In the case of Guiles vs Marineau; high school student Zachary Guiles, went against his principle Seth Marineau, to be able to wear an anti-Bush t-shirt that supposedly broke the school’s rules about having drug and alcohol images on it. The verdict from the judges came back not guilty. “The court stated that ‘“the pictures are an important part of the political message Guiles wished to convey, accentuating the anti-drug (and anti-Bush) message.” (ACLU) While in Richards v. Thurston, high school student Robert Richards went against his principal to; for not allowing him to have long hair. The court ruled in favor of Richards with reasonings due to no factual evidence showing that plaintiff's hair style was a health or sanitary risk to him or to others, or would interfere with plaintiff's or with others' performance of their school work, or would create disciplinary problems of a kind reasonably thought to be a concern of public officials.
In the case of Guiles vs Marineau; high school student Zachary Guiles, went against his principle Seth Marineau, to be able to wear an anti-Bush t-shirt that supposedly broke the school’s rules about having drug and alcohol images on it. The verdict from the judges came back not guilty. “The court stated that ‘“the pictures are an important part of the political message Guiles wished to convey, accentuating the anti-drug (and anti-Bush) message.” (ACLU) While in Richards v. Thurston, high school student Robert Richards went against his principal to; for not allowing him to have long hair. The court ruled in favor of Richards with reasonings due to no factual evidence showing that plaintiff's hair style was a health or sanitary risk to him or to others, or would interfere with plaintiff's or with others' performance of their school work, or would create disciplinary problems of a kind reasonably thought to be a concern of public officials.