The French revolution which began in 1789 and lasted until the fall of Robespierre in July 1794 is known by many for its violence while seeking social and political change, primarily during The Terror.
The Terror, otherwise known as the ‘Reign of Terror’ was implemented on the 5th September 1793 and lasted until the fall of Maximilien Robespierre on the 28th July 1794. The purpose of the Terror was to for the revolutionary governments to consolidate power by violently repressing internal discontent, by defeating the foreign powers and by building an army to serve the above purposes.
The revolution saw that the monarch be overthrown and feudalism abolished in the interests of the majority. Surrounding countries mainly Prussia, Austria and later Britain who were ruled by absolute monarchies viewed the uprising as a threat to their power and intervened with the use of military force. It was not only foreign powers to oppose the revolution, but also the clergy, nobility and others who had benefited from feudalism.
The Terror began on the 5th September after the initial onset of the French Revolution. Shortly after The Terror began, The Law of Suspects was introduced on the 17th September 1793. Its main purpose was to authorise the creation of revolutionary tribunals to try those suspected of Treason against the Republic and sentence those convicted with death. The implementation of this law served the purpose of oppressing internal discontent in France.
In May 1793, the First Maximum had been introduced to deter price gouging of grain and it also made hoarding a criminal offence. Under the Terror, the Revolutionary Tribunal was created which had the power to execute those suspected or convicted of hoarding grain, assisting foreign powers or any other supporting other political opponents. The Law of Suspects which allowed for the construction of revolutionary tribunals was a measure taken to ensure those who opposed Revolutionary Governments were punished by death. The Law Of Prairial which began on the 20th June 1794 was designed to make convictions easier by banning suspects to have a defense at the tribunal. The leader of The Terror was seen to be Maximilien Robespierre who focused the energies of Revolutionary Governments on the uprisings in France. Robespierre justified The Terror to the people of France by telling people that it was merely “nothing other than justice; prompt, severe, inflexible. The above laws made it easier for The Terror to execute those who disagreed with the revolution and furthermore helped the revolutionary government consolidate power.
One of the key purposes of The Terror was to eliminate the internal discontent of the French people with the use of force and thus consolidate power. A repressive government was adopted for those who resisted the revolution and furthermore supported a counter revolution. The government was fearful of a counter revolution for two reasons: One because the Revolutionary Governments had worked so hard to get to the point at which they were at and two because they feared the return of the monarch which was seen as an intolerable regime by the majority. The majority consisted of the urban middle class, working middle class, and the poor. The guillotine became the icon of the revolution with it being the most common way for executions to take place during the revolution. People crowded for public executions of those found guilty of crimes against liberty because in such an era it was considered entertainment to see guilty persons punished for their crimes. Because the majority of the people were in favour of the revolution, people were satisfied when the guilty received justice. Hence the barbaric measures taken in the French Revolution were not considered barbaric until after the revolution had ended. It is estimated that some 10 456 people were executed by the guillotine for speaking up against the Revolutionary Governments The repressive government during the Terror used execution to quell internal opposition and hence consolidate its power.
The second purpose of the terror was to eliminate foreign enemies who opposed the revolution and thus sought the return of a monarch in France. The kings of Prussia and Austria took a stand against the revolutionary governments in France who declared war on them in 1972, prior to the commencement of The Terror. By the time The Terror was in progression, the foreign armies had long invaded France. The revolutionary governments were not only fearful of the foreign armies, but also of the contagiousness of their ideologies. Some people, mainly the nobility joined forces with the foreign armies to fight for their united ideologies. Thus the external forces escalated the internal opposition that the revolutionary governments were fearful of. The Austrians issued a notice to the people of Luxembourg declaring the French Army was ‘duping you by the illusion of liberty and equality’. This in a way indicated that the external threats were worsening the internal discontent. If caught, those who joined the opposing military were punished by the revolutionary tribunals with the use of the guillotine.
