Do you believe that gun-free zones are doing there job protecting us? Glenn Reynolds' article “Gun-free Zones Called Magnets for Mass Shooters," claims that gun-free zones are an open door for gunmans, and has an alternative solution. I comply with Lott’s stance that gun-free zones are an open invitations for shooters.…
Strict Gun Control (SGC) is defined as a “collection of legally authorized limitations designed to impose firearm shortage on the general residents” (Lance K). In the USA everyone has right to own anything or right to purchase whatever they want. In the same way people are purchasing the guns for different views. Some of them are purchasing to protect themselves and also they think that they have right to own it. Whereas, the others believe that they earn money by harming or blacking others. The best example is the death of an international student Sai Kiran Goud .On June 15, 2015 this 21 year male, doing his masters at the university in Miami was apparently waylaid by a group of suspected robbers. As he refused to give his iPhone he was killed…
As far as banning certain types of guns, that statement was made out of pure ignorance. Mills has written things like, “It is a moral outrage and national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” First off if you’re going to talk about guns, know a little something about them. There are people like Mills who want to ban “assault weapons” because they believe that they are uniquely dangerous firearms that are equal to the destruction of a machine gun. False! The assault weapons that are available to civilians are like another semi-automatic weapon, they fire one bullet with one pull of the trigger. They’re not stronger, faster or anything else, what sets them apart is the…
Opponents of concealed carry argue that increased gun ownership leads to more gun crime and unintended gun injuries. They contend that concealed handguns increase the chances of arguments becoming lethal, and that society would be safer with fewer guns on the street, not more. Dr. John Lott, published More Guns, Less Crime which concluded that the "shall-issue" laws linked with a reduction in violent crimes in 1988. Lott argued that if states that did not permit concealed handguns in 1992 had permitted them in 1977, 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and 12,000 robberies would have been prevented between 1977 and…
Over the past couple months, we have been hearing devastating news reports. School shootings, movie theater massacres, church shootings, there has been numerous reports of these tragic events. Many people believe that guns are the problem, but in reality it’s the people that need to think before they act. It’s true what they say, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” the more people with guns in the street, the safer it can be. There have been many states that have passed laws that let people openly carry guns, and Oregon is considering passing it as well. Oregon should allow law abiding citizens to carry guns openly. There have been many other states that has proven the open carry law works and is beneficial. Passing the open carry…
First, we certainly do not condone the violations of any laws. You may not like the laws, they may seem or actually be unfair on the face of it, and even stupid in some cases, but the law is the law, and violations of the law can cause you to lose your Concealed Carry Permit, possible forfeiture of your firearm, fines and/or prison sentences in some cases.…
As far as her stance on gun control, it has certainly become a heated topic of discussion. Stated by Hillary during the debate, “I think we need comprehensive background checks, need to close the online loophole, close the gun show loophole.” I agree with her wanting to regulate gun control, there are people out there who are a danger to others as well as themselves who would be better off without access to firearms. All of this can be accomplished and not violate the Second Amendment. I believe Hillary takes a good stance on this topic. I am an avid hunter and I certainly bear arms, but I know that there is a better way to regulate firearms in our country. According to an article by Newsweek, there are a number of advanced countries such as Australia, Germany, Finland, Italy, and France who would have made it much harder for some of the recent shooters to get their hands on firearms. This is information that we could learn from and adapt to make our own safer system which would be more appropriate in the modern world as opposed to when it was written in the…
When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…
Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…
The U.S. has been in a hot debate over a tough issue for hundreds of years now. The subject of that debate is gun control laws. With mass murders and break-ins happening all over America it brings up two groups of people. One group believes taking away the guns will solve the problem. I believe, along with lots of other people, that taking away the guns will not solve the problem. We need to protect our Second Amendment, as well as ourselves, and stick to our guns.…
Gun control is one of the most debatable topics in present day. Gun control refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. These firearms include handguns, machine guns, rifles etc. People use these weapons for multiple reasons. Some use it for sport, for example: hunting or practicing at the gun range. Others buy it for protection while others use it for violence. Having a firearm requires responsibility. The person that wields a gun is responsible for his safety or others. They are also responsible for using a weapon against someone. According to procon.org, ''The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and…
The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…
Do firearms encourage misconduct? Many Americans choose to believe they do. With gun control being a controversial topic throughout society, it has its consequences. Because gun violence has recently been a prevalent issue, gun control is at the forefront of political leaders’ decision making, however, gun control places law abiding citizens at a disadvantage.…
Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…
Lately it seems as though there is a stanch split in our county when it comes to the gun debate. One side views guns as the problem while the other views them as the solution. Many places including schools are designated gun free zones. Despite this designation we are all aware of the many campus shooting that have taken place within the last few years. I believe that college students, teacher and administrators should have the right to carry their legal firearms onto college campuses. It is my understanding that gun free zones create easy targets. Students, teachers and administrators have a better chance at saving their own lives and the lives of others when armed. I also believe that any campus…