Preview

The Power Of The Watergate Scandal

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Power Of The Watergate Scandal
Power -- We the United States of America give our people the power to make a difference and choose what they feel to be right. As Americans we put our faith and trust into the leaders we elect to vouch and advocate for us, but the real question is how much faith and trust do we have in these individuals to make the correct choices for we the people? On June 17, 1972 the faith and trust placed into President Nixon hands was abruptly taken away from him after the news of the Watergate Scandal that he was directly intertwined in.
Watergate came to be known as the greatest political scandal in United States history to date. It was not only a huge disappointment to the American people and the individuals who placed their faith and trust in him
…show more content…
Four of the men arrested the night of the burglary plead guilty along with Howard Hunt. James McCord and Gordon Liddy were convicted of conspiracy, burglary, and illegal wiretapping. Political espionage was next on the list of thing the Senate was going to investigate. The involvement the White House had in the Watergate Scandal did not become evident until James McCord wrote a letter to Judge Sirica. His letter to the Judge went into great detail explaining the depths of the Watergate Scandal.
Alexander Butterfield, a former White House official, testified in July 1973 that Nixon had taped conversations in his office. Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox immediately subpoenaed the tape and Nixon refused to release them. Judge Sirica asked Nixon to let him hear the tapes. Nixon appealed the order, arguing that a president was excused from judicial orders enforcing subpoenas due to executive
…show more content…
court of appeals upheld Sirica's decision, but Nixon then came up with the idea that Senator John Stennis could listen to the tapes and verify an edited version. Archibald Cox, first special prosecutor, rejected this plan and Nixon ordered that he make no further attempts to obtain the tapes. On October 20, Nixon dismissed both Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus and Cox. This "Saturday night massacre" triggered serious moves to impeach Nixon. Nixon then agreed to give the tapes to Sirica and he appointed a new Judge named Leon Jaworski.
While reviewing the subpoenaed tapes, one of them contained an eighteen minute gap. White House officials and Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, gave confusing testimony on how the gap might have occurred. Six court appointed electronics experts said that at least five separate erasures had caused the gap. Many people started to assume that someone had purposely destroyed certain parts of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The stage was set for a great constitutional struggle between a President determined not to give up executive documents and materials and a Senate committee and a federal prosecutor who are determined to get them," The White House claimed “Executive Privilege” when they refused to disclose the recorded tapes of President Nixon and his aides. Nixon and his advisors became arrogant with their possession of power. The Executive Branch was disrupting the balance of power and the separation of powers written into the Constitution. No Branch, elected official, governmental worker, or even the President is above the law, but Nixon definitely…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He, along with the rest of the hired intruders, was caught in the act by security guards. Their mission was to install eavesdropping equipment in the chambers and to retrieve secret democratic files, so the president would know the Democrats’ secret plans. It was later confirmed that Nixon, along with most of his administration, was involved in the scandal. Nixon and his administration violated the constitution in two different ways. They violated the constitution by committing perjury and by obstructing justice. Nixon and his administration committed perjury b denying their involvement with the scandal. They obstructed justice by bribing individuals to remain silent towards the Scandal and by editing and erasing information off of the audio tapes. These audio tapes were key evidence that would have allowed the case to have been solved…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Key Players: Richard Nixon was the most important key player since the case was against him. Nearly half of the Justices involved in prosecuting Nixon were appointed by him during his term of Presidency. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger was also appointed by Nixon and later wrote the unanimous opinion which stated Nixon must turn over the tapes. James D. St. Clair was Nixon’s counsel. Archibald Cox was a key player in the beginning but Nixon later fired him and the appointed Leon Jaworski as the new special prosecutor in the case. Jaworski then issued the subpoena which ordered Nixon to turn the tapes over. Chief Judge John Sirica of the U.S. District Court for Washington D.C. approved the subpoena. Associate Justice William Rehnquist, a Nixon appointee, recused himself as he had a prior association with the Nixon…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the time of when the Watergate Scandal happened, the people of the United States were already suspicious of the government's activity. The Watergate Scandal only proved to accelerate the government's dropping reputation with the public. Watergate was a big deal so that it basically showed the American people that they could no longer trust anything the President had told them. Nixon's crimes weren't the highlight of the scandal, just that the government was fooling people in the first place. Though, when the republican president covers up the fact that some of his people broke into a building of the rival Democratic Party in an attempt to find information which would give them some sort of advantage in the next election, don't you think…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us. V. Nixon Court Case

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The start of the 1970s was a period of inclining distrust in the National Government. The Pentagon Papers revealed the government’s purposeful deception of the actions undergoing in Vietnam and the American people realized that they’d been deceived. Americans were in shock when the National Guard engaged in opened fire at the scene of a Kent State University protest resulting from President Nixon's authorization for the United States to attack Cambodia. A total of four students were killed in the process. Nixon then attempted to cover up illegal actions by himself and his administration which further angered the American people. In June 1972, five men sporting cameras and bugging equipment were charged with arrest within the Democratic National Committee's offices in the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. Soon after the authorities discovered that the burglars were employed, directly or indirectly, for the Committee to Re-Elect the President. President Nixon and heads of his campaign denied any and all connections with the incident. The five men were then convicted of burglary, including E. Howard Hunt, Jr., a former Nixon aide, and G. Gordon Liddy, a lawyer purposed for the Committee to Re-elect the President. Shortly after the incident, the presiding judge received a letter written by…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard Nixon was the 37th United States Republican president who the only commander-in-chief to resign from his position, after the 1970s Watergate scandal. The conflict between the two major parties back then worse probably at its worse. On June 16, 1972, a break-in attempt at the Watergate Hotel by Nixon supporters was made in order to strengthen their political party and to discredit the stance of Democratic Parties. The events leading up to this break in were persecution, rumor and tainted publicity and break-ins. The most damaging events following the break in was Richard Nixon’s attempt to covering the botched crime.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Nixon was willing to do anything to extend his term in the upcoming presidential election. Here I will describe how, when, who, and the motives of the watergate scandal. I will discuss the watergate break-in, the saturday night massacre, president Nixon, His reasoning, and President ford granting Nixon Pardon. The Watergate scandal was a planned theiving of of official documents and wire tapping of phones in the watergate building. My main purpose for choosing this topic is to clarify the watergate scandal.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    his back (BJU 556). Eventually, the Supreme Court ruled that Nixon had to release the tapes. It…

    • 831 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On May 28, 1972, a group of men working at the White House, including G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt, who both were part of the Committee for the Re-Election of the president (CRP), met at the Watergate hotel in Washington, D.C., with the plan to bug the phones of several DNC officials (Balis & Levy…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9. Who was Howard Hunt? He was on of the people involved in organizing the Watergate break in.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    He was being investigated by a special prosecutor, Archibald Cox. A special prosecutor is a lawyer that is designed specifically to handle cases where the person who they are prosecuting is very far above a regular lawyer in the case of power. During an event known as the “Saturday Night Massacre” Nixon appointed his secretary of defense, Elliot Richardson, to fire Cox. Richardson declined the job and resigned from his position in Nixon’s cabinet. Nixon appointed the acting head of the Justice Department to fire Archibald and to America’s dismay, he did.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of US V. Nixon

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Then, during the trial, President Nixon wanted to use his “executive privilege.” This means that he cannot give away information from other government branches to preserve confidential communications. This is for the security for the national interest within the executive branch. There was a group of five burglaries that were found and arrested for trying to break into the Watergate office to replace the malfunctioned wiretap. They, were not immediately connected to Nixon and, Nixon swore that none of his white house staff was not involved in the Watergate break-in.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a series of stunning testimony`s current and former White House aides admitted that criminal behavior was rampant in the administration, and potentially reached the very top of the administration, the President himself. In testimony give by White House aide Alexander Butterfield the nation was stunned to find out that President Nixon had secretly recorded Oval office conversations. This led to the special prosecutor and the Senate investigation…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This evidence suggested a link between the burglars and someone close to the President and thus sparked the investigation that led to the unraveling of the Watergate scandal ( (http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/).” In the famous Watergate scandal the five men wiretapped and stole documents from the offices of Robert Spencer Oliver and Larry…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Vs Nixon

    • 596 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The election for 1972 was approaching quickly and the republicans were interested to find out that the Democratic party’s strategy was. They hired 5 “plumbers” to sneak into the Democratic party’s national headquarters to wire and bug the watergate building. The plumbers were fixed with bugs and were all prepared to tap the building. The first run was a successful wire and tap, however when they got back to the White House, the recording devices were defective and unsuccessful. Nixon had no idea what happened and when he found out, he was trying to cover up the scandal. While Nixon was in office, had installed a recording system that recorded all the conversations that he had in the oval office. Some people argued that the evidence was on the recorded tapes that Nixon had. The case started off in the the US district court on August 29, 1973, the decision was that Nixon had to turn over the tapes. Nixon releases edited versions of the tapes of a few of the tapes. The case goes back to the US district court and they decide again that he has to turn over unedited versions of all of the tapes. Nixon then appeals and the case makes it’s way to the Supreme Court!…

    • 596 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays