Preview

The Judiciary

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Judiciary
The Judiciary

Introduction:
This question raises the issues of the constitutional position of the judiciary and the significance of judicial independence for the operation of the rule of law. We will consider recent changes to the leadership of the judiciary and the process of judicial appointment.

Judges are expected to be personally independent in the sense that they must decide cases purely on the strict application of the law to the evidence presented, irrespective of personal preference or any interest in the outcome. They must be fearless in their judgment, demonstrating moral courage as well as legal accuracy. Judicial independence also refers to the institutional independence of the judiciary so that the judiciaries are separate from the influence of the executive and the legislature.

Changes introduced by the CRA 2005:
Role of Lord Chancellor:
The Constitutional Reform Act (CRA) 2005 introduced profound changes to the leadership of the judiciary, to the position of the final court of appeal and to the appointment of judges.
The modern position, prior to the constitutional changes in 2005, was that the Lord Chancellor was the head of the judiciary and the most senior judge in the English court structure. But the Lord Chancellor was a political appointment made by the current serving Prime Minister and once appointed the Lord Chancellor had a seat in the Cabinet, with responsibility for running the government department that deals with the operation of the justice system – the Lord Chancellor’s Department (renamed the Department for Constitutional Affairs in 2003 and renamed again in 2007 the Ministry of Justice). In addition to being the head of the judiciary and a member of the government, the Lord Chancellor also had a ceremonial role in the legislature being the ‘Speaker of the House of Lords’, the upper chamber of Parliament.
The position of the Lord Chancellor did not raise significant constitutional concerns until after the passing of the HRA

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How far do Sources 1, 2 and 3 suggest that, in his role as Lord Chancellor,…

    • 591 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regarding the decision making, the appointed judge under this pretext is less likely to be influenced by the opinions of the public, and therefore the probability of delivering fair judgments is high than in the case where politics are used as a determining factor of the judges’ fitness and capability.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the case getting major attention and making it very historical, it bought the Judicial Branch of the legislature on an all the more even power premise with the Legislative and Executive Branches. The Founding fathers expected the braches of government to go about as balanced governance on one another. In spite of the fact that the quick impact of the choice was to deny energy to the court, its long-run impact has been to expand the Court’s energy by building up the tenet that it is insistently the area and obligation of the legal division to say what the law is. Since this case, the Supreme Court has been the last authority of the legality…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most intriguing element of the Constitution of the United States is the Independent Judiciary, in which judicial power for the country lies in the federal courts and operates separately from the legislative and executive branches. This institution allows for the civil settlement of conflicts and enables the fair application of the law to cases. Judicial independence ensures that federal judges aren’t punished for their decisions related to court cases and aren’t inhibited by political figures in their interpretation of the law. This tenet of the Constitution is the foundation for the generalized success and transparency of our standing judicial system and is why it has been the model for numerous systems across the globe. James Madison’s Federalist Number 51 is a fundamental interpretation of the concept of judicial independence delineated in the Constitution.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important development in the protection of rights in the UK has been the installation of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law via the Human Rights Act 1998. This act effectively has provided a document that outlines the rights of citizens. Since the passing of this act, judges have been able rule more confidently based on the legislation rather than using complex declarations of the common law. The ease for judges and clearness for citizens has increased the effectiveness of rights protection by the judiciary because now the judiciary can use articles in the HR Act to rule in favour of individuals. For example, in the case of Catherine Zeta Jones v. Hello Magazine 2001, the court was able to rule clearly that the article 8 right to privacy outweighed the magazine's article 10 right to expression and thus Zeta Jones' wedding was allowed to remain private. This clearly shows an effective protection of liberty by judges.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial independence and neutrality is an important theory - that all judges must be independent from any outside pressures, such as from a political party or cabinet minister. They may well have to sit in judgment on a politician or minister, so it is important to the political system that judges are not dependent on politicians or ministers for pay, promotion or keeping their job. Judges' decisions should be made without any fear of reprisal, however unpopular these decisions might be with a government or a political party.…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judiciary branch of the United States’ government is comprised of a system of courts, on both federal and state levels, which are used to bring justice to cases between citizens of the States. The power of judicial review gives the courts the authority “to review and, if necessary, declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional” (Ginsberg). It’s interesting that the branch that works to uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution is sometimes viewed as the “least dangerous branch” of our Government. Referring to writings such as Federalist 78 (by Alexander Hamilton) and Brutus 12 (by James Madison), clears up exactly what the judiciary was set up for, why it is important to have in our Government system, and how it might affect the other branches, the executive and legislative. It is clear while reading the works that the two writers have opposing views. Therefore, it is crucial to study both works and compare their ideas to our current Judiciary to understand how our country has undergone changes within the system.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Senate Reparations

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The High Court of Australia and the Supreme Court of the United States have important roles in determining the federal distribution of powers and acting as ‘Constitutional guardians’. Both courts also exercise their powers as ultimate appellate courts to safeguard liberal rights and to protect their citizens from arbitrary governmental powers under the rule of law. The quality of these courts is underpinned by the ‘impartiality, integrity, and independence’ of the judges, which depends largely on the framework of judicial appointments.…

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries are a panel of citizens selected randomly from the electoral role to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused, thus are a fundamental part of how the adversarial system functions. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined by the right to a fair trial. Juries enable a fair trial as they are members of the community who are making an impartial judgement based on what the two opposing sides presents to them, hence they are less prone to bias and bigoted views enabling them to improve access to justice. When a verdict is made, it is often made unanimously so there should be no doubt on the jurors mine as to whether the accused is guilty or not. There are some circumstances, when a majority verdict takes place 11 against 1 or 10 against 1, but only if deliberation has surpassed a reasonable time ( usually 8 hours ), so this allows for a fairer system. Being such a fundamental part of the adversarial system, if a jury is unable to make a verdict, it becomes a hung jury in which the case is dismissed and a retrial is ordered therefore ensuring that there is an equal opportunity for each party to present their side of the case and know that an impartial judgement will be made. Overall, since the right to a fair trial is significant in the adversary system, the juries are a pivotal reason as to how natural justice is achieved.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judical Branch

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judicial branch includes the nation’s courts, whose job it is to ensure the government follows the law. Courts also settle disagreements between different groups, and the Supreme Court has the final word in settling disagreements about what the U.S. Constitution means.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Legislative Branch "House of Representatives/Congress" has the power to veto any bill's. The Legislative Branch has the power to remove or impeach any Judge from the Judicial Branch. Also, the Judicial Branch can declare any laws unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch is made up of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and District Court. The Judicial Branch has the power for the Executive Branch to decide if the president acts are unconstitutional. The Executive Branch has the power to nomination any judge. The Executive Branch is made up of the President, Independent government agencies and executive and cabinet departments. The Executive Branch has the power to veto any congressional legislation for the Legislative Branch. Lastly,…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A court system is created to determine the innocent and the guilty when a conflict arises. In many cases it is convicting a criminal for a crime that has been committed. The system entitles everyone to a fair trial no matter what the case and in each trial it is the team that is prosecuting that most prove that if the accused is guilty. Not the accused having to prove their innocence. The victim in most cases looks to see that justice is served to the criminal. The accused looks to try and get another chance in life and to make the court believe that they can change.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first step is vote to render opinion on the case in conference. During this step, the winning side will have 5 or more votes, and the highest ranking justice of majority select who writes the opinion. Then the following steps are opinion, circulate the opinion for others opinions and potential changes, Accept others decision and make changes, then vote again. In this step, majority will announce their opinion. According to the Federal Judiciary PowerPoint, judicial activist is a philosophy of judicial decisions making that argues judges should use their power broadly to further justice, especially in the areas of equality and personal liberty, and the judicial restrained is a philosophy of judicial decision making that argues courts should allow the decisions of other branches of government to stand, even when they offend a judge’s own sense of principles. In my opinion, the judges should be an activist in a court case. Everybody knows the importance of the equality and personal liberty in this country. If the judges regret about a court case offend it, they should be…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays