David W. Barno writes in “A New Moral Compact,” about the current problem of having a volunteer military. He writes about the current war the United States is in as well as, previous wars like the Vietnam War. Barno’s main issue is that the population has distanced itself from the military and are less skeptical about going to war. He proposes, “. . .that every use of military force over 60 days would automatically trigger an annual draft lottery to call up 10,000 men and women” (20). Barno believes this will draw the population closer to the war effort eventually, becoming hesitant about going to war. Barno states, “It has also effectively lowered our national threshold for decisions to conduct military operations or go to war” (17). As war…
Every thing will have its contester, in one form or another. For examples, Mcdonalds contesters will be Burger kings, Wendy's, and so on. Nike contesters will be Adidas, or Puma. Lamborghini contesters will be a Ferrari, and Porsche. They are all similar in some way, but yet they are all competing against one another. Maybe for the sales, maybe for building the fastest cars, the number one spot, and ultimately fighting to become the best. All of this competition will lead to many discussions like who are the best, which one is better, and which one is fastest. When child argues with their friends about superheroes, they often favor the superhero they like and argue how he/she is the best. The true is, all superheroes are similar in some way,…
Technological advancements and it 's new and heavy artillery in modern warfare have been racking up debt and upping the cost of war with the world 's most valuable currency: real human lives. The draft after World War Two forced American boys to pack up their bags and go off to war because it was their only choice- besides running away to Canada or Mexico to avoid it. Because some made it out, the effects of war lingered and were overlooked. The aftermath of the Vietnam War left veterans crippled with memories of the endless rice paddies and ghosts of their lost friends, and many of them were left with trauma disorders, like PTSD. The real cost of war wasn’t the $600 million spent on military and technology, but the 58,000 American lives lost and 350,000 Americans physically or mentally crippled as a result instead. The cost of any war is also the same: trading your sanity or your life for real life combat.…
While most Americans call the war the, “American-Mexican War”, the other side would call it, “The U.S. Invasion”. If it is God’s reasoning to expand the U.S. territory as far as possible, then is it also his reasoning to murder those upon their own land? It is not only unjustified to take the land from the Mexicans, however to become inhuman enough to kill those while doing so is unspeakable. There was no need for any more conflict at that time, so to start a war was not ideal for anyone. Would a war be more beneficial or cost efficient than a compromise or a buyout? The Mexicans had only simple ideas of allowing outsiders into their land to increase population. In the words of General Francisco Mejia, “The right of conquest has always been…
A June 2013, reports of the Institute of Medicine claim that "most all firearms utilized as a part of criminal acts enter dissemination by means of starting legitimate exchange. “Somewhere around 2005 and 2010, 1.4 million firearms were stolen from US homes amid property violations, a yearly normal of 232,400.Ian Ayres, JD, PhD, and John J. Donohue, JD, PhD, Educators of Law at Yale Graduate school and Stanford Graduate school separately, state, "with weapons being an item that can be effortlessly diverted and rapidly sold at a moderately high portion of the underlying cost, the nearness of more firearms can really serve as a boost to robbery and burglary. Regardless of the fact that the firearm proprietor had a grant to convey a covered weapon…
Does the NSA have a good enough reason to spy on its own citizens along with the other billions of foreigners when there are laws implemented to stop that exact act? Is it necessary to create more terrorists because of the hate towards this program, just to possibly catch the current ones we face now? What is the real end goal? Is it to create a black mail mega-data for the government to have insurance due to the debt? Maybe the U.S.A is planning a global attack themselves, or it really is meant to stop terroristic acts against the United States.…
“I believe that almost all law enforcement officials are upstanding, dedicated public servants who deserve our appreciation and support -- and not to be used as scapegoats or, as we've seen lately, become targets of violence” (Toomey). Though this is the mindset that a majority of the population of the United States holds, there is still a portion which has opposing opinions in their outlook upon law enforcement personnel. Within the past few years there has been an increase in unprovoked attacks upon law enforcement personnel, these attacks are commonly promoted by several sections of American society that wish to see harm done to these brave men and women. A better understanding of the feelings and relationships that law enforcement personnel…
The author captures the history of America’s force in readiness and explains why their reputation is well-deserved. The part of the book was least effective was the amount of political and bureaucratic information and how overwhelming it felt. Though it did make up a large part of this book, it was still good information considering that is how we view ourselves and how our sister services view us.…
The issues that I am addressing is that stricter guns control will make the American citizen less safe. First of all, stricter gun control could attacking the 2nd amendment of the constitution of their right to bear arms and to defend themselves. My stance on this issues is that trickster can control can put people’s lives in harm’s way and won’t be able to defend themselves in case of robberies, and other criminal activities.…
It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the…
The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…
Many Americans today openly carry their guns with them in public. There are different reasons why some people do open-carry, but one of the main reasons is for self protection. America has had many gun laws passed in the past years, making it more strict. With all of the shootings going on, and terroristic threats, more people have been buying guns for their own protection. People never know when a shooting could happen, and that is a scary thought to many Americans across the nation.…
Imagine having a person on your property or in a dangerous situation and all their is is a pistol to defend yourself. Someone could grab the pistol or can hit someone with something. If assault weapons were to be banned then there would be no protection in society. “Encouraging assault weapons for military use is useful because military would not protect the country with a pistol” (Richman). This is showing that the most wanted weapon is an assault weapon because of it power. If someone compares a pistol to a assault weapon there is a power advantage but still can do the same thing with an assault weapon as a pistol can do. Assault weapons should not be banned, there should just be a more stricter law on purchasing a weapon.…
Since the U.S. has the greatest military spending world nation and it is the highest budget in federal spending, the information presented will discuss the issues of military spending. Understanding how economic growth is working in the United States will influence the opinion of the American society. Since almost 37 percent thinks that we should spend more on military (Newport), this research paper might convince those with such point of views to reconsider their opinions about…
“The thought of military grade weapons being given to the local police is madness” (Sgt. Rob Aponte quoted in Kachmar). GIving military grade weapons to local police is not something people think about daily. Most think if there is armored cars in their village would make their village safer, but is this really the case? According to the 1033 program, which was installed in 1997, more than 4.3 billion dollars of military gear has been given to local police across the nation senes 1997 (ingraham). In 2013 alone just about a billion dollars was given to local law enforcement agencies (ingraham).The Department of Defense is selling these weapons to local police, but they shouldn’t be selling military grade weapons to untrained police officers (Ingraham). Overall, selling military grade weapons to local police forces is dangerous, excessive, and unnecessary.…