Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Philippines Judiciary System

Good Essays
857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Philippines Judiciary System
THE JUDICIARY

Government has created legal machinery that operates within the concept of "justice under law”. This legal instrumentality is a system of courts, or the judiciary, which applies the law for the settlement of disputes.

Justice under the Law:
Those who are authorized to enforce the law must treat people fairly and equally by showing respect for the rule of the law. Only by applying the law equally to all – rich or poor, high or low – can it be said that those in power gain legitimacy and acceptance from those people over whom they rule.

The Judiciary Defined:
Judiciary is the branch of government which interprets the laws of the state and upon which devolves the application of the law for the settlement of conflicts arising from the relations between persons and between government and the persons.
In a democratic society, the judiciary is the bulwark of individual liberties and freedoms and the guardian of the Constitution.

The Concept of Judicial Independence:
This means that the judges are independent in rendering impartial decisions, completely free from executive and legislative control, pressure and influence from any person, individuals or groups.
The concept of judicial independence demands that an independent judiciary must be the “cornerstone of democracy” and the bulwark of freedom.
The independence of the judiciary is protected by the Constitution of the state.

The Judiciary as Enforcer of the Bill of Rights:
The Constitution provides all the protection the judiciary needs to assert its independence from the executive, legislature, other government institutions, persons and private entities.
The judiciary should enforce the Bill of Rights in deciding against acts of the executive or the legislature, or of any person or group that deny the citizens the blessings of liberty and justice.

Organization of the Judiciary:
The organization of the judiciary is important in the light of such goal of creating a judicial structure that will be convenient to litigants and that will attain expertise and certainty in the application of the law on certain particular cases brought before the judicial tribunal. Division of Courts: 1. Courts at the base of the Judicial Structure – inferior courts whose function is to try and render judgment on cases pertaining to petty crimes and petty civil disputes. 2. Courts of General Jurisdiction – higher level of courts whose function is to try persons accused of high crimes or felonies and hear important civil cases. 3. Intermediate Appellate Courts – which are between the trial courts/courts of general jurisdiction and the Supreme Court. An Appellate Court is one to which a case is decided by the trial court may be brought for an appeal. 4. Supreme Court – whose decision is final on all cases brought before it by appeal or review from the lower courts.

The Functions of the Judiciary:
The general function of the judiciary is to apply the law with as much certainty and uniformity to certain specified cases. 1. Settlement of Disputes – disputes between persons and decide which of the two parties has the right under the law. 2. Prevention of Wrongful Acts – prevents the commission of wrongful acts by equity. 3. Issuance of Declaratory Judgments – enables the court to enter a final judgment between litigants in an actual controversy in which the judges defines their respective rights under a statutes, will, contract, or other document, but it does not grant “consequential or coercive relief”. 4. The Exercise of Judicial Review – the power of the judiciary particularly of the Supreme Court to review an act of the legislature, or that of the executive and compare it with the Constitution 5. Performance of Quasi-Judicial Functions – function is to naturalize aliens, granting license, the appointments of guardians to minor orphans, and administrators to property and receivers in bankruptcy.

Qualifications and Tenure of Office:
Judges must be impartial and honest, must be given independence and security of tenure, and are expected to be competent or learned in the law.

Two Basic Methods of Selection: 1. Appointment – the president shall appoint a member of the Supreme Court or judge of the lower court from a list of at least three nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council for each vacancy. 2. Election – judges are elected by the two houses of the federal legislature and are allowed to seek re-election which to good judges may turn out to be a permanent tenure

Qualifications:
Most important requirements for making the judiciary strongly independent, professional and competent to carry out its vital function is the qualification of judges. * Life background * Experience * Education * Training

Tenure of Office:
Security of tenure is very essential to maintaining the independence of the judicial department.
As a safeguard to the independence of the courts, security of tenure of judges is guaranteed by the Constitution of the state by providing certain measures against removal of judges without due cause.

The Role of an Impartial Judge:
He is solely responsible in directing and controlling the trial of the case. He must be convinced that in the presentation of evidence all facts pertinent to the case are discovered. If lacking in essential facts, the judge has the right to question witnesses.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Independence Within a Political Process. Our judicial branch of government was designed not only to serve as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches but also to be the final arbiter on disputes among states and between the states and the federal government. One important arbitration tool utilized by the judicial branch is judicial review. Judicial review is one of the U.S. Constitution’s most provocative features as it plays an important role in shaping the laws that impact our society. For this discussion, complete the following:…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Independence Within a Political Process. Our judicial branch of government was designed not only to serve as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches but also to be the final arbiter on disputes among states and between the states and the federal government. One important arbitration tool utilized by the judicial branch is judicial review. Judicial review is one of the U.S. Constitution’s most provocative features as it plays an important role in shaping the laws that impact our society. For this discussion, complete the following:…

    • 55625 Words
    • 161 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination of the partisan politics, political sponsorship as well as the influence of money when compared to the method that is currently in use.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judiciary is the body that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state, they operate under the separation of powers, they do not make laws nor enforce laws but rather they interpret the law and help in its application.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most intriguing element of the Constitution of the United States is the Independent Judiciary, in which judicial power for the country lies in the federal courts and operates separately from the legislative and executive branches. This institution allows for the civil settlement of conflicts and enables the fair application of the law to cases. Judicial independence ensures that federal judges aren’t punished for their decisions related to court cases and aren’t inhibited by political figures in their interpretation of the law. This tenet of the Constitution is the foundation for the generalized success and transparency of our standing judicial system and is why it has been the model for numerous systems across the globe. James Madison’s Federalist Number 51 is a fundamental interpretation of the concept of judicial independence delineated in the Constitution.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges of the supreme Court.” The Legislative was a check on Executive rights such as making treaties and appointing judicial officers. Therefore, the power of the government was divided, restrained, balanced and checked by itself and especially by the Congress, which provided security to individual’s…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    205 BillOfRights

    • 386 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Constitution and the Bill of Rights protect individuals, but also give the government the power to pass laws to restrict behavior. Legislation, the Bill of Rights, court decisions, and the amendment process work together to both safeguard individual rights and limit them as deemed appropriate to protect the rights to safety and security for all. When people bring a case to the courts, judges can decide whether or not the Constitution allows a law that restricts the rights of individuals.…

    • 386 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. The term “judiciary is also used to refer collectively to the personnel, such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators, who form the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as a “bench”), as well as the staffs who keep the system running smoothly. In 1803, Marbury vs Madison case reviewed in the Supreme Court confirmed the legal principle of judicial review demonstrating the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Judicial Branch is the most important branch of the United States government, due to the significant role it plays in interpreting and determining if laws are constitutional. Even though the Judicial Branch is the smallest in size and has smallest budget of any branch in our nation’s government, it exercises enormous power and is equal to other branches of the government because it has the power of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is the review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through the concept of checks and balances the government is both constrained and entrusted. The rights of individuals are honored through laws enacted by the legislative branch and through the legislatives branches ability to set up court systems at the state and federal level. The president can veto a bill if he presumes. The judiciary branch interprets and has the ability to overturn both state and federal law. With each branch acting separately but equally both our laws and the rights of each individual is preserved.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch is established under Article III of the Constitution. It was created to be the weakest of all three branches of government. Each branch has its own characteristics, but what distinguishes this branch from other two is that Judiciary is passive. It cannot act until someone brings case in front of them. Even if some law or act is unconstitutional, courts are powerless to do anything on their own. Contrary to Judiciary, other two branches are active, and have power to attack other subjects.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first branch is the Judicial Branch also known as the court system. The Judicial branch is in place to supply the people with true merits and qualities of laws. There are a number of powers that the judicial branch is liable for such as trying and convicting offenders of the law which includes associates of parliament. Another part of the judicial organization is to understand bylaws and how they relate to the latest state of affairs while also determining the validity to the Constitution. With the previous statement in mind, the judicial branch can also upend a ruling or law if it is found to be in disagreement of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In American Constitutional thought, it is generally regarded that the Judicial Branch and the courts should be independent from political sway. The Legislative and Executive branches were designed to represent the will of the people at the time, but the third branch is to remain isolated. Blatantly activist judges are generally regarded as unacceptable. It’s undeniable, however, that a completely independent judiciary is impossible in a democratic society. To some extent, the general populace plays a role in interpreting Constitutions, which is referred to as popular constitutionalism. To what extent the general populace plays in the interpretation of the Constitution is still debated and the answer may vary from country to country. For this…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays