Preview

The First Step Of Clarke's Argument Of God

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The First Step Of Clarke's Argument Of God
(1.a.) Clarke’s first argument is God’s existence as a sufficient infinite reality in Person and Being. The first step of Clarke’s argument is “given any conditioned being, there must exist at least one absolutely unconditioned, or self-sufficient being (Clarke 215).” Every living thing is conditioned, in that it requires a cause. We are all radically conditioned to exist and we depend on other things to keep us that way. Humans for example exist do to their parents and they keeping existing because of the oxygen they breathe and the nutrients they eat. If we trace back the source of every living being, we must find a beginning, an initial source. We cannot trace back the sources forever. The second step of Clarke’s argument is “no being can …show more content…
There is a general understanding of God as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent but theologies have difficulties allowing these three to work together. Classical Theory emphasized God as all-powerful and removed the idea of human free choice. By claiming God as omnipotent, Classical Theory moves away from the idea that God is good. If God is the source of everything, that includes the bad actions and events as well. We lose the idea of God as omnibenevolent. Process Theology disregards the idea of God as omnipotent and views God as changing, in process. This undermines the divine perfection and removes God as the source of all. In Process Theology God is eros, meaning willing my good or fulfillment. This is in opposition to the more popular belief that God is agape, meaning self-giving love. If God is eros, God creates for God’s own fulfillment. God becomes God by creation, so he’s creating for himself and not for us. John Wright argues both of these are wrong because neither of them fit the God that is in the scriptures. There is a dialogical pattern, God has absolute initiative, creation and salvation. God doesn’t depend on the universe, God creates something out of nothing. There is human response, we are called to live more fully, to know and to love. God responds to this with without judgment, he gives our …show more content…
God knowing, God choosing and then God’s power bringing everything into being. God’s choice does not exhaust everything God knows. During creation, God’s divine will choses amongst what the divine intellect knows. Creatures and the created universe will specify what the divine will choses because they have their own integrity. The universe is a vast network of infinite relationships and God is truly regarding an evolving universe. God knows all the possibilities and knows they will plays out based on our interactions. This types in with evolution because God give being and existence. God allows creatures to act according to their nature. The creatures enter into a structure of God’ causative knowledge. After God creates, he choses what do give being to, specified by the universe. God creates the universe and it starts to play out in an intelligent, reasonable way. This is just like Clarkes argument for an intelligent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This view basically claims that God began the process of evolution within the context of created matter. Though God programmed the system, simple life forms were allowed to evolve into more complex life structures. During this entire process, God withdrew Himself from His creation, and allowed the ordained natural laws to guide the creative process. In this view, God is Creator of everything.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The traditional conception of God’s omnipotence is that God can do absolutely everything, including the logically impossible. Holding this view, God has the capability to do things that are logically contradictory, such as make square circles and make boxes he can’t lift and then lift them, and perform human actions such as swimming and committing suicide. This position is notoriously held by Descartes with his saying that we cannot lay down any limitations on God’s absolute power. He argues that God is above the laws of logic, as he is the creator of them and the lawmaker does not have to follow is own rules. If God had to conform to these laws then his omnipotence would be limited, which in itself is contradictory. God could have created different laws of logic if he wanted to, perhaps in another universe. If we consider a scenario where God had not created the laws of logic we consider to be absolutes, then we would have no qualm with God creating square circles (in theory, we could do so too). This remains even when God has created these laws because he is above them. However, this, for obvious reasons, opens up a Pandora’s box of logical problems and incoherencies. Things that are cannot also not be. Clearly, a circle cannot be square and to talk of such a thing is meaningless. If a shape were a square it would not be circular and if it were a circle it would not be square. Furthermore if God were to create such a thing, it would not be what we mean by a square circle but something in a private…

    • 2007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keller rebukes this by quoting Francis Collins in his book The Language of God, saying “the very fact that the universe had a beginning implies that someone was able to begin it.” (133). This statement captures perfectly one of the fatal flaws in the Big Bang theory; something outside of nature had to create nature itself. How more perfectly can one describe the person of God?! God not only fits this description, but it parallels John 1:3 when John says that “all things were made through Him, and without him was not anything made that was made” (ESV).…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who is responsible for creating all of mankind and all that surrounds it? God is responsible for the creation of the universe and the existence of that personal God is proven by a plethora of scientific evidence and logically probable reasons. Ironically, some of the opposing arguments originating from the atheistic worldview contribute to the constructing of theistic truths. While using the multiple competing hypotheses method of finding the most probable cause to the universe and the existence of all mankind, a personal creator fits better than the probability of creation just happening by chance. This universe is very complex and the existence of the personal creator can be explained in two arguments out of the many existing arguments…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    THEO 201 Final Essay

    • 801 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Genesis 1:1 we see the verse that tells us, “God created the Heavens and the Earth.” This shows the believers that God is the creator of all things. God is proud of everything that He has created and wants these creations to be a follower of Him and to multiply the Earth. Psalms 104:31 are one of my favorite verses, “May the Lord rejoice in His works” because I like to remind myself that He takes in pride in what He creates, and He created me and every one else with so much love. This verse is a good reminder of how God rejoices in all His creation. In Ephesians 2:10 we see that man was created in the image of God for a purpose, “for good works, which God prepared ahead of time, so that we should walk in them.” God has always been involved in His creations and in our lives.…

    • 801 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One is that while human creations and parts of nature are very similar they are also very different. Human creations are just as complex as nature. Nature, however, is far superior because it is self-perpetuating. The woodpecker’s tongue is incredibly complex and the woodpecker’s offspring will have the same complex tongue and on and on. These parts of nature can go on and on without the designers help while human creations require constant upkeep and guidance. Watches will sooner or later lose time or gears will rust or break and require a designer’s repair. This is one of the key differences that separate God’s designs from that of human’s. Another difference is that everything that humans create serves one or two distinct purposes. Human artifacts are created with those distinct purposes in mind though when we look at our solar system or Earth and at humans and animals there are an infinite number of possible purposes. The final question of this objection is: does it matter if God is finite and imperfect? This designer obviously has much more power and intelligence than that of humans and being finite and imperfect should not hinder its ability to create. If God is infinite and imperfect, why would he use his infinite and perfect power to create such flawed beings as humans? The objection dealing with the conclusion of multiple Gods asks the same question as the first objection. What is changed by the conclusion of multiple Gods? Robert Hambourger talks about this in his article titled “Can Design Arguments Be Defended Today”. In it, he talks about the great achievement that it would be to prove that the natural phenomena were created by intentional action, even if it could not be proved to have been done by a single entity (286). Ultimately, it should not matter what created our known universe as much as if our universe was created. Therefore, the objections to design arguments…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    73 Evans, Manis). However the argument itself if just a mere introduction into what “God” is or rather who “God” might be. Evans and Manis hint to this in their final paragraph. McCloskey’s version of the argument is misguided in the notion that each individual argument is to be pulled apart singularly or that they cannot relate to form an over arching theme that “Gods” existence is dependent upon many facets. One may look to the “The Absurdity of Life Without God” article when defending this frame of view. That without “God” and the necessity of existence humanity is just a happy accident that is riddled with a meaningless purpose. Though personally the purpose of life and the existence of “God” are not relatable other than the fact they are ideas and existential questions asked only to attempt to “prove” the cause of unexplainable events or…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cosmological argument for the existence of God. .... The first thing to note about the cosmological argument is that it is A Posteriori. ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Teleological Argument

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “With such signs of forethought in the design of living creature, can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?” (Socrates) The Design argument looks at the order and purpose, or telos, in the world and states that it implies that there must be a designer who made the world ‘just right’ for human existence. Religious believers go on to state that this designer is God. The argument states that if one uses one’s senses to look at order, such as gravity and the motion of the planets, which exists in the world, it is likely that one will accept that there is a designer God who created the world and gave it this order. Thus, the argument is both a posteriori, based on experience, and inductive, containing a conclusion that we are likely to accept if we believe the premises to be true. Although the argument was one of Aquinas’ five ‘ways’ in his book, Summa Theologica, the most famous version of the Argument from Design was put forward by William Paley in his book Natural Theology (1802), and therefore, this essay will focus mainly on Paley’s version of the argument.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anthropic principle proposes that the reason and purpose for the universe is the support of human life: ‘As we look out into the Universe and identify the many accidents…the Universe must in some case have know we were coming’ (Freeman Dyson, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle). It also demonstrates that the design argument need not reject the principles of evolution in order to assume a designing God. However, theistic supporters of evolution argue that scientific principles alone are not enough to explain a perfectly balanced natural order that…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological argument: An argument that says that a supreme being must exist because the chain of causes must have a…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rowe suggests that premise 2 “seems to be a necessary truth.” But it certainly is not if we take Clarke’s analysis of premise 1. If a living thing exists and it is not the case that something has always existed, then it does conclude that something has been produced out of nothing.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is eternal. God does not change. God will always be God. He does not evolve.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biblical Worldview

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One may wonder if God still has a hand on His creation today and if so, how? Take biology, without plants giving off oxygen we wouldn’t be able to breathe. How does the tree know how to produce oxygen? How do we know how to naturally breathe in and out? Look at Business. How does one know how to be ethical and moral? Well according to the Holy Bible, God is very much still active in His creation and in a variety of ways.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays