Preview

The Rationale of Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Rationale of Death Penalty
The Rationale of Death Penalty
Capital punishment, as the highest form of punishment a state would uphold has been a long debated issue. Often dubbed as Death Penalty, Deborah White defined it as “the pre-meditated and planned taking of a human life by the state in response to a crime committed by that legally convicted person.” Personally, I’m not in favour of making death penalty the highest form of punishment. To support this many points are to be considered: (1) The value of life. Life cannot be measured thus death penalty cannot measure the worth of life that even the worst criminal should be deprived of his own life. Everyone has the right to live and by subjecting the individual to death penalty would destitute his right to life. (2) Retribution is morally flawed and a problematic concept; thus making it immoral for it is just a sanitised form of vengeance. Retribution in the case of death penalty is not fair because the expected suffering of the criminal before execution would probably outweigh the suffering of the victim, making it imbalance and unfair. Death penalty brings double punishment, for execution and proceeding would mismatch the crime done. Since death penalty is not operated retributively, it should not be use to justify capital punishment. Life imprisonment without parole possibility is much more suffering than death. (3) Death penalty doesn’t deter people from committing serious crime. Being caught and punished is the thing that deters them to do so. True deterrence is through increased detection, arrest and conviction for justice. (4)As morality is concern, Death penalty is cruel, inhumane and degrading. This is so because all ways of executing a person cause so much suffering to him that this amount to self torture which is wrong. It represent “brutal and unusual punishment”’ whatever means used by the state to kill are vindictive. (5) Death penalty is used disproportionally to the poor and weak, who cannot afford expensive legal means,



References: American Civil Liberties Union. The Case Against the Death Penalty.2012. accessed from http://www.aclu.org/capital-punishment/case-against-death-penalty White, Deborah. Pros & Cons of Death Penalty. Accessed from http://usliberals.about.com/od/deathpenalty/i/DeathPenalty.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment? Balanced Politics (https://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm) illustrates proponents and opponent’s points of views. Select adversary viewpoints say “Financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life. It is barbaric and violates the "cruel and unusual" clause in the Bill of Rights. The endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system. Society needs to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge mentality if civilization is to advance.” Some death penalty advocates say “The death penalty gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. It creates another form of crime deterrent. Justice is better served. Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims.” https://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm Capital punishment comes with large amounts of gray area, so to say I am personally on one side or the either would be unfair. I believe in moving away from the “revenge mentality.” I also don’t believe murder victim’s families ever receive justice after losing a loved one. The death penalty teaches nothing, it’s just a means to an end. Repeating history lingers until society and law adapt better criminal punishment…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is only an act of vengeance. I am highly against capital punishment. Our constitution is supposed to protect all lives, even the lives of a criminal. Yes terrible and traumatic actions are committed, but it is strongly stated that there is still no right to murder the guilty. The death penalty is actually the most overlooked form of government hypocrisy. Why should the government murder people to show murder is wrong? Will there ever be an actual lesson to learn?…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The death penalties are usually carried out for retribution of a heinous murder committed, such as aggravated murder, felony killing or contract killing. Every state handles what method they want to use to put a person to death according to their state laws. The death penalty is given by lethal injection, electrocution; gas chamber firing squad and hanging are some of the ways that certain states may carry out their death penalty procedures. I will present some views and personal opinion dealing with the pros and cons of the death penalty. The death penalty is such a life altering subject that affects all parties’ lives that are involved in the death penalty process. I personally have mixed feeling about the death penalty. I don’t know really if I would be a person that would support the death penalty or not. I do feel that murdering someone is wrong, and since no one really close to me has never been murdered. I don’t know if my feeling would change as being a supporter for the death penalty or not. I can only pray that God will help this county to make the right choices when comes to life or death.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine in the middle of the night someone comes into your house and slaughters your entire family. You were the only one to survive because you hid under the bed as he came into your room. Imagine the pain that you would endure for the rest of your life while the person who slaughtered your family still goes on living the rest of their life with food and water. This is not justice because the same men and women that kill our families and friends are still allowed to live. I believe that the death penalty is the right answer because it gives justice to the families, it acts as a deterrence, and it is economically smart.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people. Capital punishment is known as the “The Death Penalty” and is identified as the premeditated and planned taking of a human life. The government views this as a response to a crime committed by a legally convicted person. The question is The Death Penalty just and applied fairly? The argument against Capital punishment can include the following; Amnesty International, who believes that “The Death Penalty” is the cruelest denial of human, rights (White, 2009). The pro’s state that, “Capital punishment gives society the right and duty to protect the innocent in self-defense.” The Death Penalty gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. Some families may never recover from the cruelty of the crime, and most families just want closure. Most Americans and people from different countries such as; china, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan agree with capital punishment. White stated, “I believe that it sends the wrong message: Killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong (White, 2009). Therefore, is it just and applied fairly is the question that is asked, should we kill because some kill? I believe that we are sending a message to promote killing, is it fair for some and not for others.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is an issue that has been used to handle severe crimes in nearly every country either now or in the past. Even though I understand both sides of capital punishment, I can not morally say that it's good. Though many say that the death penalty is the only way to go , it can not be justified because it is not morally correct to punish people with death.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In any case, frequent punishments are a sign of weakness or slackness in the government. There is no man so bad that he cannot be made good for something. No man should be put to death, even as an example, if he can be left to live without danger to society.”( Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract) What Rousseau stated here aids in prompting thoughts such as whether carrying out the death penalty is morally right? Does punishment need to go as far as bestowing death on a person’s life? Should the loss of a life be considered an efficient way of repaying those who were affected by the crimes that person committed? The death penalty is defined as a sentence of execution administered to someone who has committed murder or some capital crime. (Oxford University Press)…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gas chamber method has killed five hundred and ninety-three people since 1608. Firing squad is the method that has been applied the least amount of times over history, one hundred and fifty-six times. This method usually consists of the inmates being bound to a chair with leather straps, across the body, then a black bag being pulled over their head. A doctor will locate the inmates heart with a target, and five armed shooters point their guns at the inmate and shoot. Death row is something that has definitely decreased over the years, but that hardly means it's not still around, because it is, and there are many people today facing death penalty and currently on death row. (CriminalJusticDegreeHub.com).…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Looking at society today, I often wonder what we the people can do differently to make our world a better place. There has been so much crime: drug trafficking, rape, burglaries, domestic violence, murders, and much more. Our justice system claims to be working but I beg to differ. Repercussions for criminal wrong doing are slim to none and can possibly be sending out the wrong message to the people in America. People would be more willing to commit a crime and take their slap on the wrist per se. What about capital punishment? Does it exist anymore?…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First and foremost, we can view the death penalty from the aspect of economic. Everyone is asking a question whether the death penalty should be abolished. If the death penalty abolished, it will replaced by life imprisonment and this will increase the burden of economic of a country. The government of that country needs to spend more budgets in this aspect. This will lead to the increasing of taxpayers and it is not fair for the citizens or taxpayers due to this replacement. However, we need to ask a question again whether the save of money is important than the life. As we know, we cannot compare everything with money in this world such as health, love, spirit and others. For example, we can buy the medicine but we cannot buy the…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays