I think that the internet has reshaped the political landscape because the internet spreads information fast, politicians must stay in the know so they can react fast. The availability of information on the Internet has effected how people view politicians and politics as a whole because the Internet informs and empowers Americans. The Internet can benefit politicians directly by having many tools on the internet to help them communicate with voters such as an e-mail distribution list, blog, twitter account, or a podcast. Politics has changed the Internet because it's lightning fast and Politicians must be able to react quickly to what's happening in the world. I think that the internet is a great way for politicians to use to their advantage because it's all about communication a message, and the internet is a great platform for just that. Politicians could use today's technology like e-mail, websites,…
Politicians have to keep up with the fast pace of the media. Utilizing internet websites, blogs, and social networks is a way for them to play a part in this form of media. Americans have more information then ever at thier fingertips and this allows them to make a better…
President Obama has his success in media harness. Back in 2007, he was just an anonymous senator from Illinois[1]. Yet a year later, he successfully turned himself from a little-known senator into the Democratic nominee and 6 months later became the 44th president of the United States after winning the election against Republican candidate John McCain. Deep inside, a major success factor for Obama’s victory was how Obama’s campaign used social media and technology as an integral part of its strategy, to raise money, and, more importantly, to develop a groundswell of empowered volunteers who felt they could make a difference.…
The rise of the technology in the political world has led to unchecked Internet. Unchecked Internet has exploited various amounts of dangers within the political world. The first highly noted problem is misinformation. The Internet is mostly unmonitored which allows people to post misleading and false information about politics unlike newspapers, magazines, and television networks, where editors and fact-checkers ensure correct information is disputed to the public. In political campaigns misinformation can have a major impact on the outcome of the poll and the support in which the candidate receives and which who they receive that support from. Also, misinformation can change the way the public views the candidate. In addition, Internet has factored in the decline in political civility. Bloggers sometimes use the Internet as a weapon to attack the opponent and ruin their reputation by posting lies and slander. The unchecked Internet also allows the problem of possessing a host of unknown potentialities. National elections through computer terminals could be hacked into and cause a political crisis. Unchecked Internet can be managed around however it will still be out there. Factual information is always used by newspapers, magazines, and television networks, because they have fact –checkers unlike bloggers whom may post whatever they are so inclined to. Ones best chance to receive true information about a political candidate or a political issue is to rely on the sources stated above unlike a blog. By doing so one can receive credible information that is not misleading and make certain it is valuable…
The Internet has reshaped the political landscape to where politicians keep up with technology to be current. The Internet is a tool of which gossip and bad news about politics spreads very quickly, so politicians must be able to react quickly. The Internet has changed how people view politics and politicians as a whole. The Internet empowers Americans to participate in the political process, and enables those who want to be more involved in the political process. Politicians can directly benefit from the Internet from gathering news, but also allows for politicians to communicate with constituents. The Internet has changed politics by adding lightning speed to information, allowing more voter participation, and giving the politicians the ability to react quickly to what is happening in the world.…
Sometimes it takes some sleuthing on the 'about' page or using a search engine to learn what the site is really about. All websites are not 100 percent credible, perfection is impossible to achieve. There are sites quiet credible, but that's no guarantee. One reporter could be dishonorable, or one article will mess up the facts. Some tomes it could be possible that you are reading gossip, not news. You have to be careful about what you choose to believe on the internet. There is a lot of poorly researched, biased; sensationalist stuff out there. Nothing is business as usual any more. Anybody could get a website, and it only take twenty second to say something before it's on YouTube. The internet had increased the availability of information about the political landscape here and across the country. Politicians have to constantly pay attention to websites so they are always in the know. The availability of internet lets American participate in the political process more. Internet could benefit politician directly, however they could use internet to reach their constituents more often. Starting an email distribution list, a blog, twitters account, a podcast-anything to help them spread the message to as many people possible.…
Due to the fact that people are becoming more and more attached to social media rather than interpersonal relationships, they are making themselves vulnerable to online political influence and persuasion. Individuals who live through social media have made themselves dependent on information that is provided to them on their select networks. They also are more likely to trust what they read online rather than what they may hear directly from a political leader first hand. Those who are more likely to generate replies, begin conversations, and distribute information are the main persuaders throughout all media. These persuaders are referred to as “prosumers” which is the combination of producers and consumers. This word choice was chosen because these individuals are supplying user-generated content online while at the same time-consuming information as well. Researchers believe that if these prosumers continue to use social media as they do then they will eventually begin to engage in politics more and more. After a while, these social media prosumers will acknowledge themselves as actual opinion leaders. An online leader is described as someone who is engaging in larger levels of media exposure and tends to hold a greater position in social networks. Opinion leaders indirectly…
The internet has allowed American's to be able to gather information from the comfort of their own home. The internet has reshaped the political landscape because the internet spreades information fast, so they can react fast. The availability of information on the internet has affected how people view politicans and politics as a whole. The internet enables americans who want to be more involved in political process. The internet benefits politicans directly, their are alot of tools politicans can use to communicate with voters: email, blog, twitter, podcast. Politics have changed due to the internet is now lightning speed. They can react quickly to whats happening in the world. The internet could enables bloggers and commenteres to be salacious, rude and vulgar. But overall the internet allows politicans to see much more deeply into American psyche. Internet allows people to feeling through blogs just like if they was in a town hall meeting face to face. Conclusion: I never have used the internet has a great source but after doing research for the Senator I have more faith in our internet just have to double check your sources. I Hope you can start to access the web more on topics you would like to learn about.…
The internet has changed the way news is conveyed because it is now easier to personally search key terms regarding political information instead of relying on specific news sources. Although politics has become easier to research, politics is a smaller subject compared to other topics in the internet. For instance, Americans are more particularly interested in popular culture rather than politics; before election day, only 12% of hits regarded political information. The positives of relying on the internet for our news include strengthening a citizen’s opinion after backing up their views with political information, in addition, campaigning websites has allowed for better communication and the ability to reply and critique an internet platform. In contrast, the drawbacks of internet reliance for news comprise of one-sided news articles that are potentially biased along with false blogs and news articles that may delude…
In today’s social media it is easier for people to get their word out to the people faster. This past election has influenced heavily by social media along with other major new events earlier in the year. Among 18-29-year-olds, nearly two-thirds said social media is the most useful means of learning new things about politics according to a study released last year by the Pew Research Center (Perrin, 2015). This past year has shown a drastic increase in the use of social media among young adults and even people in their 40’s and 50’s when it comes to following the news and current events. 65% of american adults use social networking sites and young adults 18-29 are sitting at an all time high of 90% according to the Pew Research Center (Perrin, 2015). We all saw Donald Trump use social media to his advantage during this past election and many predict this will be a new trend in…
Thompson, Nicolas. "The Internet and Political Campaigns." 16 June 2003. Globalist. 26 March 2007 .…
It is not yet possible to vote online, but, candidates communicate with us through e-mail. They have websites for their campaign as well as Twitter and Facebook accounts to communicate with us - their potential voters. Technological advances have led to a political conversation on the web. According to an empirical study, however, this only reinforces the status quo, particularly in terms of the socioeconomic status of a person. The Internet did not expand the base of voters. Access to the Internet has grown. Younger citizens by an overwhelming margin tend to have access to the Internet in comparison to older Americans. This leads to a theory, due to generational transfer, there will be a higher percentage of users of the Internet in the future…
References: Boogers, M. & Voerman, G. (2002). “Surfing citizens and floating voters,” Central of law, Public Administration and Information, Tilburg University. Breitenbach, C.S and Van Doren, D.C. (1998). “Value-added Marketing in the Digital Domain: Enhancing the utility of the Internet;” Journal of Consumer Marketing. Conway, M. and Dorner, D. (2004). “An Evaluation of New Zealand Political Party Website,” Information Research. Djupsund, C. and Carlson, T. (2002). “Catching the „Wired Voters‟? Campaigning on the Internet,” Department of Science, Åbo Academy University, Finland. Flak, L.S., Moe, C.E. and Saebo, Q. (2003). “On the evolution of E-government: The user imperative,” Department of Information Systems, Agder University College. Gibson, R., Nixon, P. and Ward, S. (2004). “Net gain-or net pain? Political parties and the Internet,” Information Polity. Hansen, K.M., Pedersen, K. and Whal-Jorgensen, D. (2005). ”Cyber campaigning. The character, development and consequences of parties‟ electioneering in cyber-space,” Department of political science, University of Copenhagen. Kent, M.L. (1999). “Does your web site attract or repel customer? Three tests of Web site effectiveness,” Public Relations Quarterly. Kent, M.L., Taylor, M. and White, W.J. (2003). “The Relationship between Web site Design and Organizational Responsiveness to Stakeholders,” Public relations Review. Moon, M.J. (2002). “The Evolution of E-government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?,” Public Administration Review. Norris, P. (2001). “Preaching to the Converted? Pluralism, Participation, and Party websites.” Rowley, T.J. (1997). “Moving beyond Dyadic ties: a Network Theory of Stakeholder influences,” Academy of Management review. Selm, M.V., Jankowski, N.W. and Tsaliki, L. (2002). “Political Parties Online: Digital Democracy as Reflected in Three Dutch Political Party Web Sites,” Communications. Ward, S. and Gibson, R. (2003). “On-line and on Message? Candidate Websites in 2001 General Election,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(2), 188-205. Internet Sources scholar.google.co.in www.democrats.org www.gop.com www.bjp.org www.cpim.org…
Saar D. Golde, & Norman H. Nie (2010). The Effects of Online News on Political Behavior.…
Online social networks provide us with convenient platform for such analysis. The data from many social networks is publicly available. Furthermore, social media has emerged as a significant platform for discussion and dissemination of political information. For example, Pew surveys (Smith, 2011) found that 22% of adult Internet users participated in political campaigns through at least one of the major social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Myspace during the 2010 U.S. elections. However, people would not use social media regularly for interaction that lead to political engagement.…