Since his style of writing is in such great details, he has been able to keep readers on the edge of their seats and craving for more. Not only does he describe everything in such detail that the reader can almost picture Stockholm and the characters that are involved in the story, but also the details that he uses are not the common like “he was wearing a suit and tie” but breaks those detail down even further. A good example of this is how he describes Salander:, “Armansky’s star researcher was a pale, anorexic young woman who had hair as short as fuse, and a pierced nose and eyebrows. She looked as though she had just emerged from a week-long orgy with a gang of hard rockers” (Larsson p 41). Another example would be, “It was right next to a jetty, with the water three paces from the door. It was only fifteen by eighteen feet but it had such a high ceiling that there was space for a sleeping loft. She could stand up straight there, just.” (Larsson p
Since his style of writing is in such great details, he has been able to keep readers on the edge of their seats and craving for more. Not only does he describe everything in such detail that the reader can almost picture Stockholm and the characters that are involved in the story, but also the details that he uses are not the common like “he was wearing a suit and tie” but breaks those detail down even further. A good example of this is how he describes Salander:, “Armansky’s star researcher was a pale, anorexic young woman who had hair as short as fuse, and a pierced nose and eyebrows. She looked as though she had just emerged from a week-long orgy with a gang of hard rockers” (Larsson p 41). Another example would be, “It was right next to a jetty, with the water three paces from the door. It was only fifteen by eighteen feet but it had such a high ceiling that there was space for a sleeping loft. She could stand up straight there, just.” (Larsson p