In “shootings”, Adam Gopnik speaks about a shooting that took place in Virginia Tech Engineering building, and how the parents of the victims were told that it was not the right moment to ask questions. Gopnik also gives his points of view on how the shooting could have been avoided. Gopnik suggests that the main reason why these types of incidents keep happening in the United States is because there is a lack of security and requirements on who should not be able to buy a gun. The government should do what others countries are doing, and Gopnik’s example, is the massacre that happened in Paris Suborn of Nanterre in 2002, when a man killed eight people at a municipal meeting. Gun control became a key issue in the presidential…
Wilson presents convincing statistics to support his statements. He shows that only a fraction of the guns used by criminals are purchased at a gun shop. He points out that many would-be burglars are scared away because a home owner displayed or used a gun. He also presented statistics that disprove the assertion of gun control advocates that “the cost of self-defense is self injury: Handgun owners are more likely to shoot themselves or their loved ones than a criminal” (Barnet and Bedau 125). These statements are very true and should definitely be taken into consideration when dealing with gun…
American radio host and political commentator, Tammy Bruce, in her article, Why Gun Control Wont End Mass Murder, describes many statistics of gun violence. Bruce’s purpose is to make her readers aware of gun violence and the many factors contributing to it as well as how it is statistically unlikely that gun control will help. She adopts an aggressive tone in order to support those that agree with her. The main ideas expressed throughout this article are that politicians use shootings and gun violence for political gain and aren’t doing anything to stop it. She explains that gun control wont stop gun violence because of problems such as drugs leading to terrorists. Tammy Bruce in her article uses many statistics and viewpoints to support her claim against gun control.…
Are we more secure with or without the new gun laws? Very frequently nowadays we listen to storied about gun firing and get the well know story of a silly executing or a slaughter unfurl, we ourselves ask many questions and discuss them with our friends and colleagues like why are people so aggressive that they kill others? and what could be the reason that the person did such a terrible thing? I chose this article since it addresses the ceaseless open deliberation with respect to the need or not for a stricter weapon control laws. Erich Pratt’s, “Stricter Gun Control Laws Will Only Make Citizens Less Safe”, article which was appeared on the Us news website. Pratt’s point, in this article, is to persuade the audience that the new strict gun laws will be a limitation to the innocent people who won’t be allowed to keep a gun with them and without the gun they won’t be able to…
Hillary Clinton seems to be the best option for this years presidential election. She has the most political experience then everybody in the presidential election. One of these reasons is that Clinton is pro for that schools should be a gun free zones (Procon.org 1 pt. 33). It would not be a good idea to bring a gun to school grounds for many reasons like the fact these little kids are exposed to these murderous weapons that could take a life in a second. Kids should not be exposed to these things.…
Most rational gun owners realize that gun free zones in most cases, do not save lives or curb gun violence, and gun free zones may even entice mass shooters to target those areas.…
Don B. Kates discusses “shall-issue” laws on concealed carry permits in the United States. In his article, he begins by evaluating a famous study done by John Lott. His study credits the ‘deterrent’ effect of states’ “shall-issue” laws which spread handgun licensing out to responsible citizens who abide by the law and have a very minimal criminal record. Lott’s study suggests that “there is a massive reduction in violent crime in the 1990’s because criminals believe that most citizens within these “shall-issue” states have concealed handguns, therefore, are less likely to attack”. After reviewing Lott’s study, Kates criticizes the concept of a “gun-free zone”. In short he says that when one…
In the article there were discussions on gun control that I really just did not agree on for example, I do feel that gun control does stop some crimes but that it is so easy for an individual to obtain a weapon to that it really just not feel as if the world is a safer place to live in now that everyone is caring a weapon. I felt safer when only law officials were caring the weapons. I have always understood that people want to have the right to protect their families but I feel that it has gotten way beyond that. Protecting our families is not an issue the issue is weapons and the amount of weapons available and more and more guns are being not only sold but there are exchanging hands everyday, and this is a problem in where everyone thinks that gun-control laws are needed. With that being said I still do not agree…
There are three major shootings every year, and code-reds are practiced often, Donald Trump thinks if gun free zones were done without that gun attacks would go down. Trump thinks school shootings could…
I think for the safety of others I think that it is necessary for a person who wants to have a permit for a fire arm should go through some requirements and training. A firearm should not be given just to anyone. I agree that busy public places should do background checks on guns for the safety of everyone. One of the most important places to have background checks would be at schools, especially since all this shooting have been happening at schools. I agreed with the second article when it said that felons and mentally ill people should not have the possession of a firearm. In my point of view, I disagree when it said that possession of a fire arm for the safety of your life and the life of your family at your own home is necessary. We should be able to protect ourselves in case of an intrusion or a robbery or some kind of assault against a person who is putting our lives in danger. Of course that I agree that in order of having a firearm a person should have special training before getting one not only for their own safety but for the safety of others. What I think is that if it is necessary for a person with a permit of a firearm should carry a concealed gun. So far I really haven’t seen anything done by the government that keeps this from happening. All I see in the news is more and more people dying because of firearms but nothing important is being done about…
Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…
Limiting the accessibility of guns is a step in the right direction, despite the fact that people are going to find a way to get a gun if they want one, making it harder to obtain them will in some way decrease the amount of violence that is caused by a person in possession of a gun. As a result of the recent increase in mass shootings, many Americans in a way have become desensitized, they tune in for details, watch what goes on for a couple of days, but many people do not really care anymore than they would about their favorite TV show (source D Manson). We have change this and make it clear that these tragedies are happening in our communities and they should taken seriously rather than like just another news…
Despite the evidence found that gun control in fact could decline crime, some individuals refuse to believe so. One of those individuals is, Kit Daniels, a Texas journalist. Daniels in his article “10 reasons why gun control will not work” argues that putting a restriction on gun laws will not stop mass killings or gun related deaths nationwide, because individuals who are set out kill will find a way around these restrictions. Daniels then proceeds to argue that a limit on obtaining guns is a violation to the second amendment (Daniels). The argument that Daniels argues which is that gun control will not abolish mass shootings is accurate to an extend. As Daniels argues individuals who want are set out to kill others will proceed to do so.…
Though firearm training goes a long way to insure that accidents don’t happen, mass shootings similar to what is happening in this day and age can only be prevented by the strict gun control laws. Those suffering from mental illness or have ever been administer to a psychiatric facility mustn’t ever be allowed to wield or purchase firearms. The controversial suggestion of taking away guns may not come to fruition, but making sure that people with criminal and violent background aren’t able to get weapons will help the cause. These courses of reinforcing gun laws will indeed insure the safety of American…
James Q. Wilson wrote a great article called “Just Take Away Their Guns”. The article “Just Take Away Their Guns “ originally appeared on March 20, 1994 in The New York Times Magazine. In this article Wilson speaks about how gun laws do not work and they reduce the amount a law-abiding citizen can do to protect themselves when needed.…