Preview

The Law of Intention, Following the Cases of Woollin [1999] 1 Ac 82 and Matthews [2003] 3 Cr App R 30, Is Now Satisfactorily Defined in the Criminal Law.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1227 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Law of Intention, Following the Cases of Woollin [1999] 1 Ac 82 and Matthews [2003] 3 Cr App R 30, Is Now Satisfactorily Defined in the Criminal Law.
The law of intention, following the cases of Woollin [1999] 1 AC 82 and Matthews [2003] 3 Cr App R 30, is now satisfactorily defined in the criminal law.

Intention, normally means desire to aim at something. However, in criminal law, mens rea known as ‘guilty mine’, it requires two distinguishable intentions which are direct intention as well as oblique intention, and apart from, also recklessness. Direct intention means the consequences of the action is desired specifically, just like murder. Defendant is purposed to achieve the death or the grievous bodily harm (GBH) of the victim R v Mohan [1975]. Oblique intention also known as foresight intent, means the consequence which the defendant is not desired, however, it is going to happen when he goes ahead with his acts (Law teacher, 2012). An unsurprising side-effect would result when defendant is achieving some other consequences R V Nedrick [1986]. Under these situations, the court will remind the jury to consider how probable the consequence was foreseen by the defendant. Generally, recklessness means to take an unjustified risk. It covers the case of harm such as manslaughter or criminal damage. Objective and subjective test will be applied respectively in different cases. In other words, intention could be the worst culpability in mens rea. Follow up would be the recklessness.

In the case of R v Woollin [1999], the defendant loose temper with his three-month-old son, and picked the baby up and thrown him to a hard surface. The baby’s skull was fractured and dead afterwards. The defendant was convicted for murder, however, the court quashed and convicted of manslaughter substituted. In this case, the court of appeal upheld that there was a substantial risk, which the child could suffer from serious bodily harm. Substantial risk means the act of the defendant made a strong and significant cause to the death of the victim. The judge directed the jury that the consequence of the act is foreseeable by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2010). Criminal Law Today: An introduction with…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case set forth the precedent that juries, not the judge, will have the ability to exercise their discretion when deciding aggravating factors which could lead to the enforcement of the death…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, it is the job of the prosecution to then establish whether she also has the mens rea for her Victims’ murder. The mens rea for murder is the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. There are two types of intention: direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention as defined by James LJ in Mohan6 is the “decision” to bring about a “particular consequence” no matter whether the Defendant “desired that consequence or not”. In the words of R.A. Duff7 direct intent can be construed from the Defendant’s actions if the Defendant would consider himself a “failure” if the “relevant consequence” did not occur. Lydia stated that she had no “malice” whatsoever to Danielle or Gemma and only intended to scare Jasmine. By applying Mohan8 it is clear that Lydia did not make the decision to throw the law reports in order to kill Danielle and would not consider herself to have failed if her actions did not cause the death of Danielle. Therefore, Lydia did not display direct intent to kill Danielle and whether or not Lydia displayed oblique intent must be explored. The cases of R v Maloney9 and Hancock and Shankland10 provided some confusion on what degree of foresight was required for a jury to infer intention from a Defendant’s actions. In Nedrick11 it was established that the jury should ask how “probable” the consequences from the Defendant’s voluntary act were and if…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We must look to the outward expression of a person as manifesting his intention rather than to his secret and unexpressed intention. ‘The law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts.'” Lucy, 196 Va. at 521.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shaw v Thomas [2010] NSWCA 169 involved a 10-year-old child being injured by falling off a bunk bed when staying at a friend’s house. The risk was defined as the respondent ‘falling and injuring himself whilst descending from the top bunk of the bed in question’: at [45]. It was held that no reference should be made to the relevant Australian Standards in respect of bunk beds or a publication by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that referred to evidence of bunk bed injuries to children, when assessing whether the risk was not insignificant as the appellants had no knowledge of such. At [46] Macfarlan JA stated that whether the risk was not insignificant ‘was to be determined by reference to the circumstances of which reasonable people in the position of the appellants would have been aware’.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    You don’t have to have intention to harm or hurt but the intention to complete action…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Unit 03 Aqa

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * Morrissons (1989): level of intention is lower when the defendant is trying to resist/prevent an arrest/detention…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 outline

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    c. Specific intent- the thoughtful and conscious intention to perform a specific act in order to achieve a particular crime…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Despite recent reforms on the law of murder and voluntary manslaughter; including the special defence of diminished responsibility and loss of control, there are still inconsistencies present making the law unsatisfactory. This area of the law is in ‘dire need of reform’; as pointed out by the Law Commission in their 2006 report; Murder, Manslaughter and infanticide. The report stated how ‘The Law governing homicide in England and Wales is a rickety structure built upon shaky foundations.’…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The accused intended to commit the crime, knowing their actions were wrong (guilty mind). Three types of mens rea:…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aware of this crime be interpreted as an intentional while doing a misconduct. Note that in criminal law, criminal consciousness is completely separated from the intent, motive of the suspects. The deliberate criminal prosecution easily prove if the suspect knows his behavior will be dangerous but still do it. When considering factors intentionally committing a crime, the court must consider the West suspects more aspects when action really "want" specific consequences or not. For example, in the murder, the "want" or "do not want" deaths can switch from willful murder (death) to manslaughter (in prison). This is a very difficult field to prove and…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law Criminal Courts

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It has been shown, therefore that Jonas attacker, depending on the extent of his crime could face imprisonment from six months up to life, under the Offence Against the Persons Act (1861).The Act is 152 years old, the non Fatal offences contained within it use archaic language and words of which modern understanding of them has changed since it was passed, such as assault and battery. The structure of the offences can also be criticised. There is no statutory definition of assault or battery and there are no clear boundaries between the offences which Jonas attacker could have committed. Similarly there is no clear boundary between ABH and GBH it is for the jury to decide what amounts to really serious harm and different juries will differ in their opinions. Non-fatal offences is an area of the law that has attracted much criticism and it is unanimously accepted that it is in need of reform. This could avoid absurd decisions within the courtroom, endless appeals and unjustified sentencing. In order for both Jonas and his attacker to have a fair trail, changes are necessary.…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Intent is when a individual has sufficient mens rea ( mental state) to commit a crime with a aim or purpose. Intent is the state of ones mind at the time then followed by action.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the second scenario where Glinda asked Dorothy to borrow her bow then climbs up a tree. While Glinda was up in the tree she decides to try to shoot and injure or even kill Zelena. The arrow ended up missing Zelena but it struck Elpha and killed her. After that happened Glinda climbed down from the tree and ran off with Dorothy. While running, Glinda decided to tell Dorothy what happened, Dorothy decided to let Glinda stay at her house and hide form the police. When the three elements of crime the criminal act, intent and concurrence. As I posted in the early scenario, “One requirement of criminal act is that the defendant perform it voluntarily.” Glinda intentionally climbed up that tree to shoot an arrow at Zelena to either hurt or kill…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An interesting case that was currently brought before the Supreme Court was Missouri vs. Frye. I found this case interesting due to the injustice that was provided by Frye’s counsel, and that Frye insisted on committing the same crime over and over again even though he knew he had an open case concerning driving under a suspended license. There were many sources and jurisdictions related to criminal law that also relates to this case. Criminal liability is when one takes responsibility for committing a crime, and accomplice liability is when someone helps someone commit a crime. Actus reus means guilty act, mens rea means guilty mind, and concurrence means the equality of rights. Actus reus and mens rea are both necessary in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays