Preview

The Last Detroit Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Last Detroit Summary
Canada, like most other nations, has long stratified its people through the means of social classes. In modern society, the lines between upper, middle, and lower class have become more and more blurred— to digress, some might say this is leading to the eradication of the middle class entirely— but before one can delve into the inner workings of such a time-honored convention, one must understand the aspects that categorize people into this hierarchical pyramid: family income, wealth, education, and lifestyles. These aspects, while not the only gauge for success, can, however, bring forth advantages or disadvantages typical of a certain class. In other words, people belonging to the upper class will have higher standards and expectations in …show more content…
I have always thought myself to be mindful of my country’s socio-political climate and the connotations of each social class, it is something that I am passionate about, but Mr. Bardecki’s mention of John Rawls was my first introduction to the theory of justice as fairness. From the article “John Rawls and the Liberal Theory of Society” this was one of Rawls’ bold, powerful statements that struck me the most: “A just society is a society that if you knew everything about it, you’d be willing to enter it in a random place.” I believe that this concisely states John Rawls’ philosophy of equal rights, opportunity, and promotion of the least advantaged members of society. In the aforementioned quote, Rawls suggests that for a society to be truly fair, there would be no discrimination between the classes. To simplify, you would not care whether you were to be put into the upper class or the lower class of a society because you would have the same opportunities and benefits in both. Coming from a position of moderate privilege— being born into a loving and whole family, being able to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reaching back to the 1970s, it is clear to see a new mentality was beginning to form. This mentality, brought by the incredible Pierre Trudeau was unlike any in history. He brought the idea that problems such as racism, sexism, and gender inequality were really a thing of the past, and there’s no need for it. “A just society is a society in which people don’t discriminate, where people can enjoy freedom of speech, religion, education, and equal rights and opportunities” (Breaton Lecture). Due to Trudeau, Canada has greatly worked towards creating this “Just Society”.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When someone brings up Canada, a person’s first thought might drift towards things the country is famous for, such as maple syrup, Niagara Falls, and hockey. However, what most people would not reflect on would be the rich, diverse culture of the country or the issues that Canada faced daily in the 1970s. These problems included gender inequality, economic and employment issues, and discrimination.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada is globally known as a friendly nation with endless opportunities and equal rights given to everyone. It has a reputation as a nation that cares about its people. However, is this misleading? Is Canada really a nation without any inequality? No, there are some misunderstandings when it comes to what people consider “equal.” Upon interviewing several Canadians from various groups and ages, the results show a surprising outcome of the opportunities Canada actually offers to its societies.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In A Theory of Justice, Rawls begins with the statement that, ‘‘Justice is the first virtue of social institution,’’ meaning that a good society is one structured according to principals of justice (1998). John Rawls states that when a person is covered in the veil of ignorance, a society without his/her own status known must begin in that society. They must provide a place that they could relate to for someday they may have bad luck and end up as a person on the lowest end of the ladder in society. This is one way to have a just and fair society for all to live. A place where status does not matter and no one would ever feel bad for the situation they are in.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because Rawls created two justice principles based on the assumption that everyone is behind the “veil of ignorance”. If there is no real “veil of ignorance”, Rawls’ two justice principles couldn’t be true in reality. So, what is the real justice in the reality? Question 2:…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher John Rawls aimed to determine principles of justice based on equality through his conception of the original position and the veil of ignorance. Rawls argued that individuals within a society who are in the original position would choose the difference principle to determine the allocation of resources. Rawls’ conception of justice revolves around two principles. The first principle argues that each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive system of equal basic liberties (Kymlicka, 56). The second principle presents Rawls’ two principles of justice, the difference principle and the principle of fair and equal opportunity (Kymlicka, 56).…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness suggests that all individuals live behind a veil of…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An astute egalitarian in his fundamental system of beliefs, John Rawls’s theories and assertions established him as one of the great political thinkers of the modern era. Laying out the foundation of his work in the significantly debated A Theory of Justice, Rawls addresses the problem of distributive justice in contractual manner derived from prior Enlightenment thinkers such as Locke. Through it, Rawls looks to reach an end-state goal of basic liberties, such as the right to free speech and personal property, for all people as well as establishing a system where the poorest and least-advantageous people within a society may receive the greatest benefit possible, while also being assured the equality of opportunity, just the same as everyone…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls came up with the “under a veil of ignorance” principle by which one should approach such argument without knowing the advantages or disadvantages to the situation. This ensures procedural equity in which decisions are led by justice, without the temptation to alter social conditions, therefore avoiding individuals acting by their own “self-interest” in order to promote personal goals. A Rawlsian’s response would be to disagree with the argument that income inequality is morally wrong, however only if the inequalities are arranged in such a way that it will assist the previously disadvantaged and that all people should have equal opportunity when it comes to attaining offices, positions or jobs. Like a utilitarian view, income inequality is also seen as an incentive for those in society with talent to work harder in order to make society as a whole better off, especially considering the state of the South African economy at the moment - wealth is used as an incentive as South Africa does not have the necessary finances to address those suffering from living in…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conception Of Justice

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Rawls’ has a political conception of justice that comes from “fundamental intuitive ideas regarded as latent in the public political culture.” This political conception of justice should have the hope of “gaining the support of an overlapping consensus,” which is “a consensus in which it is affirmed by the opposing religious, philosophical, and moral doctrines likely to thrive over generations in a more or less just constitutional democracy.” The overlapping consensus on the conception of justice is “moral both in its object and grounds” and is different from other consensus based on “self- or group-interest” which are “fragile.”…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rawls Social Justice

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Social justice is what people in society owe to one another in a matter of rights. It is whether people have rights and entitlements to certain kinds of political and social arrangements, and as a result, to certain social outcomes. Rawls states that social justice is a type of fairness, where the social cooperation appropriately distributes the burdens and benefits of society (1999: 4). Rawls aims to do this using the theoretical device of the Original Position. The intention of the thought experiment is to establish rules for the basic structure of society that would create a fairer society and advance the interests of the mutually disinterested parties involved. The conclusion about social justice that Rawls comes to is the two principles of the theory of justice as fairness. In this essay I will argue that Rawls’ conclusion about social justice, the theory of justice as fairness, is sound but the methodology using the Original Position and Veil of Ignorance is flawed. Rawls’s theoretical devices of the Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance do not help us to come to sound conclusions about social justice. This will be done by questioning Rawls’ assumption that…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rawls Theory

    • 3348 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Rawls’ most famous work, A Theory of Justice (1971), provides an introduction to this body of thought as well as some of its implications for ethics. Like many philosophers before him, Rawls focused upon justice because of its substantive importance for organizing and governing society.…

    • 3348 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays