Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Screening

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Screening
Amy and Kif have decided they want to bring a child into this world. Having a child changes a couple lives forever. They have to think of someone else needs before their own. Having a child can be scary because you cannot predict anything about him or her. So when Amy and Kif heard about genetic screening they thought it was a wonderful idea. They are in interested in the idea of eugenics. Eugenics is selective breeding for the best people possible. Why not pick the exact traits of your baby? Sounds like a great idea to people that have not done their research about this topic. With the use of modern technology, doctors can do this with genetic screening. Couples should not be able to use genetic screening should not be allowed because of how it will affect society as a whole.
People can genetically change their children in the womb. Parents will pick traits that they believe will be best for their children. People will pick traits that will make their children the best people possible. Parents will make their children be smart, kind, respectful, attractive looking and honest are just some of the many examples
…show more content…
One of the arguments that bioconservation puts out there with the idea of eugenics is that the idea of it is wrong. They see bio-enhancements are wrong and people should not mess with them. They focus on four different arguments that are against the idea of eugenics.
One of the bioconservation arguments focuses is on the idea of unpredictable results. You could ask for your kid to be born with blue eyes but when the baby is born it has brown eyes. Sometimes even when you select the correct genes of the person sometimes things do not work out. The genetics sometimes take over and override what you expected to happen. Also, sometimes the person that selected the genes could have selected the wrong set of genes and that could change the results you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    no side in the argument. Genetic manipulation is supposed to be the baby maker of the future by…

    • 529 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 4 M1 and D1

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the infancy stage nature could be seen as responsible for the developing of the child. The chromosomes from both the male and the women would determine the child’s physical features. It would determine their eyes, hair colour, and facial features e.c.t Cherly would have inherited 23 chromosomes from her mum, and 23 chromosomes from her dad. This means she would have a mixture of both of the parent’s aspects. This would have affected her physically because she would look like both of her parents. It is said that the smarter the parents, the smarter the child will be due to genes. However this could be down to nurture. If the child has very supportive parents and attentive parents when it comes to learning (nurture) then it might have an effect. For example, if the parents were to sit and interact with the child, it would get their brains thinking logically. Also, if the parents were taking the child to play group, he would be influenced by the other children to be active and develop new skills. It would also help the child socially because they are learning to interact with the other children. It would build confidence and self-esteem. Although, even before starting playgroup the child could be very sociable. E.g. not minding to go to strangers. This would be seen as a genetic factor as the child hasn’t had a chance to learn how to be sociable yet. Consequently, if a child’s parent was not a very sociable person and was very withdrawn from people, the child might imitate the actions from his/hers role model and act the same. The influence from a child’s role models can determine how well…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gattaca Movie Analysis

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The geneticists mentioned that he is trying to give the parents the”best possible start” and that the child will be the “best of you.” I think people are misunderstanding that the child is the best of you, but not the best human being, because we are not perfect. Imperfection is what makes human unique. This shows that the genetic traits are the potential guides or the “start” of life, but people can still change due to their living environment. Sometimes I think gaining too much control of things makes it too complicated and it is better to leave it to nature and chance, just like how the parents in the film wanted some traits to be…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    . Sandel illustrates his unease with genetic enhancement by refuting arguments people have previously used to oppose genetic enhancement. All while telling us why such arguments were not successful, and redirecting our attention to the real dilemma. Sandel feels that the common arguments society makes against generic enhancement are not sufficient to portray the entire ethical problem and on top of that the arguments are flawed themselves. Arguments such as violation of autonomy, fairness, gap of economic classes, competition to perfection, and Nazi eugenics are not sufficient to express the moral unease that embodies the act of generic…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comfort Zone Analysis

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The way people behave can not be genetically determined, right?! Nature and nurture are the movers and shapers, they make us what we are today, according to Harris, J. (1998)2 . Nature versus nurture is a much discussed topic, in psychology as well. There are a lot of theories about the question if we were formed by our genes or the environment where we live. Some psychologists argue that only one side has their impact like John Locke from the nature-side, while I believe it is an interaction between two of these factors, both of them have their influence on the development of that type of…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Genetics affect who you will grow to be in many ways. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is the language of life that is within every living thing, genetic instructions that form what we will become. There is still much of the language that scientists don’t understand, but after extensive research scientists have found that certain gene codes actually relate to increased chances of developing a cancer or disease. We only have to look at family medical histories to know that is true, some diseases are clearly more common in families than in unrelated people. But whether a genetic predisposition actually makes a person ill depends on the interaction between genes and the environment. For example you are much more likely to develop lung cancer within your lifetime if your parents/grandparents have had it; it is likely that you have been handed down a gene that increases your risk of developing it. However if you smoke regularly and do little exercise then you are putting yourself at an increased risk of developing it sooner and more rapidly. Genetics also affect our appearances, body shape and how tall we can become. Half our chromosomes come from our mother and the other from our father. Our appearances tend to more or less a mix of our mother and fathers however some of our attributes of appearance may be similar to our grandparents. As genes can sometimes seemingly ‘miss a generation’ but the genes are still passed down just not aesthetically visible. Our genes also affect the timing of when puberty occurs, but environmental factors such as nutrition also have an effect.…

    • 3063 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper wills discuss Leon Kass’s conclusion that reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos is unethical. It will also converse the steps in Kass 's argument for his conclusion and will talk about the strengths and weaknesses of this argument?…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How much of genetic information can the parents or relatives access raises a concern that it might result in an excessive use of reprogenetics. Furthermore, if scientists allow DNA screening for parents to avoid passing genetic diseases to their children, that might lead to more designer babies. Human genetic engineering is new and current field that has its pros and cons. Therefore, we should be more concerned about setting up the limits of how much access the public and scientists can have on genetic information, and taking in consideration the ethical issues behind…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the essay, titled "Building Baby from the Genes Up?" Ronald M. Green proclaims his approval of genetic selection and extraction of human genes. He gives reasons that support his outlook on the matter, that this will be useful to civilization. Ronald M. Green is in violation of several ethical codes, with his view on genetic modification. I am against genetically modified humans, and I will explain to you, why this is my stance on the subject. First, I will summarize exactly what Ronald M. Green says in his article about his view on genetic modification and why practicing it is vital. Second, I will describe research involving human embryos and the disadvantages that genetic modification could possess for the future of human species by using research. Third, I will give you my viewpoint of why genetic modification is unethical and morally disturbing.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the test involves taking only a small blood sample, where a person’s DNA can be found, these tests have a minimal health risk. Genetic testing was initially used in pregnancies to test for diseases like Down's Syndrome and other genetic disorders (“What are the...”). However, thanks to more recent improvements, genetic testing has come to display several weaknesses and strengths. The genes that can be obtained from infants can notify parents of possible physical deficiencies, while others may show physical advantages (Stein).…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic testing, aka DNA testing, allows doctors to check if there are any possibilities to inherit diseases, and can also be used to determine a person's ancestry or biological relationship between people. It is important to understand the background and implications behind genetic testing as testing may be able to identify the odds of have of having a child with a genetic disease, but it can also result in miscarriage. The test often cannot determine if the child will show symptoms of a disease, how severe the symptoms will be, or whether the disease will progress over time. Another thing to take into consideration is the absence of treatment strategies…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Image Analysis

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For those parents who carry known diseases, genetic modification is a dream come true. No longer do they need to worry whether it would be ethical to conceive a child that may be sentenced to a lifetime of suffering, humiliation, or possibly premature death. They can choose to eliminate those genes and/or embryos that carry the disease. As a parent, I can truly sympathize with this incredibly heart wrenching decision.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article Is Gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics, John Harris discusses the concept of Eugenics when it comes to using Gene Therapy. Harris defines Eugenics as adapting to the production of “fine” offspring, or artificially producing offspring to fit certain criteria. He stresses on how this concept should be achieved. His main argument is that we should be in favor of Eugenics when it comes to potentially saving a child from living a potential disabled life. Harris believes that his view is not wrong, but believes that it is a matter of indifference whether we call it Eugenics or not. Harris argues that Gene Therapy is ethically sound, and using Eugenics can save lives. Harris notes problems when discussing the idea of using Eugenics. First, he notes that we do not fully understand the objective of producing “fine children.” Second, we do not understand the definition of “fine” and notes the difference between what an offspring can be, and what an offspring normally is. He poses a question where he argues what the difference between removing and repairing dysfunctions is, compared to using measures to enhance the functions of a potential offspring (Eugenics) He poses a second question where he asks if Gene Therapy in general is morally acceptable.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pregnancy Genetic Testing

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people have a negative outlook on prenatal genetic testing but that is because they are not educated on the goals and actual applications of the technology. They feel that the technology may be abused. One fear is that insurance companies may obtain genetic records and deny service based on those records. But there are laws to protect people from such discrimination. People also fear that the means for genetically altering fetuses will soon be available. This technology is a long ways away if it is even obtainable. The morality of genetic testing is also being questioned but everyone is different and you cannot dictate what is moral for everyone in a democracy. Some religious extremists fear and avoid any modern medicine at all.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will begin my argument by defining what is genetic engineering and what it means for something to be morally permissible. After contemplating how any one thing can be determined morally permissible by our entire society, I will move on to discuss the ideas of Kamm in his article about problems with enhancement. I will argue that although he may bring valid points to the table, the issues that he believes in are not the most important ones to be discussed. I will then proceed to argue that genetic engineering should only be used for medical purposes. Next, I will discuss the unfairness that genetic engineering would create and how our society may become divided.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays