Contact Information: Daisy T. Emanuel 3rd Grade Teacher Sadie Tillis
1
Contents Chapter 1: An Overview…………………………………………………….3 Chapter 2: Introduction……………………………………………………...4 Chapter 3: Literature Review ...……………………………………………..5 Chapter 4: Description of Research Method………………………………...9 Chapter 5: Results…………………………………………………………...8 Chapter 6: Discussion………………………………………………………14 Chapter 7: Conclusion……………………………………………………...15 References………………………………………………………………….16
2
Chapter 1... Overview ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of computer-based mathematics curriculum on problem solving and the students’ attitudes toward computer-based mathematics. Participants will be my 3rd grade students who will receive 2 hours weekly computer-guided math instruction along with their regular Math Investigations. The computer program that will be used in this study is Edutest. Edutest is a computer program that focuses on problem solving strategies, geometry, number sense, logic patterns, measurement, probability, and word problems that are in line with the district standards. The students will work independently on the computer with computer-guided instruction. During the study, students will take a pre test and posttest as well as on-going daily instruction in mathematics along with teacher made assessment tests in mathematics to measure their achievement levels. I will also take an attitude survey to gauge their feeling about using computer mathematics. A survey was given pre study and post study. This information was used to assist me in planning and implementing computer-based curriculum and to see whether their attitudes towards computer math will have an effect on how well they implement the program. I chose to study math because I enjoy teaching mathematics. Mathematics is the only subject that I have found in my career as a teacher that many students fear and feel
References: Karreich, E. (2004). Math lab: computer experiments are transforming Mathematics. ProQuest Education Journals. 165, 266-268 Leigh, C. (2003/2004). It’s all in the game. ProQuest Education Journals. 80(2), 59-64 Lederman, N., Niess, M. (1999). Is it live or is it Memorex? ProQuest Education Journals. 99(7), 357-359. Cyr, S. (2004). Can distance learning meet the needs of gifted elementary Students? ProQuest Education Journals. 27(2), 42-51. Crawford, D. (2000). Effective mathematics instruction the importance of Curriculum. ProQuest Education Journals. 27(2), 122-142. Roschelle, J.m., Pea, R.D., Hoadley, C.N., Gordin, D.N., Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with Computer-based technologies. Future Child. 10(2), 76-101. Hubbard, L. (2000). Technology-based math curriculums: custom built for Today’s classroom. T.H.E. Journal. (28)3, 80-84. Inkrott, C. (2001). Beyond drill and practice: Managed courseware and electronic portfolios. MultiMedia Schools. (8)2, 44-47 Macnab, D., Fitzsimmons, G. (1999). Enhancing math learning through Computer- assisted instruction. Education Canada.(39)1, 38-39. Staples, A., Pugach, M.C., Himes, Dj. (2005) Rethinking the technology Integration challenge: case from three urban elementary schools. Journal of Research on technology in Education. ( 37)3, 281-307. 16 17