Preview

The Human Side Of Enterprise: An Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Human Side Of Enterprise: An Analysis
All managers, employers and business owners are inherently responsible for ensuring that they develop the most productive workforce possible. Sometimes this can be accomplished by issuing comprehensive and clear direction to each employee with the expectation that they will be followed to the letter, regardless of the employee’s opinion or input. Other times it can be accomplished by providing the employees with an end result and allowing the employees to accomplish the end goal in whichever fashion they desire within certain parameters. Undoubtedly, the two methods offer two different approaches to getting to the same thing, the end result of the product. In his book, The Human Side of Enterprise, Douglas McGregor’s introduces Theory X and …show more content…
Essentially, Theory X assumes that the primary source of most employee motivation is monetary, with security as a strong second.” (Introduction to Business, 2016, Motivating Employees)
“Theory X and Theory Y,” n.d. adds that workers “need to be supervised at every step” and that they may need to be enticed or threatened to produce the desired results. “Theories X and Y,” 2008 continues with the fact that “[Theory X] has a ready-made excuse for failure—the innate limitations of all human resources.” Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, those strictly following the concept of Theory Y assume
…show more content…
They tend to work on the belief that you get fair pay for fair work. Additionally, their rewards for superior performance are simplified, usually monetary, and are usually “part of the overall mechanisms of control and remuneration. (“Theory X and Theory Y,” n.d.). As “Theories X and Y,” (2008) expresses, “[it] reflects an underlying belief that management must counteract an inherent human tendency to avoid work.” Theory X organizations are more likely to have more supervisors at every step of operation, reducing opportunities for delegation, thus maintaining authority and control centralization. Even back in the 60’s, “McGregor recognized that X-Type workers are in fact usually the minority, and yet in mass organizations, such as large scale production [and unskilled production line work] environment, X Theory management [has its place,] may be required and can be unavoidable. (“Theory X and Theory Y,” n.d.) On the other hand, Theory Y organizations focuses on motivating the employees by providing them with the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process with the expectation that “people will exercise self-direction and self-control in the achievement of organizational objectives to the degree that they are committed to those objectives”. It is management's main task in such a system to maximize that commitment.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    According to Kreitner and Kinicki (2013) McGregor contrasted two views on human nature by insisting that Theory Y assumes that people are more positive at work, and believed managers could accomplish more by viewing employees as such (p.9). The other outdated theory, is Theory X, which is a more negative and pessimistic assumption about workers.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    unit 650

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    whilst these assumptions about staff have aspects that are caricatured or stereotyped there has been a a degree of acceptance that in large, mass production organisations theory X is more relevant, partly because theory Y is difficult to apply. However theory Y is considered to be relevant to organisations where there is a commitment from staff to the organisations objectives. Where staff are able to apply direction and autonomy then they can work better than if they had been carrying out specific directed instuctions.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1960, Douglas McGregor wrote The Human Side of Enterprise, which framed two sets of molds about human nature. The first one is Theory X is unenthusiastic and negative. It assumptions people don’t like working and must be forced to do their work, avoid responsibility and have little motivation. As Kopelman and et al. (2012) stated “the manager who holds Theory X beliefs may unwittingly engineer a low level of employee motivation and (ironically) lament to a colleague that you can't get good workers nowadays” (pg. 451). Theory Y is the counterpart. In this Theory, mangers assume employees can be self-motivated, committed, responsible and creative workers. Whole Foods hires people that are well-trained who flourish in their workplace because they are happy with their jobs. John Mackey, the Cofounder and Co-CFO believes that “happy team members result in happy customers (Kreitner & Kincki, 2012).…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mgt 330

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages

    2. Be familiar with Theory X and Theory Y managers (teachers). (Table 1-2, p. 7) Outdated Theory X – most people hate work and need to be directed, they must be threatened with punishment before they will work….Modern Theory Y – work is natural, people can direct themselves, people will become oriented with organizational goals is they are rewarded for doing so, typical employee can welcome responsibility, typical person is creative, imaginative and has ingenuity.…

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt 350 Exam 3 Notes

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Theory Y - the assumption that employees like work, are creative, seek responsibility, and can exercise self-direction…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    business 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question #1: How do scientific management and Theory X differ from the human relations movement of Theory Y? Theory X is the concept that assumes that working employees dislike work and will function effectively only in a highly controlled work environment, where as Theory Y assumes that employees accept responsibility and work towards organizational goals if by doing so they also achieve personal rewards.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to a number of different studies on behavioral approach to management, especially that of McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y, manager’s expectations on workers through the self-fulfilling prophecies will affect workers’ attitudes and hence their productivity. Essentially, McGregor’s theory of X and Y introduces two types of behaviors of managers. The first type, which McGregor considers inappropriate, thinks that workers they are irresponsible, lack of ambition, dislike their work and will only do the things that they have been told. The second type, however, thinks that workers are always motivated to work, willing to take responsibility and are willing to take extra steps. By analyzing BCH’s current approach to management, we will be able to consider how the study on behavioral approach to management can be realistically incorporated and therefore create greater value to the company.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hi Hi Hi Hi

    • 11978 Words
    • 48 Pages

    | According to McGregor's Theory Y, managers could accomplish more by believing that employees require close direction when they are working.…

    • 11978 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory X managers believe that their employees want to be managed. That they are lazy. That they do not want to improve themselves and need constant monitoring.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory X being the pessimistic as the employee does not like work and tries to escape it whenever possible and has little or no ambition of achieving the company goals. Employee needs a directive leader. Theory X leader is results-driven, intolerant, distant, poor listener, demands, etc. Companies with Theory X leadership will usually have poor results.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    McGregor grouped employees hierarchy need into lower-order needs (Theory X) and higher-order needs (Theory Y), and opined that “these two opposing perceptions conjectured how people view human behavior at work and organizational life” (Wambugu, 2014). For instance, Theory X assumed that management's role in the organization is to pressurize and control employees to perform based on the insinuation that human beings are pressure seekers who dislike work; do not want responsibility, and have little or no ambition etc. as such it's the duty of managers to make them do their job, and often with threats of punishment in order to get them to achieve the organizational objectives. On the other hand, Theory Y assumed that management's role in an organization involves developing the potential in employees and help them to achieve their maximum potential towards common organizational goals based on the views that people among other things learn to accept and seek responsibility, creativity, ingenuity which will have the potential to boost the organizational performance (Wambugu, 2014). These theories could be used by management either ways to encourage employees, but better results would be gained by the use of Theory Y, rather than Theory X (McGregor,…

    • 3719 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory Y and X

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Douglas McGregor, an American Social Psychologist, proposed X-Y theory in his 1960 book “The human side of enterprise”. Theories X and Y are still referred in the field of management and motivation. According to McGregor’s Ideas, he believes there are two fundamental approaches to managing people. Past results show that many managers use theory X, which on average produces poor results. However, open-minded managers use theory y, which produces better performances and results, allowing employees as well as managers to grow and develop within their field of expertise.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory Y, by Douglas McGregor, suggests that employees naturally love to work, finding inherent satisfaction in their careers. The focus of supervision in Theory Y is the managers ' role as facilitator and teacher. Theory Y managers believe that all they have to do is provide a pleasant, healthy, engaging work environment…

    • 4948 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Goal-Setting Theory

    • 3079 Words
    • 13 Pages

    According to the book Organisational Behaviour on the Pacific Rim (2007), motivation is the “forces within a person that affect his or her direction, intensity and persistence of voluntary behaviour in the workplace”. This means that compared to a non-motivated employee, a motivated one is willing to consistently (persistence) give more effort to their job (intensity) to achieve the desired goal or goals (direction). Today, motivating employees is important and has become more challenging for employers due to the fact that an engaged workforce result in greater performance, productivity and success for the business. This is why many managers want to find ways on how to motivate their subordinates so that the employees are willing to contribute to the firm with full potential as it will affect the corporate performance. In order to motivate subordinates effectively, managers need to have a better understanding of motivation which is why there are numerous theories that try to explain the term. Motivation theories can be grouped into two types, the “Need Theories” and the cognitive psychology evaluation theories. The “Need Theories” are the “Hierarchy of Needs Theory”, the “Theory X and Theory Y”, the “Two-Factor Theory”, the “Four-Drive Theory” and lastly the “ERG Theory”. Whereas for the cognitive evaluation, there are the “Job-Design Theory”, the “Reinforcement Theory”, the “Expectancy Theory”, the “Equity Theory and finally the “Goal-setting Theory suggested by E.A Locke, which will be discuss in detail in this essay because this theory has become the most effective and widely used motivational tool that has been supported with many years of empirical research (Barsky 2008).…

    • 3079 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory X and Y

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Douglas McGregor, an American social psychologist, proposed his famous X-Y theory in his 1960 book 'The Human Side Of Enterprise '. Theory x and theory y are still referred to commonly in the field of management and motivation, and whilst more recent studies have questioned the rigidity of the model, Mcgregor 's X-Y Theory remains a valid basic principle from which to develop positive management style and techniques. McGregor 's XY Theory remains central to organizational development, and to improving organizational culture.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays