Chapter eight gives a good overview of the models presented in chapters nine, ten, and eleven. The way Entwistle presented five models which he called: “Enemies, Spies, Colonialists, Neutral, and Allies” (2016, p. 135). These five models are formed based on the variety of views that people hold about psychology and theology. Because people hold a variety of orientations in these two fields it creates many combinations of integration. The Enemy model is the view that psychology and theology cannot work together. The Spies model uses which ever orientation is most effective in the moment to promote the individual well-being, which means they are not committed to any certain belief system. Colonialists are strongly influenced by their commitment…
Many of the clergy practiced the giving of alms, for this type of behavior was encouraged by the Bible. During the 15th century, priests would preach on giving to the poor and a good deed during one’s life. But if the money is given after death it isn’t as valued. (d-1) Many people felt sorry for the poor people and raised money for shelters to let them reside in. Some people portrayed those who gave to the poor as “good Samarians” such as in Rembrandt’s painting “Alms at the Poor House”, where the man giving the money has an injured arm but is still giving happily to the family of poor peasants. (d-9) Vincent de paul, another Catholic priest, rebuked people who were all talk and no action. He said that to truly alleviate the situation of the needy, one must not only tell them about the Lord, but they must help them out by giving money. Most of the clergy believed that the poor should be helped no matter what their situation was or why they were in that situation.…
In the late 1400's, the poor were regarded with sympathy and compassion; generous aid from both public and religious institutions was common. By the 16th Century, however, the poor were treated with suspicion and harsh measures, to ensure that they were not becoming lazy, using welfare as a substitute for labor. Beginning in the 17th Century, the attitudes toward the poor again shifted, returning to more sympathetic views and responses, though many members of the upper-class still retained the negative outlook on the destitute of the 16th Century.…
There seems to be an inexhaustible number of reasons that one person might go out of his way to assist another. One of the more interesting of these is to give to soothe one's conscience, or to avoid the guilt that comes with not offering help when you can. Ma Joad used this reason to feed the starving children at the first Hooverville they stayed at. She looked at those kids and tried to avoid giving them food so she could feed her family. Even Uncle Tom had a hard time eating his food with those hungry children looking on. Ma eventually soothed her conscience by giving the kids the dregs of the soup kettle, though she knew she should have given the entire helping to her family, as they had less than enough themselves.…
“Our intent with The rich and the rest of us is to make [people] think about the pervasiveness of poverty, its real causation, and the threat it poses to our democracy. We want to raise awareness about poverty and discuss how best to end it- in out lifetime. “(Excerpted from the introduction, page 10-11)…
I like many people believe that the people of wealthy nations have a moral responsibility to help poor nations. When I was doing some research on this subject, I learned some people have said that all people have a moral responsibility to help people in harm’s way and when doing so would not cause harm to them. And as a person I do know that suffering and death from starvation are both considered harmful things. I do also see that it is very clear that small financial sacrifices on the part of people from wealthy nations can prevent massive amounts of suffering and death from starvation just by helping in small ways. So from my point of view and research I do now believe that people in a wealthy nation have at least some moral responsibility to help poor nations. I also see that Singers argument does add up with my research so I do agree with Singers argument as well.…
However, religious believers themselves shouldn’t just be the only ones who should show more compassion. In order to help the poor, everyone in the world should help in different ways (e.g. donating to charity). God has given us free will, so it’s the religious believers’ choice if he or she wants to show more compassion to the poor or not. The religious believer may also be in a difficult position themselves where they are unable to contribute to helping the poor.…
* From an economic standpoint, do you feel all members of society have a special obligation to the poor and weak?…
In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, they more they did for themselves, and became richer.” Many people think he is against the poor and wants them gone. However if you take a look and read carefully you can see he wants to have them raised and out of poverty. His way may be different from most people however he wants them to help them still as he states the “The best way of doing good for the poor is not making them easy in poverty ,but leading or driving them out.” This shows us that he wants to get them out or free them from the captivity of poverty…
The lower class and outcasts addressed the upper class with deference due to wealth and power, but the rich didn’t address the needy with deference, instead they saw them as inferior since they were subordinate. Jesus however, did not view this as acceptable to society, so he aided the poor and the outcasts and viewed them as equal, to break down social barriers. For example, a Samaritan woman came to draw water at a well in Sychar, when Jesus approached her asking for a drink of water, “When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, ‘Will you give me a drink?’” (John 4:7). This was uncommon in Jesus’s time since Jews were not allowed to associate with Samaritans since, “In 2 Kings 17:23-34, we are told that the Jews never came back to Samaria” (What’s Wrong With…
I agree with the comment that Peter Singer’s argument that individuals should donate to alleviate poverty and save lives does not address the underlying structural socioeconomic causes of poverty. His argument for a redistribution of wealth on an individual basis still operates under an economic system where there is an unequal distribution of wealth. As a result, even if individuals donate money, poorer countries will always be reliant on these wealthier countries and individuals for survival resulting in an increased power imbalance. However, I also think that it is important not to disregard these contributions to people in poverty simply because they do not fix the system, as these contributions do have the power to save and improve lives…
After reading “When Handouts Keep Coming, The Food Line Never Ends”, it got me thinking why this article was even written. Everyone knows about poverty and people going hungry at Thanksgiving time. Everywhere you go in the month of November you see the salvation army collecting money, different work places and schools having food drives, homeless shelters and soup kitchens offering meals, as well as churches taking extra donations to help local families in need. The main idea in this article is to end poverty, if we ended poverty then naturally it would end the hunger cause. This whole article talked about food distribution centers, food bank trucks and raising money for the food to help spread amongst the people who needed it, but is this really ending poverty? Or by this generous, good hearted help, is it letting people continue living in poverty because it’s easier taking what’s being handed to you then to get out there and work hard to get out of poverty? In this article I think the main points are to get awareness out about how much poverty is out there in the world, and what is already being done about it. To let people know about the food distribution centers, food banking culture, food bank trucks, food insecurity and poverty. I have mixed emotions about this article, and maybe it’s because I don’t fully understand what it is like to be in poverty. I don’t understand how in the United States we have as much poverty as we do. How with all the technology that we have, free libraries with books and internet capability, such generous people giving food to the homeless why people who are in poverty can’t get out of it. If I were in their shoes I would be working hard to get my GED or getting myself cleaned up to get a job to make a life for myself. So these people living in poverty are they really stuck in poverty or is it easy for them? Easy to do not work and live on the streets or in shelters and taking free food. On the other hand it does warm my heart…
In my current role at Palm Beach Count Food Bank, I have the opportunity to feed people in need. I would love to continue to volunteer on a regular basis, because it changes me, and me perspective. We tend to think of what is not going right in our lives, but when we are intentional about putting others first, a thankful heart starts to develop. For that reason, I think it is crucial to be selfless and focus on the needs of others. I am not saying to neglect one’s needs of family, but to take time to acknowledge all the blessings the Lord has given to us in order to bless others. “God is not unjust; he will not forget your work and the love you have shown him as you have helped his people and continue to help them.” (Hebrews 6:10,…
For some people they have the best life and get everything they need and want for themselves. For some people on the other hand they don't have it that way and get the short end of the stick. For the people you see and help It comes straight from the heart because they don't have it easy and from me to them I realize that by helping them just a little it could jumpstart them to a fresh life and show them we care. I realize that I have as much as I need and I always ask my parents for money and to go out places but some people don't even have homes or food to provide and eat. By helping out a needing hand it makes me realize that I don't need everything in the world and it should help other people realize to that by looking at the life you have if you're rich or wealthy to help someone in need is the right thing to do and what I like doing best.…
My interpretation of “people helping people” is “people helping people” can be looked at as a selfless act of encouragement to one individual or a whole community. By helping those with a certain need to only get the profit of satisfaction is a fundamental philosophy to keep our society well-endowed and strong as a community. I have personally demonstrated this in my community by participating in my school’s Operation Christmas Child to help children across the world see what a better life is and to help them reach it on earth, and with God. I also volunteered for four summers at our City’s Park’s Program as a junior counselor, watching children and giving them a place to enjoy their summer outside and also educate them as we took field trips to the Corning Museum of Glass. I personally have lived by my own interpretation of the selfless philosophy of “people helping people”…