this regard, Barcelona’s legacy has been more “intense and sustained than that of any other modern host city” (Cid 2002). Therefore, the Barcelona Olympics have become an economic model for present-day Olympics – an exceptional performance by a city with an extraordinary and sustained capacity to ride the “Olympic wave” (Taylor 2012). The reasons for this dramatic increase in tourism are a direct result of the second broad area of change experienced by Barcelona as a result of the games. Throughout the games and opening and closing ceremonies, Barcelona put on a large promotional show, highlighting the culture of Barcelona almost more so than the rest of Spain as a whole. As a result, the games “changed the way people thought of Barcelona” (Taylor 2012). Between 1990 and 2001, the city went from being the 11th “Best City in Europe” to the 6th and is now rated the 12th most popular destination for tourists in the world, twenty years after the games. More than simply presenting the culture that already existed (Castellers, flamenco, etc.), Barcelona did a bit of lying and presented a somewhat contrived culture. For example, the games were heavily sponsored by Estrella Damm and Don Simon, producers of beer and sangria respectively. So, despite the fact that Barcelona is not known for its beer and that sangria is not actually popular for the locals here, the international community was presented a clear relationship between these two brands and the city. Nowadays, bars in the United States boast selections of “Spanish beer and sangria,” leading international tourists to equate these with the culture of Spain and Barcelona. Because so many tourists began to request these when they traveled to Barcelona, things have come full circle and many local bars now advertise their sangria and “typical Barcelonian beers.” As Adam Taylor of Business Insider explains, “Nowadays we think of the Spanish city as a land of palm trees, sand, and sangria but its easy to forget that before the games in 1992, it was a much different place” (Taylor 2012). In fact, none of the palm trees in Barcelona are native to the city – most of them were planted in the six years between the announcement of Barcelona as the host city and the actual games.
One final cultural development of note, the Olympics helped transform Spain into a “sporting juggernaut,” with world-class athletes in soccer, basketball, cycling, and tennis. Many assert this is a direct result of investment in sporting facilities and training before and after the Olympics (Barra 2012). As Spanish sportswriter Juan Jose Paradinas explains, “the Barcelona Olympics put the Spanish flair for sport and drama on international display” (Barra 2012). Nowadays, the names Real Madrid and FC Barcelona are synonymous with prestige and glory in a way that could not have been imagined before the games. This interest in sport has translated at an interpersonal level as well. According to the International Olympic Committee, the increase in the proportion of the population doing some kind of physical activity at least once a week increased from 36% in 1983 to 51% in 1995 and women’s participation in organized sports increased 10% nationwide during the same period (International 2013).
One final area of development for Barcelona before, during, and after the Olympics is in the urban renewal that took place. Most significantly, Barcelona today is characterized strongly by its beachfront. However, the city did not really have a beach before. Rather, the Barcelona Olympic Committee created two miles of beachfront and a modern marina by demolishing industrial buildings on the waterfront before the games (Taylor 2012). For the city, the Olympics represented a significant effort to restructure. A report conducted by the Universit Autònoma de Barcelona dice que “New roads represented an increase of 15% over those existing in 1986, new sewage systems, 17%, and new green areas and beaches, 78%” (Taylor 2012).
In addition to the redeveloped seafront and major highways, additional transportation infrastructure was put into place for the games and “more than 100 hectares of what had been industrial land was redeveloped to incorporate the Olympic Village (now residential housing and public facilities)” (International 2013). In this regard, Barcelona seems to have set the model for future Olympic games in terms of the quality and quantity of investment in new infrastructure. Overall, the Olympic Games were one of the major turning points in the history of the city of Barcelona. The economic development was unmatched by any of the past Olympic Games or any other time in Barcelona’s history. Additionally, the games helped convey (and at times, create) the culture of Barcelona and Spain to the world stage. And, finally, the games began a period of urban renewal that helped revitalize the city – bringing it into the modern era as one of the world’s top tourist locations. The legacy of the 1992 Barcelona Olympic Games can be felt nearly everywhere in the city – one needs only to look up at the transplanted palm trees that line the streets, walk along the coast’s manmade beaches, or enjoy a glass of sangria amongst the millions of tourists that visit the city each year, to be able to recognize the lasting impacts of this enormous developmental catalyst.
Bibliography:
Barra, Allen.
"From Soccer to Tennis to Cycling, Spain Is Suddenly Dominating Sports." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 22 June 2012. Web. 01 Apr. 2014. < http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/from-soccer-to-tennis-to-cycling-spain-is-suddenly-dominating-sports/258837>
Brunet I Cid, Ferran. "The Economic Impact of the Barcelona Olympic Games, 1986-2004." Barcelona: L’herència Dels Jocs. 1992-2002. (2005): 1-27. Web. <http://olympicstudies.uab.es/pdf/wp084_eng.pdf>.
Flyvbjerg, Bent; Allison Stewart (2012). "Olympic Proportions: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Olympics 1960-2012". Working Paper. Saïd Business School, University of Oxford.
International Olympic Committee. "LEGACIES OF THE GAMES UPDATE." International Olympic Committee (2013). Web. 1 Apr. 2014. <http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Reference_documents_Factsheets/Legacy.pdf>.
Taylor, Adam. "How The Olympic Games Changed Barcelona Forever." Business Insider. Business Insider, Inc, 26 July 2012. Web. 01 Apr. 2014. <
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-the-olympic-games-changed-barcelona-forever-2012-7>