Her argument is sound because she discusses the problems then logically explains how vertical farms can help, instead of just saying they will help. Her explanations are easy to follow and make sense to the reader, so it becomes difficult to disagree with her argument. She does, however, in the beginning of her article, say that vertical farms can reduce costs and are more economical, but later explains that one of the challenges vertical farms face is high costs. The cost after the produce is grown and the cost of running the vertical farms are different, so Flynn is not contradicting herself necessarily, but she does not thoroughly explain this difference, making it slightly
Her argument is sound because she discusses the problems then logically explains how vertical farms can help, instead of just saying they will help. Her explanations are easy to follow and make sense to the reader, so it becomes difficult to disagree with her argument. She does, however, in the beginning of her article, say that vertical farms can reduce costs and are more economical, but later explains that one of the challenges vertical farms face is high costs. The cost after the produce is grown and the cost of running the vertical farms are different, so Flynn is not contradicting herself necessarily, but she does not thoroughly explain this difference, making it slightly