In today’s society the biggest reason for book banning is based on protecting moral values set in place in the home. Well meaning teacher, parents, and other would be censors worry that by exposing the nation’s youth to concepts such as sex, drugs, and alcohol they will start experimenting with these things. Ultimately they fear the breakdown of the moral values emphasized in the home. This is especially true for conservative Christians, in the past ten years books such as J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series and, Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials have caused a great deal of controversy among conservative Christians. The idea of magic, alternate and parallel universes is not a popular one among Conservative Christians. But does this really warrant all out banning books such as these? Most would say no, the ideals of a certain group should not determine what the rest of the population reads.…
Books all over America are in danger. Books, objects that allow imagination and the expansion of the mind and the world around one, are often times subject to criticism and even bannings when any one person does not like the content. Books bannings should not be done whatsoever, let alone become a semi-common practice. Of course, bannings only occur after careful consideration. Or do they? Censorship is a growing problem in America, as parents and other authority figures ban various types of books in their community when content is too “edgy” or “age inappropriate”, and these are often gone through without the book so much as being opened. However, in all reality, what might be “wrong” for one child may be just right for another. Are book…
I believe that every person should have the option to read whatever they want. Many schools claim they ban books because they do not want students to act out or feel uncomfortable. Schools are afraid that their students are going to achieve the violent crimes that are mentioned in the books. In the article "Banned Books" the article states," The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees our right to free speech...includes the right…
Many of these classic stories have been banned because of sexual references, racial slurs, religious intolerance, or supposed witchcraft promotion. Although some may consider these books controversial or inappropriate, many English classes have required their students to read these books (About banned). It should be believed that even controversial books could ultimately boost, not deter, our educational wealth. Book banning should be opposed for three main reasons: education should be open to everyone, citizens should have access to the press, and, lastly, parents should monitor what their own children read and not what other children can obtain. For these reasons, I conclude that the government should play no role in what books any age group can obtain.…
Education is undeniably being limited to these children much like it was for Douglass; by banning such literature they will not receive the chance to read about very important values and become better educated about world affairs and classic themes. By Fredrick Douglass finding a way to teach himself how to read and write, he learned many things he did not know such as the true state of the world: what the public school children are missing out on, getting to expand their knowledge of the world, and maybe even be able to live in it better. By the banning of these books, the government is not only interfering with a child’s educational development, but keeping them in the dark to where they do not even know what they are missing out on, just as Fredrick Douglass did not know what he was missing and once he found out it only made him desire an education more. Fredrick Douglass had a master who was superior to him and did not want him to be educated because he would know too much. Just like Douglass, the students too have a superior…
It’s ignorant to even challenge a book because of its content. In the article, Schools and Censorship: Banned Books it states that, “Every day someone tries to control or otherwise restrict oral expressions, broadcast messages, or written words.” Trying to control what others read is foolish! In fact, Everyone should have the right to read what they want. Especially teenagers, which are entering adulthood and should know to make the right decisions. Moreover, in the article it also states that “our basic right — the freedom to express ourselves as we see fit — is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States' Constitution, ensuring the freedom to express one's opinion even if that opinion might be considered unpopular or unorthodox.” It’s like our right is being violated. Many children are being pulled away from books because they contain certain things that their parents think are not appropriate for their age, but it’s not like they should hide those things from…
As a society we want our young people to be literate, thoughtful, and caring human beings, however we also attempt to control what they read, listen to, and seeand ultimately what they think and care about. One can understand the instinct to need to "protect" children from dangerous or disturbing ideas and information, but this combination of the multiplicity of values and the concern for young people's minds…
Throughout the years, books from classics to young adult novels have been banned.. Books are an essential part of education. They have always been there to teach children, but all over the country, books are being prohibited. Certain books are not only banned in schools but they are also banned in libraries, and bookstores, limiting public access to specific pieces of literature. These books are banned for because they include profanity, or sometimes having different opinions than the majority of the population. However, Books should not be banned in schools because banning certain books prevents freedom of speech, keeps readers away from reality, and limits learning tools.…
Each year, hundreds of individuals attempt to take books off the shelves of school libraries. Banning books takes away our privilege, as American citizens, to read what we want (Source 1). If people are offended by a book, depriving the entire state of their ability to read that certain book is not the solution. There are various other ways to ensure that parents who do not want their children to read particular books without abolishing them from the entire school. Banning books from schools restrains students from their first amendment rights by taking away their freedom of press and in some cases, religion (Source 1).…
It is well known that reading to children, especially throughout the toddler and pre-school years, is positively correlated with increased reading and literacy levels throughout the school-age years. One particular study (Lee, 2010) investigated the impact of reading to children specifically during morning transitional periods at a childcare facility. The implications of this study show that there could be numerous benefits linked to parents reading to their children during these periods in particular.…
e second reason schools should not ban books is that kids should know about the real world.This is important because you don’t want your child to be oblivious to the world around them. University Wire says“By removing or banning books from schools, you are depriving the students from having these experiences and learning from them. You stop protecting them from the world and start damaging their growth and ability to live in it properly. Banning hurts more than it helps, and when it happens, no one wins." (University Wire) This quote validates that kids should know about the world they live in.Clearly, kids should know about the world around them.The last reason that schools should not ban books is kids sometimes need a book to open up their…
The banning of books in modern day school systems has been very controversial recently. Some believe that restricting a student’s right to read any desired book is almost as immoral as it was to restrict African American slaves the right to learn how to read or write. Frederick Douglass, a slave who was denied the right to an education, went against the beliefs of his slave owners, and eventually became a highly educated man who led the abolitionist movement and wrote many inspiring speeches. The banning of books from schools and libraries is similar to Frederick Douglass being prevented from learning to read because both victims were hindered from learning to their full potential, didn’t get to make their own decisions, and both have had to go out of their way to educate themselves.…
According to the First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment or religion, or prohibited the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press…” therefore stating the government cannot deprive the people of getting information from associations other than themselves. It is at a person‘s own free will of what they decide to read or watch. Even though some books and ideas damage the thoughts of the youth’s mind, guidance to what is right or wrong can lead a student to the right path, along with additional information to what is wrong. Children’s rights cannot be taken away from libraries or schools, including other organizations that give away the knowledge of the real world. In summary, it is illegal to ban the books that are free to a child’s hand.…
Teenagers are reading more books than ever now, and some people say that we have Harry Potter to thank. But surrounding teen books is the 'myth' of book banning. Some may think that only old books were banned, and that they are now back on the shelves of schools and libraries around the country. This is not so. Not only have old classics such as The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger been banned, but newer books are being challenged as well. The controversy of book banning stems from the pursuit of knowledge. Though Hitler did many bad things in his lifetime schools still teach about the Holocaust, and yet now parents are requesting that their children do not learn what certain books have to offer in the way of knowledge. But some parents do not stop there. Books are being taken off school shelves, depriving all students instead of just one. Can one person influence a whole school or town? Is this even fair to everyone involved? The answer is no. Book banning should be illegal because reading a book is an individual choice, some books are banned without much thought, and sometimes books are banned without all parties involved reading it.…
They each have gone through different experiences and have formed to become the person they are different from any other person. Therefore, the only person who can decide what they want to read, or wat is against their own personal set of morals is themself. By banning books or censoring books, people can not choose for themselves, limiting their freedom given to them by the government. If a particular person does not approve of a topic, idea or theme in a novel, then they do not have to read it, but trying to have it banned is not allowing others to make that judgement for themselves (Harvey, Linda). Some may say that libraries or publishers are not trustworthy of protecting the youth of today from ideas that they see as “wrong’ or “immoral” (Manning, Erin). Should those readers not be allowed to decide for themselves what they believe is good or bad? For example, the way that today's teens have grown up is completely different than that of their parents or grandparents. These teens see the world differently, than the adults of the world. While it is important to learn from past mistakes, should the older members be allowed to continue to dictate what youth read and ultimately come to believe (Harvey, Linda)? A recent study has shown that adults are more likely to support censoring or banning books while most youth are against it (Rampell, Catherine). Neil Gaiman once said, “ Ideas- written ideas are special. They are the…