Preview

The Economic Impact of the US/Iraq and Afghanistan

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Economic Impact of the US/Iraq and Afghanistan
The Economic Impact of the
US/Iraq and Afghanistan

ECO2013
August 18, 2014

Introduction In the past decade, the US has engaged in a number of wars with countries in the Middle East with regard to increased terrorism threat in the world. Presently, the US troops are engaged in armed conflict with the Taliban groups in Afghanistan and Iraq, and is contemplating engaging its troops in Syria to combat the Syrian government in the Syrian civil crisis. This move, however, has been met by widespread opposition from the public and legislators who have grown weary of the country’s planned invasion of Syria. Much of the outcry is directed at the government’s decision because of the impact that such a move will have of the US economy, analyzing from the previous impact that the country’s involvement in Iraq has had on the economy. This paper shall evaluate the decision by the political class in the US to engage in armed conflict with terrorist groups in the ways that it has affected and it will continue to the country’s economy.
The Economic Impact of the US/Iraq and Afghanistan War
The decision by the US to invade the countries of Iraq and Afghanistan was a political decision that was arrived at by the political class, headed by the country’s then president Bush and the senate. Economic analyses in the country on its expenditure in the two countries and in other operations that are tied to the country’s fight against terrorism indicate that it amounts to a modest amount of money each year. Military spending in these operations is estimated to be 6.2% of the country’s total GDP. Economists also point to the indirect and collateral effects of the wars on the economy, most of which are not captured in these calculations. These include increased international debt as a result of sustained war costs and the increased volatility in the oil prices all over the world as a result of the instability experienced in the two countries of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Moffatt M., (2008). Are wars good for the economy? . About.com. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://economics.about.com/od/warandtheeconomy/a/warsandeconomy_3…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 Summary

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 (better known as 9/11) by Osama Bin Laden rammed a wedge into the relationship between the United States and the Islamic world. In result the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and the invaded Iraq. Professor Irogbe’s article on the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq argues that the U.S. actions are igniting rather than reducing global terrorism and if U.S. were to withdraw troops from these countries it would promise for global peace and security. The article covers the cost of human and financial resources of the war, abuses committed by invaders including the application of extraordinary rendition, the indefinite detention of prisoners…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war in Afghanistan started after the September 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States while President Bush was in office. President Obama was inaugurated as president on January 20th, 2009 and he picked up in the middle of a long war in Iraq and Afghanistan. After taking office, General Stanley McChrystal was selected to command NATO operations in Afghanistan. McChrystal submits a detailed report, to then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, calling for a surge of 30,000 – 40,000 troops in Afghanistan. The general’s assessment reflects the “Polis Model” in that he writes “success demands a comprehensive counterinsurgency (COIN) campaign” and further writes “failure to gain the initiative”, “risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible”. This assessment gives the portrayal that increasing the troop count in Afghanistan is the only feasible option and that any other method would result in failure. To make matters worse, McChrystal’s 66 page assessment…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The estimated cost of war and how much it cost the U.S from 2001-2013…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For so long as America has existed as a country, there has been the ever-present idea of a warfare paradox when it comes to our involvement in conflicts. The clash between our ideals as a nation and what we do to further those ideals throughout the world will always be, to some extent, conflicting. Our Founding Fathers laid down the tenets of our land centuries ago, and through our course of trying to uphold those tenets, we have undoubtedly had complications I regards to conflicting ideals. The three mainstays of the warfare paradox, isolationism, interventionism, and protectionism, all have their roots in the foundations of the United States. This reality can be seen in some of the documents that decorate the annals of our collective history;…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DeConde, A., Burns, R. D., Logevall, F., & Ketz, L. B. (Eds.). (2002). Encyclopedia of American foreign policy (2nd ed.) (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Scribner 's.O’Malley, M. (1999)…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Foreign Policy

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is common today that the United States foreign policy has been inspiring to a lot of nations worldwide. It is argued by a lot of political scholars that the 9/11 terrorist attack actually shaped the United States foreign policy. Even though it is debatable to if the 9/11 attack did shape the United States foreign policy and how it did that can be discovered at the end of this essay. This will be proven by analysing a theoretical view of terrorism and a little background of what happened in September 11, 2001 and the United States foreign policy before the 9/11 attack followed by policies like the Bush doctrine, Obama doctrine and also looking at their criticisms.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Global Economy is the economy of the world considered as the international exchange of goods. It is also what holds the world's economy together and can decrease over time. Sometimes it can go wrong and cause catastrophic proportions. There is no apical market to help evaluate certain goods or services.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ferguson paper

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since George H.W. Bush (41) took office in 1989, the United States has intervened in several high-risk situations such as the Gulf War, military deployment in Iraq, and the ongoing War in Afghanistan resulting in thousands of deaths of American soldiers. This is not okay because these soldiers are sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters, of fellow American citizens. Although the President can involve the United States’ military in any situation with the permission of Congress, he should not so if the opposition is a threat. The United States should not be the world’s policeman because foreign affairs require a substantial amount of resources that the U.S. should not let go; more so the United States should focus resources to being a global caregiver.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been movements that support or oppose war throughout all of history. The 20th century saw this movement coalesce into a much larger and more diverse series of society changing events. Spanish-American war, World War I, World War II, the Cold War, Korea, Vietnam and Desert Storm were all wars that helped American society evolve into what it is today. For each of the conflicts, there were opposing points of view as to the amount of involvement or to even become involved at all. The pro-war or more conservative point of view lists strength and strong support for our allies as a primary focal point. The anti-war or liberal point of view is more of an isolationist or pacifist opinion that believes that diplomacy and understanding will resolve issues. This paper will discuss the opposing points of view leading up to each of the primary conflicts of the 20th century.…

    • 3507 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Policeman of the World

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since gaining independence from the British in 1776, the United States foreign policy over the years has gone from expansionist to isolationism to defending democracy. With the responsibility of defending democratic rights for those who cannot defend themselves, the United States in my opinion has taken on the role of “policeman of the world.” This role became more evident with the use of U.S. military force in international incidents like U.S. intervention in the 2011 Libyan Civil War to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, and U.S. involvement in the 2011 Yemeni Civil War protesting the leadership of Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh. Despite the United States being hailed as a defender of democracy by some, their actions are usually not selfless. In both situations protecting United States interests was a major factor. Both Libya and Yemen are hot beds for terrorist activity by radical groups like al-Qaeda. The United States keeps tabs on the activities of these groups in an effort to intercept information to thwart acts of terrorism, particularly against Americans. Leadership in these vulnerable countries is of great interest to the United States because some regimes are sympathetic to these militant groups. A lack of clear leadership in these countries also poses a threat to U.S. interests because a lapse in leadership can lead to militant groups seizing control.…

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American government wanted to expand power due to the War on Terror conflicts, by expanding their power in Iraq and Afghanistan it would be less likely for them to attack. The Americans did this by setting up multiple military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan which can equate with the Americans moving into Mexican territory before the Mexican War. This was done to establish a military presence to represent the advancement if imperialism. Military spending had increased by 15% at this time due to the inkling that American imperialism demanded for military, economic and diplomatic influence on alternative countries. There was contradictions on the US governments machination, specifically the point in which they are sending in military forces into an area of speculation. The threat was skeptical, there was doubt that Iraq and Afghanistan had been a hazard, but the US took this as an opportunity to stop them in their tracks even though they were going off of speculations. Instability on the War on Terror topic only intensified the powerful oppositions in both countries making both Iraq and Afghanistan the center of imperialism. The American government wanted to gain control over Iraq and Afghanistan to assert dominance in the economic and political aspects, as well as to gain the resources in the middle east. The major resource in Iraq and Afghanistan was oil, the US owned 70% of the worlds known and declining oil reserves and they sought to have ascendency over more. As we can see, this proved another point of imperialism. The American government created an excuse to move into Iraq and Afghanistan with force, so they could create dominance in the middle east, which greatly connects to the Mexican War, in which America had subliminal motive which was to gain land and its resources as well as create a sense of…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflicts that occurred in Afghanistan were the product of issues that stemmed decades back. The costs that were needed in order to continue fighting had many negative effects on Canada. As the military enlisted a vast number of soldiers, many lives were negatively affected by the war in various ways- which included death for numerous Canadians. Also, financial strain and time commitment needed had tremendous costs to Canada. Then, the goals that were set out and the outcomes that were met had significant costs.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are also significant macroeconomic costs to the War on Terror. The war has had macroeconomic costs to the economy due to investing money in the war instead of into the United States economy, and this hinders the progress and stability of the economy and causes economic setbacks. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have contributed in economic setbacks to the U.S. Economy. It can be argued that wars are good for the economy because they create jobs, but if the money spent on the war was invested in the public, then it would have created more jobs than those military jobs created by the wars. If the United States spends more money on industries that are more labor intensive than the military, they create more jobs, such as clean energy.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays