Preview

The Ford Pinto Case: A Dangerous Product

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ford Pinto Case: A Dangerous Product
THE FORD PINTO CASE
A Dangerous Product
On 10 August 1978 Judy Ann Ulrich, eighteen, was driving a 1973 Ford Pinto to volley-ball practice in Goshen, Indiana. Inside the car with her were her sister Lynn Marie, sixteen, and their cousin Donna Ulrich, eighteen. As they were heading north on U.S. Route 33, their car was struck from behind by a 1972 Chevrolet van. The Pinto collapsed like an accordion; the fuel tank ruptured; and the car exploded in flames. Lynn Marie and Donna burned to death in the car. Judy Ann was pulled from the wreckage but died from her injuries several hours later at a hospital. Two months earlier, Ford had recalled all Pintos produced from 1971 to 1976 to repair their defective gas tanks. The recall effort by Ford only
…show more content…
At that speed a fuel tank should not rupture. The defense produced two witnesses who testified that before she died, Judy Ann Ulrich had said her car was not moving when it was struck at about 50 MPH, an impact that no subcompact could withstand. The jury took twenty-five hours to conclude that Ford should be exonerated of the charges. While Ford officials celebrated the victory and the defense counsel said that he hoped the verdict, "would discourage prosecutions like this in the future," many legal experts thought it would not. In fact, in the years since, it has not. In many states corporations or their directors have been held criminally responsible for actions that their corporations took that resulted in foreseeable harm to the public. Ford may have won the battle, but it woke corporate America up to the fact that it could lose the war if it did not begin acting more responsibly.
"The Ford Pinto case is mentioned in most Business Ethics texts as an example of Cost-Benefit analysis, yet in those formats any appreciation of the complexity surrounding the issues of such decisions is overly simplified. As a thorough study, this book provides material that enriches the entire idea
…show more content…
This one lawsuit was three times what Ford executives and engineers had estimated their final cost would be.

Safety
Strange as it may seem, the Department of Transportation (NHTSA's parent agency) didn't know whether or not this was true. So it contracted with several independent research groups to study auto fires. The studies took months, which was just what Ford wanted. In May 1978 the Department of Transportation announced that the Pinto fuel system had a "safety related defect" and called for a recall. Ford agreed, and on June 9, 1978 the company recalled 1.5 million Pintos.
The recall came too late to save Ford's reputation. Millions of dollars in lawsuits were filed and won against the automaker, including the largest personal injury judgment ever. And in the 1979 landmark case State of Indiana v. Ford Motor Co., Ford notoriously became the first American corporation ever indicted or prosecuted on criminal homicide charges. Though Ford was acquitted of reckless homicide in March 1980, the Pinto's reputation had plummeted disastrously; Ford ceased production of the car five months after the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Denny V Ford

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nancy approached a legal battle on three grounds. First, was a strict products liability. A manufacturer who places a product on the market in a defective condition is liable for injury which results from use of the product when the product is used for its intended or reasonably foreseeable purpose. In order for Nancy to use this claim the she had to prove by that Ford Motor Company placed the Bronco II on the market in a defective condition. According to the United States Second Circuit of appeals, “A product is defective if it is not reasonably safe. I instruct you that if the Bronco II, at the time it left the seller's hands, was so likely to be harmful to people that a reasonable manufacturer or person who had actual knowledge of its potential for producing injury would…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Did Ford exhibit “malice” which is necessary to establish in order to award punitive damages? (Yes)…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cooper, Lance. (2014). GM Chose Not to Implement a Fix for Ignition Problem. GM Recall.…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three technical issues that are in this case are, one, when James Neal was giving his testimony, he stated that because the car that got hit by the van wasn’t moving and gas was leaking from the car due to the lady forgetting to put the gas cap back on,…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Ford Pinto: it had defects and automobile products that contributed to accidents and fatalities despite greater attention to safety features.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before JOLLY, JONES and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.John Escamilla (argued), Rodriguez, Tovar, Calvillo & Garcia, McAllen, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. David C. Duggins (argued), Trek C. Doyle, Clark, Thomas & Winters, Austin, TX, for Chrysler Corp. David Richard Tippetts, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Houston, TX, for TRW Inc. and TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. Keith Neill Uhles, Ewing Edben Sikes, III, Jon Daniel Brooks, Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, Brownsville, TX, for Morton Intern., Inc.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When I read the General Motors Misled Grieving Families on a Lethal Flaw, an overwhelming sadness fell upon me. I was sad that 26 families had to bury family members die to faulty equipment in the Chevrolet Cobalts. The key ethical issue is that General Motors knew that the black boxes in the Cobalts confirmed the potential fatal defect existing in hundreds of thousands of cars (Stout et al., 2014). Another ethical issue was the fact that GM would tell the families of the victims that they had no knowledge of any defects in their cars and once the families wanted to sue they would threaten to come after them or even said they would sue the families. One more issue that is ethical is GM didn’t immediately recall the Chevy Cobalts after the first…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    One of the biggest automotive news stories in the latter part of the 1970’s dealt with tales of exploding Ford Pintos and the considerable awards civil court juries were presenting to victims of accidents involving the cars.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinto Fires Case Study

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After watching this video where Danny Gioia talks about his time at Ford and listening to these students pick his brain about his experience with the Pinto Fires scenario. Overall, after reading the case and Gioia’s personal memoir about his experience and how he grew, I felt strongly connected to his case. After writing my ethical dilemma paper, I found myself falling into scripting my unethical behavior and also not fully being aware of their ethical situation. I knew that something felt weird about my situation, but I did not explicitly acknowledge it as an ethical dilemma with multiple values in conflict. I understand how after working at Ford for a while, and falling into automated actions that…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinto Fires

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pinto fires case is about a series of accidents involving the Ford Pinto’s fuel tank bursting into flames if struck from the rear. A 1978 suit against Ford Motor Co. for the murder of 3 teenagers brought the incidents to the public attention as it was the first time a major corporation was charged in a criminal case beyond negligence (Trevino, 2011).…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This recall caused 270 complaints, 80 crashes and 46 deaths. As this incident continued, it raised the rate of endangerment to over 100 deaths and 500 injuries involving such incidents, making this one of the most serious cases of product failure in US history. When the public got involved with the case, it caused more issues with the Firestone-equipped Ford Explorers. Ford and Firestone responded by putting all the blame from each other’s companies. The CEO of the Firestone company claimed that the accidents could be attributed to driver error and poor tire maintenance by consumers. Throughout this issue of the Ford-Firestone tire crisis, their defense involved not believing that the tires were defective and being held accountable for accidents to people got into because of this defective product. Even when Firestone’s own investigation found evidence of material and design the tires had many defects to it. Ford’s CEO blamed the problem of the recall of Firestone. The CEO clearly stated that the accidents had nothing to do with the auto-maker and claimed that the Firestone company is liable because of the tire not Ford because it manufactures the vehicle not the…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Company Pinto

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In our opinion, we think that Ford Company is morally wrong if the savings resulting from not improving the Pinto gas tank had been passed on to force’s customers. We will say is morally wrong because Pinto do not meet the safety standard propose by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The safety standard of NHTSA is to reduce fires from traffic collisions. This standard required that all new cars produced by 1972 should be able to withstand a rear-end impact of 20 mph without fuel lost and 30 mph when 1973. The result shows that Pinto had ruptured gas tanks and dangerous leaks.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various plaintiffs sued Mitsubishi Motors Corporation after a sport utility vehicle rolled over while driven on a freeway. The trial court entered an order granting the defense a motion to disqualify plaintiff’s legal team and experts. The California Court of Appeal affirmed its decision and plaintiffs sought review.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the trial there were four factors indentified that proved negligence and strict liability by Ford Motor Company. The design of the Pinto fuel system, the knowledge or failed crash tests by the Pinto prior to placing the car in the market, the Ford Motor Company cost benefit analysis, and the management’s decision to go forward…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Ford Pinto

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The moral issue of the Ford Pinto case is whether or not Ford Company is responsible for the explosion caused by the failed tank. Ford is morally responsible for the incident since it could have been prevented, public safety should be their top priority when designing their products, and they have disregarded the utilitarianism principle.…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays