Preview

The Right To Die

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Right To Die
“The right to die should be a matter of personal choice” says Michael Irwin, MPH, MD, and former Medical Director at the United Nations in a 2013 Mirror article. He believes that since we are able to choose all kinds of things in life like who we marry and what work we want to do, we should also have a choice whether we are of old age or have a terminal illness, we too should

have a choice about what happens to us. Brittany Maynard, a 29 year old with stage 4 Glioblastoma multiforme (a brain tumor) launched a campaign to raise awareness of euthanasia. She stated that not one ounce of cells in in her body wants to die, but she knows that her glioblastoma is going to eventually kill her. After speaking with many experts about the process of death from it, all of them said it’s “a terrible way to die.” In her case, being able to go with the help of doctors, her way is the only choice she has. (A Quick and painless death). If we let prisoners on death row go peacefully when suffering, why don’t we do the same for humans outside of the gate?
…show more content…
They are inheritors of a valuable tradition that inspires public trust. None should be even partly responsible for the erosion of that trust. Nothing that is remotely beneficial to some particular patient in extremis is worth the damage that will be created by the perception that physicians sometimes aid and even abet people in taking their own lives” (The Practice Of Euthanasia). In many con arguments, some believe that doctors are here to help assist and make sure one gets well, not “give up” and kill the patient if nothing seems to work. Many religions look against this and believe that life is the most basic gift of a loving God--a gift over which we have stewardship but not absolute

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Not all terminally ill patients will choose this option, but it should be available for those who want it. Coping with the diagnosis of a terminal illness is difficult for both the patient and the patient’s loved ones and it only becomes more difficult as the disease progresses. Being given the ability to decide when to die allows the patient to feel a sense of dignity and control during a time when he or she may not have control over anything else in life. Not only does physician-assisted suicide provide a sense of relief to the patient, it provides relief to family and friends. Watching a loved one die is one of the most challenging things to endure in life. It only becomes more challenging when forced to watch a loved one die a slow and painful death. Physician-assisted suicide can provide closure to everyone involved in a situation dealing with a terminal illness; therefore, it must become legal in all fifty…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should a person with a terminal illness be allowed to die with dignity and take their own life with the help of a medical doctor? The right to die is being able to take one’s life in a painless way with assistance from a medical doctor when that person has a terminal illness. When you are dying from an illness such as cancer, end stage kidney disease, end stage heart failure, and so on, ending your life in a painless manner with professional assistance is a very dignified way to die. In our society there are many debates being brought about by this subject.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, I believe a person should not be able to choose whether they will live or die because dying…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1,672). A huge theme that society has seen in regards to euthanasia is the physician’s role. Physicians have been seen as murderers for assisting the death of their patients and they have been referred to as mercy-killers. However, many people tend to disregard the fact that even the physician, who is usually the one being blamed, can actually be the victim as well. According to the American Medical Association’s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, it was stated that “although life-prolonging medical treatment may be withheld, the physician should not intentionally cause death” (as cited in Dickinson, Clark, Winslow & Marples, 2005, p. 44). In a study mentioned by Dickinson et al. (2005) it was found that when physicians were asked about whether or not active voluntary euthanasia (AVE) should be legalized, the percentage of those who were in favor of was between 35% and 71% (p.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, people have the right to end their life when they choose because they do not want to suffer anymore. There are people in this world who live with a terminal illness knowing their days are numbered. Pain has been associated with death for a long time. No one, especially the people who are dying of an illness, want to die in pain. Patients tell doctors they would rather die at home than at…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if you knew that your path in life was coming to an end and were told it was going to be insufferable? Would you endure the agony of dying slowly and uncomfortably; or would you choose to pass away on your own terms, comfortably surrounded by friends, family, and loved ones? Assisted suicide is more often than not confused with euthanasia. With the process of euthanasia the physician is the individual who administers the, usually a lethal, drug.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a society we associate doctors and health care professionals with the idea of healing; and having physicians be able to assist in the suicide of a patient might alter people’s opinion on doctors as a whole. In Jon Fullers article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: An unnecessary Crisis”, he states, “granting [this] power to physicians would sully subconscious image[s] of the healer” (Fuller 10). Fuller believes that allowing physicians to take part in ending someones life, would change how health care professions are viewed. Fuller also writes that participating in the,“ taking of life crosses a threshold and threatens the trust in beneficence that is the root of the physician-patient relationship”(12). It takes a strong relationship between doctor and patient to come to the consensus that there are no other options for that patient. There has to be a great deal of trust for a patient to believe the physicians profession opinion on their course of treatment is accurate. For the patient having the their doctor help them end their life is an act of beneficence. The laws for physician assisted suicide are clear on the fact that the patient must be terminal with less than six months to live. Many people choose physician assisted suicide because they don’t want those last six months to be full of suffering and the worse months of their life. To the patients…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some individual’s health complications are too painful to think of prolonging. Individuals who are ill should have the right to decide whether they can bear any more or not. They should be able to decide whether it is worth living the few months they have remaining. It is hard to imagine how a terminally ill patient may feel knowing they’re dying. The thought itself is agonizing and I can understand how some may want to use physician assisted suicide to go in peace.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some terminally ill patients are allowed to end their lives by refusing medical treatments; in all fairness, those without that option should be allowed to choose death…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The right to die is a very controversial subject. Some people may have strong religious beliefs that have a great impact on their opinion. Whether or not a person can choose their own time of death in a terminal illness situation is the question. And should individuals who assist in these assisted deaths should be prosecuted. There are two types of Euthanasia: passive, and active.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctor-Assisted Suicide

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To look at the right to die one must first question if it is compassionate to keep a person in a consistent state of suffering until they succumb to their illness? Suffering, disease, pain are all synonymous with deterioration, in this case, it’s deterioration of life itself. Euthanasia of a beloved pet is the ‘humane’ way to say goodbye in many cases due to our humanitarian obligation to preclude pain, this humanity should be extended to humans. Our society under the preconceived notion that death is a punishment that is only inflicted to those who have committed the greatest of crimes, or equally as dangerous, that death is a sort of tragedy. To protect the sanctity of life in a person whose quality of life is limited, they should be allowed to request to hasten their own death. Physician-assisted suicide does not denigrate life, it enhances…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Our nation was founded on the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” -Leonard Boswell. In the constitution it states the concept that everyone have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness therefore, you get to decide if you want to live or not. For people that are terminally ill, or have less than six months to live,they have options. They can do, doctor assisted suicide, euthanasia, or they can suffer until they pass away. When using doctor assisted suicide or euthanasia, the patient doesn't have to suffer, or continue suffering until they die. Doctor assisted suicide and euthanasia are an efficient way to (1) end people's suffering, (2) euthanasia doesn’t end lives early, it prevents them from seeing…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    About 1.2 million new cancer cases are diagnosed in the U.S. annually and about 564,000 Americans will die of it each year -- more than 1,500 people per day (Caner). Terminally ill people should have the right to be able to choose assisted suicide for themselves. If a person is in extreme pain or has major complications from a treatment that they went through they shouldn’t have to suffer until the disease decides to take their life.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death is a natural event that every living thing must go through as part of the life cycle. Death has many causes, such as accidents, disease, and old age. Disease is probably the most painful and stressful forms of death, mainly because of the manmade cures and treatments a person goes through to attempt to fight the sickness. As the disease progresses, the pain is progressing as well. Some pain is worse than others, but those with extreme cases may not wish to die an agonizing death. A peaceful death is something that every living creature is entitled to. For example, if someone’s dog is sick and in pain and will not live a comfortable life because of their sickness, the dog is euthanized. It is an interesting fact that an animal can be euthanized, but a conscious, rational human being cannot have the same treatment if they are incapable of ending their own life. Abortion is the termination of an unborn child, who has no choice in the matter, but that is also legal. It is odd that an animal or unborn child that cannot make the choice to end their life can be killed legally, but a person who decides to ask for assistance in ending their own life cannot do so because it is illegal and defies the morals of the majority. However, just the desire to die should not be sufficient to receive a physician’s assisted suicide. A person should be in physical, not mental, pain. Mental pain can be lessened with medications and…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays