Preview

The Emergence Of The French Revolution In Military Warfare

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Emergence Of The French Revolution In Military Warfare
The advent of the French revolution brought about significant change to the European landscape towards the latter part of the 18th century. Of the several changes to occur as a result, it was the revolution in military warfare that was most significant. Napoleon Bonaparte, the French military and political leader who rose to prominence during this timeframe, can be credited with influencing many aspects of this warfare revolution. This evolutionary period in warfare was significant because it transformed the ideology of nationalism for many people as well as the ways in which armies were raised, organized and employed on the battlefield. Several of these changes can still be seen in the doctrine and tactics of today’s modern armies. Napoleon …show more content…
After King Louis XVI’s execution, the newly formed French national assembly fundamentally changed the way in which armies were raised. The government believed that the army was an instrument of the “public’s purpose and the people’s aspiration” and as such, converted the army into a public institution where all citizens were eligible for all ranks and service. This new system which initially relied upon volunteers to serve but was later expanded into a universal conscription, or levee en masse, required participation from all French citizens, men, women, and children alike. Unlike previous armies where troops proved ineffective, reluctant, and even, rebellious in times of conflict, the new army inherited by Napoleon showed to be loyal and motivated by a sense of nationalism or esprit de corps not previously witnessed in warfare. Many of these revolutionary changes previously discussed can be witnessed in the way modern nations raise and employ their own militaries. Similar to the levee en masse, many nations today, to include the U.S., raise armies based upon a similar concept of compulsory …show more content…
By the summer of 1794, the ranks of the French army had grown to over one million soldiers thereby creating challenges in maintaining command and control of such a vast force. Understanding the need for a better system of organizing and employing the force, Napoleon implemented a series of changes that would fundamentally alter the way in which armies were deployed on the battlefield and eventually become the model for today’s strategic organization. Although the concepts of organizing armies into corps level was developed prior to the revolution, Napoleon was able to make the corps system work much more effectively than it previously had through a system that depended on decentralized maneuver and centralized control. Organizational effectiveness of the French army was increased by combining infantry, cavalry and artillery to create combat divisions that could operate either independently or in conjunction with other combat divisions. This allowed Napoleon greater flexibility, balance as well as greater operational choices when it came to employing his army during battle. Napoleon could now mobilize a corps of 30,000 troops working autonomously at several different levels and effectively control “seven corps on the battlefield more easily than Frederick the Great could control one.”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    different generals at the head of their armies. These generals ranged from very skilled, highly…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The transition of governments and policies as instruments of subordination from royal monarchies to democracies and how they governed their citizens and military shed light on the changes to the character of warfare. As a royal-blooded King of Prussia, Frederick the Great harnessed the power of the state to influence the military. His officer corps naturally followed as part of a caste system devoted to their king. Citizens recruited into the military were compelled to follow both through strictly implemented disciplinary actions on the battlefield and through pay via government taxation. Additionally, Frederick insured popularity with the public and his soldiers by…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 American History

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This document was written between the years of 1796 to 1809, during which Napoleon Bonaparte was the military commander gaining popularity. The document starts in 1796 when Napoleon was a commander of the army, he began explaining with the conditions that they were fighting in and talks about wanting a change, and the document ends in the year 1809, with Napoleon explaining his strategies to make his army look larger than what it was (SWT, 117&119).…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, the raising of armies depended on local efforts. Uniforms were left mainly to local opinion, and officers ranked as high as colonels were democratically elected! In the South, cavalrymen provided their own horses.…

    • 4829 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book captures three main ideas as we look into our nation's military. The first is how industrialization and new technology constantly changed the way we fought. The early musket caused us to be slow on the draw and with improves of firearms, fighting became faster paced. Cannons made long range fighting more prevalent and began the early stages of field artillery. The invention of the automobile caused mobilization to become easier and more accessible. Wars were shorter due to less travel time. Tanks became a strong force on the battlefield. Eventually airplanes threw in a more strategic element to fighting. As they were developed, air strikes and air assaults were a capable force. This led to more thorough planning and threw in more opportunities to win battles. Second, is how breakdowns in leadership caused losses on the battlefield and unnecessary wars being fought. The most famous example is General Custer at Little Bighorn where he led approximately 210 men against a fierce 2,000 man Indian force. Despite warnings and obvious strategic setbacks, he fool-heartedly marched his entire element to their deaths. One less well known is General George McClellan. Maslowski writes that McClellan was reluctant to fight battles. He is quoted saying, "More Likely McClellan feared taking risks and was paralyzed by the prospect of carnage." He lacked the communication skills and the logistical techniques. Maslowski continues to say, "Only trial and error, under circumstances where error could be fatal, produced the necessary adjustments." Considering how warfare changed rapidly throughout the years, this type of adjusting was not uncommon. The last idea is the correlation between war and national policy. Almost every major new policy put in place cause some sort of military backlash, the first being the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Soon thereafter we had army's from Europe knocking at our door to try and maintain their control of the colonies.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technological advancements could play a role in this area to explain the change in the trajectory, but the author’s rejection of technological answers does not allow him to do this. Also, Lynn concentrates on institutional factors (recruitment, social composition, and motivation, command administration) to describe his model for evolution yet at various occasions he emphasizes political-economic, military competitiveness, and minimally technological advancements as his explanatory factors for change. Lynn does not clearly give explanation to what brought on the change in different army styles. In one army style military unreliability, increased political centralization, and increased economic monetarization are emphasized and in other centuries technological improvements or political costs are seen as the most influential. In this way Lynn’s explanatory factors are not internally consistent from century to century. For example, if technology had an impact in one time period than Lynn does not give valid reasoning for why it was not considered important in another…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jomini when describing the principles of war he makes the argument that “To throw by strategic movement the mass of an army, successively, upon the decisive point of a theater of war…” (Jomini, pg70). Clausewitz makes it clear that war is serious and therefore a country cannot limit their war effort saying, “He who uses his forces ruthlessly, shrinking from no amount of bloodshed must gain an advantage if his adversary does not do the same,” (Clausewitz pg 265). Both of these men learned many of ideas of military success came from the Napoleonic wars. The French under Napoleon’s regime shows the way in which a population that practices total war principles, an army in mass and ruthless no prisoners policy, would be able to defeat any army that does not also practice this same mentality. Napoleon incorporated both the ideas of strategic movement with those of principles of ruthless military campaign.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advancements in weaponry surpassed ancient tactics dating back to the Revolutionary War and inflicted staggering casualties. Railways allowed supplies and reinforcements to transcend conventional means, battles became fast paced requiring even more men to fuel the engine of war. These weapons and technologies bred the…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Towards the end of the eighteenth century the nature of warfare would dramatically change on both upon the battlefield but more importantly how it affected society. Continental Europe was engulfed in war from 1792 following the establishment of the French Republic and continued with the rise of Napoleon until his eventual defeat in 1815. Between 1792 and 1809 the French army seemed to grow from strength to strength turning from a “métier of the aristocrat” small, professional army to the first mass citizen army of the modern world. The success of the Napoleonic era French military in the first five coalition wars cannot be credited to one cause alone. Instead the Revolutionary/Napoleons’ Army (Grande Armée from 1805) had several contributing factors to its major successes.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Mongols Barbarians

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Especially on the battlefield is where the Mongols’ strategic thinking and organized formations got to shine. As for formation,”Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten; over ten of these should…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the Minutemen of the Revolutionary War to today's high-tech weapons, the American Military has changed and morphed to meet the needs of the times. Our military has evolved massively since the days of our Forefathers and is still growing every day. There are three key events where the American Military was improved and/or evolved setting a path for a more organized, trained, well-equipped, and respected Military. The events that will be discussed regarding the American Military was the Civil War, Mahan’s lectures, and the development of American Air Force. All of which greatly impacted the efficiency and success of the military and gave the United States great foundation for developing and advancing.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    La Quete Monologue

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The shift in power from the king of France to British generals such as Murray, Burton, and Gage…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But it was not the soldiers that made this Army so formidable, it was the artillery. French invasion of Italy in 1494 – modern age of warfare – change the nature of the state itself by provided powerful impetus for the rise of modern governments RMA – revolutions in military affairs History of warfare profoundly altered by forces, such as the rise of nationalism and democracy, little to do with new tools – but the tools of war DO matter Technology creates the potential for a military revolution; the extent to which militaries, societies, states, governments, etc exploit the new tools of warfare to create a military revolution depend on organization, strategy, tactics, leadership, training, morale, and other human factors; demands a paradigm shift from one set of assumptions to another Gunpowder revolution saw the rise of Western militaries over non-Western militaries who Since the rise of modern nation-states in the 16th and 17th centuries, shifts in military power have been closely associated with shifts in governance…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author also mentioned that western military practice had always exalted discipline as the primary instrument that unified individuals into fighting as an organized unit rather than kinship, religion, or patriotism. In spite of that, Napoleon would not have been as successful in his battles during the Napoleonic Wars without a devoted army who were willing to sacrifice themselves for their country. The French Revolution and the rise of the Prussian army would not be possible without enthusiasm and patriotism of its’ soldiers. These exceptions to the Western Way of War certainly raised…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crimean War

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Crimean war marked a transition in the way war was fought. It is arguably the beginning of modern warfare. The Napoleonic era had preceded the Crimean war. Napoleon changed the meaning and tactics of warfare, of pre 1792. Men did not take up arms for a King, but for a nation, to defend ones nation from the horrors of being occupied, this can be seen in the French revolution. Napoleon created the concept of a large-scale war, with his ‘Grande Armee,’ to defeat the enemy, a concept adopted by the king’s armies of Europe at the end of this period. However, the armies fighting in the Crimea did not adopt this. This therefore demonstrates a fundamental change in the nature of warfare. No longer did we see the use of large armies, but small professional armies, such as the British expeditionary force. Armies were no longer large rabbles of largely untrained conscripted men, rather professional well-trained men.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays