In favor of the ban on tobacco advertising the proponent of a ban argue that tobacco advertising does not increase the market for tobacco products. They only seek to influence the brand decisions of existing smokers and informing adults. One of the firms submitted to the commons Health Committee “Cigarette advertising does not cause people to take up smoking. Simply put, cigarette advertising has two purposes-to maintain brand loyalty and encourage smokers to switch brand.”Advertising is the major challenge that managers face and this means that they cannot present their products and services to their customers to the best way they …show more content…
Especially when it comes to tobacco that the government is against, it makes it difficult for advertisement to take place. Eventually the demand and supply will be low and this will also make things to be at stand still involving the collapse of the company. Secondly the favor of tobacco ban was argued about when the tobacco industry was seen to be the major contributor to the state as much as much as tobacco is concerned. Which it was said (In the year 2000-01 it contributed about Rs.8000 crores in excise revenue. This was very important to the government. Sourcing of raw material is also another challenge that managers face where by the company will buy the raw material from the supplier at lower price and the type of raw material that pollutes the environment, air like cigarettes which comes from tobacco contents. Privacy of the employees should not be interfered with but due to some conditions like not being transparent which makes the manager to be suspicious will mean the manager to go through private information of the employee to be on the safer side which is not right, may be the