It is important to say that it were not only those who aligned themselves with the foreign armies who were punished by The Terror, but also those who merely supported the foreign powers. The revolutionary executed not only those who committed acts against liberty but those who thought the revolution was wrong. Revolutionary governments have been labelled by some as paranoid of any opposition, regardless of how minor it may be. Historians including Alphonse Aulard believes that Robespierre made systematic use of a sort of political paranoia’ constantly hinting that the revolutionary project was being frustrated by treacherous but invisible enemies who must, therefore, be identified and eliminated In summary, the purpose of The Terror was to consolidate power by use of force against external powers who opposed the revolution.
The third cause of the revolution was to construct a French Army in order to purge France of its enemies and hence consolidate power. The external invasion called for a mass mobilisation of the entirety of France. In order to do so, the revolutionary governments manipulated the people to fight against the external opposition for “the unity of the republic”. Despite the mass killings by the Revolutionary Tribunal, the resistance to the revolution remained the choice of the minority. 46.It was popular enthusiasm to save France from the foreigner which prompted so many to join the army. During The Terror, a dechristianisation process was initiated which was also implemented by the army. The French military was a necessity during The Terror as its purpose was to ensure the revolutionary governments consolidated power by defeating both internal and external opposition.
The purpose of The Terror was to consolidate power via purging France of its enemies and by the construction of a French army to achieve this. The use of force saw thousands die at the guillotine in the interests of liberty. The Terror was successful in preventing counter revolution and thus consolidating power.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1. In 1793, the revolution entered a radical phase. For a year, France experienced one of the bloodiest regimes in its long history as determined leaders sought to extend and preserve the revolution.…
- 1527 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
King Louis XVI was in power during the revolution, he was thrown into this position when King Louis XV attempted to flee the country. Extravagant spending by the king’s father left the country on the brink of bankruptcy. Unrest among the peasants knowing there situation, were not willing to support the feudal system any longer. When the three states assembled, they imposed heavy tax increases, which were approved by Nobility and Clergy. This left the country in flames, while the taxes did not provide relief, the French Revolution was created.…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
B.One knows that when matters take more than a year to finish, then serious procedures must be taken. In a letter sent to a revolutionary government in Paris a local government is doing just that (Doc. D) “departmental advisor requests... a decree whereby the criminal court of Niort judges this case as the last resort.” This letter suggests that the Revolution is so chaotic in there city that even their own government cannot handle it. As a result they request the right to be able to execute anyone inside of France that is possibly a traitor. In short, The Reign of Terror was justified because even internal threats governments wanted to take the Revolution to extreme measures and to stop it as quickly as possible. C.Continuing with the internal threats in France there was another event happening in France as shown in the timeline provided (Doc. A) “April 1793- Counterrevolutionary revolts break out in France.” This quote implies that in order to stop all these revolts and to maintain peace the people who caused the revolts must be eliminated.D. Hence, eliminating the causes of these revolts were one of the methods used to bring back France’s strength and stability. For this reason the Reign of Terror was the ultimate way to stop the Revolution and create a new…
- 1082 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“The execution of Louis XVI marked the beginning of the 18 month period of the French Revolution that has come to be called ‘The Reign of Terror’”(49). It was led by no other than Robespierre, in an attempt to start a new government, which proceeded to execute large numbers of people. The 18 months was a blood pouring event during the French Revolution. These events were unnecessary and the whole Reign of Terror was unjustified because it was a sin to kill, they went against what other through and what was right, and they went beyond what was necessary.…
- 656 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…
- 323 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror started with the onset of the French Revolution, and during this period of time anyone thought to be an enemy of the revolution was executed. Document 6 shows a picture of a public execution occurring with thousands of people watching. The primary method of execution was by guillotine and during the Reign of Terror this gruesome contraption took the lives of over 16,000 people over the course of 9 months. The Reign of Terror finally ended with the execution of Robespierre in 1794. When Napoleon seized power in 1799, many citizens saw it as a good thing. They believed France needed a strong leader, and Napoleon filled that description well. Napoleon believed that “To have good soldiers, a nation must always be at war.” (Document 8). He was a very strong military leader, and he always looked to achieve more military conquests. He won lots of crucial battles for France and was remembered as a great war…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The accused were denied by lawyers. Conviction based on patriotic "intuition" rather than evidence was allowed. In Paris, while some members of the upper classes were acquitted, the Tribunal sentenced 2,750 to death.” ("Document E." The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified?) The revolutionaries were betraying their principles by not providing adequate due process for the accused.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
shows that the Reign of Terror was not justified by the threats to the French government…
- 666 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The French Revolution was a major impact on Europe. The French Revolution was a period of economic, social, and political changes. It began July 14, 1784 and ended in the 1790’s. The revolution took place in France. It was cause by Napoleon Bonaparte, he expanded the french empire. As the expansion was caused it led to many wars and monarchy to end. The French Revolution was a failure and a success at the same time. Many people were executed and nothing was successful till it ended. During The French Revolution there was the reign of terror and the rise of Napoleon. There were many wars and executions. When the French Revolution ended the economy was recovered.…
- 525 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The “National Razor” or the Guillotine was used to kill many during the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror was the period during the French Revolution beginning in 1789 and ended in 1794. King Louis XVI was ruling France during this time. He was disliked by many while all of this was going on. Many people at home starved because of King Louis’ selfish decisions. Many people now ask, was the Reign of terror justified? This question has been out there for a while now. I believe the Reign of Terror was not justified because King Louis XVI was like a dictator, and left many people to live in poor conditions, many people died as a result under his rule.…
- 645 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Reign of Terror is the period of the French revolution since September 5, 1793, to July 27 1794. It was a civil and a foreign war, where the government decided to terrify the people of France, and to take harsh consequences against those who were against the revolution, like the nobles and priests. The government forced terror in the hearts of the French. Approximately 40,000 people die during the Terror. About 15% were the nobles and clergy. Another 15% were the middle class. The rest were peasants. The brain of the terror is the Guillotine. It was blade, which dropped fast, and the victim would not feel pain. Dr. Joseph Guillotine created the Guillotine, and it quickly became a symbol of horror in the Reign of Terror. Another method used in the period of Terror was The Breaking Wheel. The Breaking wheel was the famous execution before the Guillotine. The Breaking Wheel was a torture device where they attach a person to the wheel and rotate the wheel were his bones break and the person gets dehydrated. Drowning was also a method used in the French Revolution. Jean-Baptiste Carrier put his victims into vessels with trapdoors for bottoms and to sink them in the Loire River.…
- 511 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
20,000-40,000 people died from the guillotine alone. This loss adds to the evidence that people of France did not want the Reign of Terror, therefore it is not justified. The people of France might have been more okay with the Reign of Terror if it did not contradict France’s ideas of rights and actions. Originally it seemed that France was doing the right thing to hire spies in neighborhoods, also known as the “Committee of Public Safety” .However, the original idea of things being safer for citizens was soon shot down.…
- 553 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Some of the crimes people committed, they might of needed to get a harsh punishment. some of the things people did was not worthy to be hung, they may even get hanged for (a petty crime like stealing a piece of fabric) which is not ok but an unnecessary punishment. people started to take notice. Of course they can't do anything about it but just stay out of prison.…
- 488 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
determined much of the character of the criminal law. As late as 1765, the majority of…
- 1728 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
When the historian is using general laws that are known to him but that could demonstrably not have been known to the people he is talking about, he is interpreting” (Munz, 1977, p. 70). Therefore, there are two possibilities of transferring the historical events to today’s world: explanation and interpretation. For Munz, there is a difference between reality and actuality. Accordingly, using the general law of the historical agents gives us “what actually happened”, whilst to find out “what really happened”, “we must seek to obtain a sequence of events linked by a law that we believe to be true” (Munz, 1977, p. 84). This paper, by taking Munz’s methodology, focuses on changes in the punishment methods in the late 18th and 19th centuries, and presents both an explanation and one of the interpretations of the…
- 1064 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays