have a choice about what happens to us. Brittany Maynard, a 29 year old with stage 4 Glioblastoma multiforme (a brain tumor) launched a campaign to raise awareness of euthanasia. She stated that not one ounce of cells in in her body wants to die, but she knows that her glioblastoma is going to eventually kill her. After speaking with many experts about the process of death from it, all of them said it’s “a terrible way to die.” In her case, being able to go with the help of doctors, her way is the only choice she has. (A Quick and painless death). If we let prisoners on death row go peacefully when suffering, why don’t we do the same for humans outside of the gate? …show more content…
They are inheritors of a valuable tradition that inspires public trust. None should be even partly responsible for the erosion of that trust. Nothing that is remotely beneficial to some particular patient in extremis is worth the damage that will be created by the perception that physicians sometimes aid and even abet people in taking their own lives” (The Practice Of Euthanasia). In many con arguments, some believe that doctors are here to help assist and make sure one gets well, not “give up” and kill the patient if nothing seems to work. Many religions look against this and believe that life is the most basic gift of a loving God--a gift over which we have stewardship but not absolute